Youtube comments of (@dingokidneys).

  1. 261
  2. 162
  3. 147
  4. 140
  5. 137
  6. 132
  7. 126
  8. 86
  9. 84
  10. 76
  11. 58
  12. 55
  13. 54
  14. 49
  15. 41
  16. 38
  17. 38
  18. 34
  19. 30
  20. 25
  21. 24
  22. 21
  23. 20
  24. 18
  25. 18
  26. 17
  27. 17
  28. 17
  29. 15
  30. 15
  31. 14
  32. 13
  33. 12
  34. 12
  35. 12
  36. 11
  37. 10
  38. 10
  39. 10
  40. 10
  41. 10
  42. 9
  43. 9
  44. 9
  45. 9
  46. 9
  47. 9
  48. 8
  49. 8
  50. 8
  51. 8
  52. 8
  53. 8
  54. 8
  55. 7
  56. 7
  57. 7
  58. 7
  59. 7
  60. 7
  61. 7
  62. 7
  63. 7
  64. 7
  65. 7
  66. 7
  67. 6
  68. 6
  69. 6
  70. 6
  71. 6
  72. 6
  73. 6
  74. 6
  75. 6
  76. 6
  77. 6
  78. 6
  79. 6
  80. 5
  81. 5
  82. 5
  83. 5
  84. 5
  85. 5
  86. 5
  87. 5
  88. 5
  89. 5
  90. 5
  91. 5
  92. 5
  93. 5
  94. 5
  95. 5
  96. 5
  97. 5
  98. 5
  99. 5
  100. 4
  101. 4
  102. 4
  103. 4
  104. 4
  105. 4
  106. 4
  107. 4
  108. 4
  109. 4
  110. 4
  111. 4
  112. 4
  113. 4
  114. 4
  115. 4
  116. 4
  117. 4
  118. 4
  119. 4
  120. 4
  121. 4
  122. 4
  123. 4
  124. 4
  125. 4
  126. 4
  127. 4
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147.  @ITonOccasion  If you're new to tracking finances and especially if you don't have experience with accounting software, I'd be cautious about going all in on a SaaS solution like Wave. If you find it's not actually a good fit, trying to get your data out of these systems in a way that you can import into another can be difficult. They also often have unique work flows which can be confusing initially and, when you become used to them, make transitioning to a new system more confusing than it needs to be. For a real noob, I'd rather get them going on a spreadsheet - a simple cash book style layout - and probably an invoicing app like Tom outlined because it's easy to understand and it can lay down some core principles which then make transitioning to a more sophisticated accounting solution easier. If you then want to move on to a basic accounting system, I'd rather go with a local software package like GnuCash or KMyMoney because they support industry standard import/export file formats, you have total control of your data, and your personal and business details are not being leveraged to sell stuff to you and others. However, as I said earlier, use what works best for you. Different people understand and relate to things differently and if Wave works for you, that's great. I had a quick look at it (10 minutes or so) and it's got some nice features. There are also a few little traps for the unwary in there. Be good friends with your accountant. I'm not selling accounting services here but most small businesses go down the tube within the first two years of operation. Often that's because they didn't know where they were financially at all times. Sometimes this is because the book-keeping just gets on top of them which is a shame because if it's set up properly - for you - it can really be easy and be a great help. All the best.
    3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. 3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. 3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. I wouldn't be too quick to jump on the fire authorities "unpreparedness". This is the off season for them, a time when people can take vacations, when training can be done, and plans developed. Yes they are prepared to respond to fires but historically they have not had to respond to huge fires at this time of the year. Budget constraints make sure that the resources available will always be minimal, because who's going to fund more than absolutely, unequivocally demonstrated to be essential. That said, these fires took off in canyons with steep sides which acts like a chimney and causes the fire to develop much more quickly than usual. Once you get that much heat over such a significant area, as you observed yourself, the fire creates it's own weather which helps it to develop in unexpected ways. The embers that blow ahead of the fire cause spot overs that demand attention and spread any fire fighting effort out thinly. And this all probably started out from some person doing a foolish thing. One of the worst fires I attended, as crew, was started by two kids with a poorly managed barbeque who managed to knock it over. The fire took off and they fled. This was on an island and yet we had spot overs to the mainland about a mile away. You don't fight fires like this. You try to manage them by slowing their progress down, by diverting their weakest flanks back into the burnt area, by cutting fire breaks and hoping for a change in the wind and weather that works in your favour. You also get all the people and livestock that you can out of the path.
