Comments by "Wellness Path For Me" (@wellnesspathforme6236) on "Bitcoin University"
channel.
-
1
-
From a Rothschild Q&A posted around 2011 (the guy is real -- just read... he's 100% right... nobody else says this)
"Well, of course, a man pays what he owes!
If you owe a debt, then settle it.
However, make sure you understand EACH and EVERY one of those terms.
Laughing out Loud!
Although overall you appear to be something of a dim-bulb...and against
my better judgment, let's walk the walk a bit here...shall we?
Firstly, you DID grasp the essence of Jesus' wisdom. Another commonly
heard phrase is "live by the sword, die by the sword"...one will not die
the death of a swordsman if one is NOT of that profession. Not to say a
non-swordsman cannot die by the sword...simply that it is NOT a
swordsman, but rather a civilian, doing the dying.
Why is that
relevant? Because EVERYTHING is relevant. Ignore nothing...assume
nothing! THAT, cretins, is as fine a starting point as any.
ASSUME NOTHING...check EVERYTHING!
NOW, dimwitty, let's look at a few things here.
I advised you, and others, to learn the basics of contract
law....rooted in common law, and used as the basis of most western legal
systems.
Contracts can attach in more than one way. Go and
study on this and report back to me so that I see your questioning is
sincere and you are not just another lazy "seeker" of the sort who have
fouled this work to date.
Once you understand the various points of contractual engagement, THEN you can begin to ask the correct questions...
1) From where does the taxation authority used to enforce my
subjugation flow? Look up subjugation if you do not understand this
term.
2) What are the terms of contract law which are being
applied in the relationship between "me" and the taxing authority.
Again, back to contract law...offer/consideration/performance etc.
3) What do I give and what do I get?
4) Who are the parties to the transaction?
5) How may one or the other terminate the agreement, by, say breach, non-performance or voluntarily?
6) In the event of contract termination, what are the remedies available to the breached party.
Now, some basic questions. By what authority do you CLAIM to own the property in question?
By what authority BACKS UP this claim? In other words, if some real or
artificial person made CLAIM that they, in fact, owned the
property...how would that claim be adjudicated? Would YOU accept the
results of the arbitration?
What would your recourse be if the decision rendered was one you did not agree with?
Property ownership is a primitive concept...rooted in history, but not a
universal one. Native Americans conceptually lacked understanding of
property ownership that Europeans and Americans take for granted.
However, if an intruder were to encroach on the space which they
occupied at any particular point, they would likely fight to the death,
would they not? They would not, however, define the land as theirs, as
that was absurd to them on its face.
They didn't own the land, but on the land which they chose to occupy, they would fight to the death to defend it.
Those Native Americans had a more evolved understanding of property
rights than westerners. One does not truly own land, but one DOES
control what land one can, while one can.
A young man might, in
this scenario, stake a claim on a small patch of land somewhere and not
allow others to pass. If the young man were able to ENFORCE his claim,
he would indeed control that parcel. Does he own it? In a sense it is
supposed. He can do with it as he chooses.
As an old man, others
may challenge his ownership. If he prevails, he continues
ownership...if not, ownership/control passes to the other.
This example is the sense of ownership in its pure form.
Of course, groups of humans may band together and set rules with
various and sundry methods of registration and dispute resolution based
on the common good....
Of course, such systems may be completely
infiltrated and corrupted beyond the most wild imaginations limits, but
that is another story for another time...
Laughing out Loud!
Anyway, by what methodology do you claim the authority that you are the owner of the land?
If this methodology is administered by some other authority, have you
granted this authority to act in the interests of the greater whole? Or
does the taxing authority have any specific duties to represent YOUR
interests? If so or not, what are the limits and operational rules?
See...again, how does one think they have RIGHTS when they submit to an
authority structure to which they have no basic understanding of the
rules of engagement?
Stupid!
Unless you do some work to
learn the rules under which you operate, you will be serfs FOREVER! And I
can guarantee this will be the outcome for your LOT.
Stupid cretins!
OK. There will be no intelligent signs of life so no point continuing.
Just for amusement purposes, ONE of you show some initiative and send
your local land taxing authority a letter of inquiry. Ask them some
iteration of the following:
1) By what authority do you levy a tax against my property?
2) Do you, as a taxing authority assert any claim of ownership, lien,
attachment, encumbrance or otherwise, against the parcel in question
3) Has the parcel in question been pledged as collateral, generally or
specifically, in any capacity whatsoever against any debt or obligation
of a governmental agency or private entity?
4) Is there any claim
recorded against this property, and are there any arrears or payments
due to release any prior claims in order for clear title.
5) What is the procedure and amount necessary to obtain allodial title for the property in question
6) What is the procedure to have the property in question removed from the tax roles?
General questions:
1) By what methodology is the tax applied to assure an impartial apportionment of the tax burden.
2) If property valuation is the operational methodology, why is an objective measure, such as square meter not used instead.
3) How many parcels are defined in the area of the taxing authority.
4) What is the total area of the taxing authority, and of this area, how many are taxable parcels.
5) Of the untaxed parcels and land, list each and every reason why these properties are not taxed.
6) How many properties have received tax exemptions, and what is the lawful basis of exemption? etc etc.
Start doing research and start asking questions. It would be fitting if
a few of you figured out the property tax fraud, since it is the basis
of all the other frauds as well."
~Rothschild from 2011-ish Q&A
1