Comments by "Wellness Path For Me" (@wellnesspathforme6236) on "The #1 Thing Stopping You From Losing Visceral Fat u0026 Building Muscle! | Sal Di Stefano" video.

  1. If cancer is an artifact of low mitochondrial energy production, perhaps the lack of exercise is an artifact of low mitochondrial function (which leads to cancer) more than exercise prevents cancer. Perhaps both are in play. But consider that your cause and effect flow could be, at least partially backwards. In practical terms, I would expect a person with compromised mitochondrial function to get cancer faster with aggressive exercise due to the increased oxidative stress caused by the extra acidic exhaust put out by damaged mitochondria. Perhaps depression is the body’s way of purposefully stopping such activity as a survival mechanism.
    5
  2. I had a friend who was very muscular — much more than I ever could be. He had a heart attack 10 years below my current age. I’m under muscled — been catabolic for decades. My diet was better — it had to be given my condition. But his muscle alone didn’t protect him. I think many confuse the effect with the cause. The cause is mitochondrial health. Healthy muscle is an expression of healthy mitochondria. However, some people’s bodies allow them to gain muscle even when their mitochondria is compromised. The muscles then require the essential mitochondrial nutrients (magnesium / copper) that become unavailable to, say, the heart. It’s the mitochondria, and it’s a complex system that most way over simplify. Muscle did not protect my friend and likely accelerated his heart attack. My lack of muscle — a literal inability to add muscle — likely prevented a heart attack in me. … My goal is to renutrify and detoxify my my mitochondria so that I can become anabolic with healthy mitochondria… That is the best of both worlds.
    3
  3.  @chrismacfly6122  Add in all the purposeful confusion and layers of deception. I no doubt still have a lot to learn. Give the children a fighting change because detoxing generational toxic loads when you are older is quite the challenge!
    2
  4. Re: body builders… the muscle building is correlation, and likely weak correlation. S. V. Knezevic et al., aimed did a study that revealed the all-cause mortality rate of body builders was 2.18 x higher than the average population. That’s 2.18x worse than HORRIBLE. Maybe they are dying so quickly the cancer doesn’t have time to pop up and kill them. The muscle is NOT protective against death, and the data was tortured here into giving a false confession. The death is a result of the mitochondria becoming compromised. This can happen with or without muscle. ^^^ Facts.
    2
  5. But what you eat can depress you, cause you to burn fewer calories, and then you gain weight at the same calorie intake because you feel like crap. Or the way you eat causes severe hunger pangs when there is a way to eat the same calories without the hunger pangs.
    2
  6.  @chrismacfly6122  You misconstrued my post completely. 1. The best scenario would be fully nutrified mitochondria and lots of muscle that is easily support by them. 2. The worst case is toxic and depleted mitochondria, but your body allows you to gain muscle to burn up even more mitochondrial nutrients and deprive, say, your heart of even more nutrients so that it fails sooner. 3. The 2nd worst scenario is that you mitochondria are compromised, but your body limits muscle growth allowing your heart to access more nutrients to function longer. Both 2 and 3 suck for scenarios. I’m in group 3, however, I think I figured this out and now I’m aggressively renutrifying my mitochondria and detoxing my epigenetics and mitochondria. My height increased almost 3/4” in my 50s — a totally unexpected benefit I didn’t believe at first. Everyone around my age is shrinking — my BIL by 2 inches and he was shorter than me to begin with. I also turned somewhat anabolic as well. IOW, I can now consistently add pushups, pulls, squats, etc. as I exercise over time. What is retarded, IMHO, is telling people with compromised mitochondria to just exercise more and it will fix all their problems. It might just deplete your heart’s mitochondria sooner, give you a heart attack sooner, and kill you sooner. It’s all in the mitochondria…
    1