    2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. Work implemented SSH for transferring financial data between branch and head office systems in the early 2000's I guess. I was an accountant but very interested in computers and programming and so forth so for some reason it was dropped on me to get this set up - hey, it was financial data so a finance dude should do it right? I think the IT guy I was working with didn't know anything about it and was happy to leave it to me. I sat down to read the SSH man page from my own Linux system and really had a hard time getting my head around it. That is until I actually got hands-on and the fireworks went off in my head. It was so straight forward and so powerful. Public/private keys make perfect sense and I got the key exchange sorted out and things started to just work. There is so much you can do with SSH that would take so much more setup to do any other way. I set up tunnelling from work to my home system and was able to forward X windowing apps over it. When our bank upgraded their SSH service to one that was incompatible with the work Solaris system - work was slow to upgrade even though I was banging on doors and yelling about the dire things that would happen - I set up an AWS VPS that could relay the data via SSH between the bank and our systems until the upgrade finally came through. I wasn't going to put up with my work flow being stuffed up because work couldn't get their act together. Probably a massive faux pas as far as IT management would be concerned, but what they didn't know couldn't hurt them and I had the VPS bolted down pretty hard. :)
    1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. I am still wrapping my head around this. Sheeeeesh!!! I usually listen to Youtube videos at 1.5 time speed. I had to slow this one down to 0.75 to actually take in all the information being thrown at me and even then I had to back-track a couple of times to be sure I'd heard correctly or because I was still processing something that had been said earlier. And I'm not even from the USA. I'm from Australia which, strangely, seems to want to adopt everything that the USA does without much actual assessment of whether it makes sense for us or not. The US system of law enforcement has always seemed a bit weird to me with elected local Sheriff's departments and so forth. Here in Aus the state police, which is the lowest level of law enforcement, are a professional unit led by someone who is appointed based on merit rather than elected on the basis of a popularity contest. I get the US obsession with election as a way of selecting officials, but I think it is a method that doesn't scale the way they think it does. It was developed when the states were very much smaller and could not support a law enforcement 'profession. ' I think our law enforcement is getting worse because they are trying to adopt US law enforcement methods. There has been a definite up-tick in police shootings of people who exhibited mental problems, who might have been talked down if time was taken and empathy deployed. There is a definite portion of Australia who view the American way of doing things (whatever that is at the time) as the proper way to handle things. Personally, I think we should be more open to filtering what comes from America through a mesh of our own system of ethics and norms.
    1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. I've been using computers since the late '70's and, contrary to your assertion, Windows, which was based on DOS, was built to emulate Unix concepts. It did it very badly which is one of the reasons it's ended up quite a long way from Unix these days but it still has POSIX compliance to a point; it needed to have that to be acceptable to the US Government. When you install one of the major consumer oriented Linux distros, you get a system that doesn't require you to know anything about the command line interface and comes bundled with office type software - granted it is not Microsoft Office but even Windows doesn't come with that; just a stub to get you to pay for a MS365 subscription. Linux actually has software that you enables you to write documents, work on spreadsheets and it can be compatible with the MS file formats. Many games these days run better on Linux with the compatibility layers than they do on Windows; the platform they were written for. Windows, for the home user, is rapidly becoming nothing more than a platform for delivering advertising and sucking more and more money from users, while Linux remains focused on productivity. The corporate user is being directed more and more towards thin client systems where the box on the desk runs Linux and connects to a remote Windows session. I think it won't be long before Microsoft gives up on Windows and switches to Linux with a Windows like presentation layer - desktop environment in Linux parlance - because it's cheaper and more secure. You can already get 95% of the way there with things like Zorin OS and the only things holding them back from working exactly like Windows are the legal issues. Microsoft are already working on marketing a virtual desktop to consumers so they have even less control over their own system and data than they have right now. Linux is very easy to install and use these days and you can use it to resurrect old PCs and get them working better than when they were new and using MS Windows. With Linux, you can do all the things you need to do in all but edge cases and it opens up a whole new world of experiences if you want to go that far. If you have an old PC that you can't use with Windows anymore, grab a copy of LinuxMint with the Mate desktop environment and install it. Or even run it from a bootable USB drive without disturbing the OS on your system. Give it a look and see just how good a current Linux distribution is. It will blow your socks off.
    1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. Hey Louis, I commented on your previous video that this might be related to the initial set up of your business; i.e. buying a company from an accountant or lawyer. You later commented on that video; "I can't find it now, but yesterday, some guy said there were 60 other judgments/warrants/liens for the SAME DOLLAR AMOUNT as mine that were filed on the SAME WEEK as mine. I forget how he found that. It would be cool if someone else could show me how he found that. How much do you want to bet that ALL of those liens/judgments are to that same PO BOX?" This reinforces my idea that it might be a company set-up thing. When the postal worker said that the box was "vacant", it is vacant now. I doesn't mean that it was at the time stuff was being sent out to you and if stuff for other people was being sent at the same time to the same place, I'd guess that someone who had the mail box at that time was just binning all the mail. Find out who set up your company and where they were based, though sometimes I understand that companies are set up in other jurisdictions because of easier regulatory standards or cheaper costs. I'd just about bet that someone was setting up shelf companies using that PO box in Maine as the default address and one of those got sold on to you and then changed to "Rossman Repair Group". A stuff up by the lawyer/accountant changing the shelf company to your company would go some way to explaining the problem you've had as well as the story of many other similar problems. A systemic failure by one person's office.
    1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1