Comments by "Manuell" (@manuell3505) on "Astrum" channel.

  1.  @CZPR  I just found that out. Thought they were the same class but they appear to be more solid with less gas. Actually, almost anything that can be visited is interesting. We must kill this lightyear-problem...
    16
  2. Who's stupid?
    5
  3.  @charlesbrightman4237  Fallacy of argument by question... And more intellectual dishonesty. You deliberately pull my symbolic expression of 'air' as 'nothing of content' into the context and demand some sort of scientific definition of that... I think you'r a fundamentalistic science-denier. Do you believe the ISS orbits the earth, with people inside?
    4
  4. Ice giants?
    4
  5.  @charlesbrightman4237  Here's a bias: "In the blink of an eye"... Using a unit of time to represent the beginning of time. Without any reference... Note that the actual beginning of any possible other event than what's called big bang also takes zero time.
    2
  6.  @charlesbrightman4237  I am dust ^^ Personal offence is the last resort for cowards...
    2
  7.  @charlesbrightman4237  You lost your game. I was right about what you are. You are here to discredit real knowledge, as it is your enemy. Bye.
    2
  8.  @johnunderwood-hp8rj  The problem here is the false "belief" that if one subscribes to any non-scientific fundamentals, it automatically provides authority on telling what is real. That's not how the real world works...
    2
  9. I saw this 25 years ago in Quake...
    1
  10. It sounds like a human beatbox. Scientists are still working on that...
    1
  11.  @metou3072  Indirectly you're claiming that if you let explode a grenade inside a box in a vacuum, nothing will happen to the box...
    1
  12.  @metou3072  None of my comments are deleted. We have a question waiting. Remember the 1st reaction... Good luck, hero!
    1
  13. Looks like you need another model. Wait....
    1
  14. Spacecraft entering atmosphere, followed by alien ships... Software: "detecting problem, going to safe mode". Aliens: "dammit, how do we reboot this?"
    1
  15. I might be wrong, but I was assuming that the randomness in orientation (axial vector and direction of rotation) of all galaxies that we can see is mathematically perfect. So, on a larger scale, the disk-behaviour doesn't seem to be present. Maybe dark matter and energy have a relation... Kant might have just been trying to visualize the traditional creation of a pizza by rotation...
    1
  16. I think it still mosly depends on big data. Who owns the most? While trying out various public AI question engines on software-engineering related subjects, I pulled the conclusion that just smart search engine usage isn't less efficient. 1 giant problem at this moment is the output of simply wrong information. They all hate to have no complete answer, thus fill in the gaps with assumed things. It's a commercial problem.
    1
  17.  @charlesbrightman4237 "one must define 'time'." For what? That's a dummy argument. It contains nothing but air. Time to get your books. ^^
    1
  18.  @charlesbrightman4237  God snapped his fingers and bang!
    1
  19. Not exaggerated at all. It's magnifying the peak to full screen. The scale is linear.
    1
  20. There's 1 problem with it: if you want to deny any scienficic data. your need your own data that shows something else. Fact: global warming like it happens now has never happened in recorded history, and it does correlate with the open combustion of fossil carbonates. Without 1 shred of doubt.
    1