  7. I'm going to argue you don't know that exercise is protective, only that it is correlated -- and you ASSUME it is causitive. I'm going to argue that efficient mitochondrial function is causitive for both the will and energy to exercise and better overall health. People with sufficient mitochondrial damage don't work out. I want to work out. I push myself too hard and my body shuts down... i feel like if I push too hard I could give myself a heart attack, or some other acute failure. I still work out as much as I can, but it isn't much. My friend who worked out a ton, had a heart attack about 10 years younger than I am now. Weight training did not protect him. In contrast, my body stopped allowing me to gain muscle on my bad diet at 21. A crippling nerve damage issue appeared then, so I was done for a while. I think it might have saved my live. If I burned up all my limited mitochondrial nutrients, I think it is likely I would have fallen over the cliff, instead of dancing around it. Anyway, I think you are misrepresenting what you know. Mitochondrial health is almost certainly the root cause of both the ability to exercise and long-term wellness. If someone's mitochondrial energetic nutrients are depleted, more exercise would seem to deplete those nutrients the heart needs to beat correctly, and would actually promote a heart attack. I have another friend who had a heart attack while out running... compared to me who was about 175 lbs when I turned 50 and dropped all the to a low of 146.5 lbs with almost no exercise... according to your theory, that's a blatant contradiction. My two friends should have been protected, yet they both had heart problems before me, and both are younger than me by a few years. The difference? When I had my energy crash, I began a massive effort to restore my mitochondrial energetic nutrients while they continued to toxify theirs with a poor diet. It is the mitochondrial health.... If you have any nutrients rate limiting the efficiency of the mitochondria, exercise will very likely damage and kill you faster... I believe that's why my energy / will / motivation crashed in a way that I didn't know was possible. It prevents me from burning Mg-ATP, and the nutrients required to make it, building muscle so my heart doesn't stop cold. The following was dug up in the scientific literature by Morley Robbins, a man who has spent well over 10,000 hours reading the scientific literature to discover what is driving the hockey-stick increase in disease. His book is Cure Your Fatigue. He has 100s of Youtube video interviews. Morley Robbins would be an excellent guest on your show. I've suffered an energy crash. Poor epigenetics (adopted child), poor diet, tons of stress from places that will make you run away (I'd be happy to go over the issues, but you will run away -- they are too big for people to ponder), and excessive zinc supplementation (stimulates metallothionein, which chelates copper) all conspired to cause my energy.will to crash. Copper is an essential nutrient for mitochondrial function. The 'chrome' in 'cytochrome c oxidase' refers to the color copper produces in that enzyme. Copper depletion is an agenda of the Money Power Allodials (think about it...). 1. Bio-active Copper is not on nutrition labels, 2. Bio-active Copper is not in NPK fertilizer, 3. Bio-active Copper is chelated by glyphosate so the body can't use it... or the animals it is fed to. 4. Bio-active Copper is stripped out of its activating protein/enzyme ceruloplasmin by ascorbic acid. In contrast, nature's whole food C has 4 copper atoms to donate to make Cp-Cu in every single molecule, 5. Bio-active Copper is depleted by excess calcium because calcium depletes magnesium, a mineral required to activate the ATP7B enzyme to load copper into ceruloplasmin to make the copper transportable and bio-active. 6. Bio-active Copper is depleted by vitamin D supplementation because it upregulates calcium absorption at the expense of magnesium and it depletes retinol, which is the parent of retinoic acid, another nutrient required by ATP7B to load copper into ceruloplasmin. Nature complexes about 10x retinol relative to vitamin D. 7. Vitamin D testing is a big hoax, a obvious lie that everyone seems to love too much to question. D has two forms -- storage and active. Testing only storage and declaring active must be low is NOT SCIENCE. It is pysence, and you've been duped. Low storage D can correlate with high active D, which correlates with high oxidative stress. The D supplements promote the oxidative stress long term by depleting ceruplasmin-bound copper (Cp-Cu), which regulates iron recycling, ensures oxygen is efficiently turned to energy in the mitochondria, and energizes all the antioxidant enzymes, which will fail without copper present. Cp-Cu is both the necessary transport mechanism and a fully functional enzyme in its own right. excess calcium depletes magnesium, which is required to complex copper atoms with ceruloplasmin, Vitamin D supplements turbocharge calcium (and deplete magnesium and bio-copper) and deplete retinol, which is the parent of retinoic acid, an other substrate required to complex copper with ceruloplasmin (ATP7B).
    1