Comments by "Harry \x22Nic\x22 Nicholas" (@HarryNicNicholas) on "" video.
-
6
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
the consensus seems to change weekly but there's little to be gained from saying jesus wasn't an actual person, what most people probably don't know though is that according to some - paulogia - who has a counter-apologetics channel - seems to think there were 13 people called jesus in the historical record of the time, and sean mcdowell, a christian apologist who did his PhD on the martyrs said in a role play that there were 33 people called jesus at that time too, so, arguing the toss is a waste of breath.
what people like pinecreek doug like to point out is that there are NO eyewitnesses to the risen jesus, paul is the ONLY gospel where he states his name and that he saw the live jesus, and then only an apparition.
NONE of the other gospels state who they are, luke doesn't even have the word "luke" in it, quite apart from the fact that they have english names cause NO ONE knows who actually wrote those gospels. or why.
and my own three-penneth is to be "an eyewitness to the resurrection" you would have to be right next to jesus when he got up and went for coffee. there are no eyewitnesses "to the resurrection", christianity is based on one man having a hallucination of a dead man he never met.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1