Youtube comments of (@dingokidneys).
-
261
-
162
-
147
-
140
-
137
-
132
-
126
-
86
-
84
-
76
-
58
-
55
-
54
-
49
-
41
-
38
-
38
-
34
-
30
-
25
-
24
-
21
-
20
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
As a child, my parents took me and my siblings to church every Sunday. However, when I stopped to think, even as a little kid, and tried to put myself into the mind of a person who really believed in a god, I found it unsettling and freaky. I always hated going to church as it was boring and tedious. However, as a kid, I didn't have a say in the matter. I did participate and actually become an alter server which was better because at least there was something to do. I also became involved in a christian group in high school again as something to do that most of my friends were involved with, however, when I stopped to think about if these people actually believed what they said they believed, it was still unsettling and weird.
I eventually had to admit to myself that I was an atheist and there was no changing that. I didn't come to it through rationality although rational analysis always seemed to back up my feeling.
The 'cred' factor didn't seem to play a part either because I simply could not bring myself to believe that significant people in my life truly "believed" what they said they did. I thought they were at best being self-delusional; the way double-think is described in George Orwell's 1984.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ITonOccasion If you're new to tracking finances and especially if you don't have experience with accounting software, I'd be cautious about going all in on a SaaS solution like Wave. If you find it's not actually a good fit, trying to get your data out of these systems in a way that you can import into another can be difficult. They also often have unique work flows which can be confusing initially and, when you become used to them, make transitioning to a new system more confusing than it needs to be.
For a real noob, I'd rather get them going on a spreadsheet - a simple cash book style layout - and probably an invoicing app like Tom outlined because it's easy to understand and it can lay down some core principles which then make transitioning to a more sophisticated accounting solution easier.
If you then want to move on to a basic accounting system, I'd rather go with a local software package like GnuCash or KMyMoney because they support industry standard import/export file formats, you have total control of your data, and your personal and business details are not being leveraged to sell stuff to you and others.
However, as I said earlier, use what works best for you. Different people understand and relate to things differently and if Wave works for you, that's great. I had a quick look at it (10 minutes or so) and it's got some nice features. There are also a few little traps for the unwary in there.
Be good friends with your accountant. I'm not selling accounting services here but most small businesses go down the tube within the first two years of operation. Often that's because they didn't know where they were financially at all times. Sometimes this is because the book-keeping just gets on top of them which is a shame because if it's set up properly - for you - it can really be easy and be a great help.
All the best.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I wouldn't be too quick to jump on the fire authorities "unpreparedness". This is the off season for them, a time when people can take vacations, when training can be done, and plans developed. Yes they are prepared to respond to fires but historically they have not had to respond to huge fires at this time of the year. Budget constraints make sure that the resources available will always be minimal, because who's going to fund more than absolutely, unequivocally demonstrated to be essential. That said, these fires took off in canyons with steep sides which acts like a chimney and causes the fire to develop much more quickly than usual. Once you get that much heat over such a significant area, as you observed yourself, the fire creates it's own weather which helps it to develop in unexpected ways. The embers that blow ahead of the fire cause spot overs that demand attention and spread any fire fighting effort out thinly.
And this all probably started out from some person doing a foolish thing.
One of the worst fires I attended, as crew, was started by two kids with a poorly managed barbeque who managed to knock it over. The fire took off and they fled. This was on an island and yet we had spot overs to the mainland about a mile away.
You don't fight fires like this. You try to manage them by slowing their progress down, by diverting their weakest flanks back into the burnt area, by cutting fire breaks and hoping for a change in the wind and weather that works in your favour. You also get all the people and livestock that you can out of the path.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've been using computers since the late '70's and, contrary to your assertion, Windows, which was based on DOS, was built to emulate Unix concepts. It did it very badly which is one of the reasons it's ended up quite a long way from Unix these days but it still has POSIX compliance to a point; it needed to have that to be acceptable to the US Government.
When you install one of the major consumer oriented Linux distros, you get a system that doesn't require you to know anything about the command line interface and comes bundled with office type software - granted it is not Microsoft Office but even Windows doesn't come with that; just a stub to get you to pay for a MS365 subscription. Linux actually has software that you enables you to write documents, work on spreadsheets and it can be compatible with the MS file formats.
Many games these days run better on Linux with the compatibility layers than they do on Windows; the platform they were written for.
Windows, for the home user, is rapidly becoming nothing more than a platform for delivering advertising and sucking more and more money from users, while Linux remains focused on productivity. The corporate user is being directed more and more towards thin client systems where the box on the desk runs Linux and connects to a remote Windows session. I think it won't be long before Microsoft gives up on Windows and switches to Linux with a Windows like presentation layer - desktop environment in Linux parlance - because it's cheaper and more secure. You can already get 95% of the way there with things like Zorin OS and the only things holding them back from working exactly like Windows are the legal issues.
Microsoft are already working on marketing a virtual desktop to consumers so they have even less control over their own system and data than they have right now.
Linux is very easy to install and use these days and you can use it to resurrect old PCs and get them working better than when they were new and using MS Windows.
With Linux, you can do all the things you need to do in all but edge cases and it opens up a whole new world of experiences if you want to go that far.
If you have an old PC that you can't use with Windows anymore, grab a copy of LinuxMint with the Mate desktop environment and install it. Or even run it from a bootable USB drive without disturbing the OS on your system. Give it a look and see just how good a current Linux distribution is. It will blow your socks off.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1