Comments by "Arty" (@arty5876) on "Just how well trained is the Russian army? (And are its logistics up to the task?)" video.
-
Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
6
-
3
-
Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
3
-
Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian - Russian and Ukrainian armies have the same level of corruption, training and logistics. In terms of economy and life standarts Ukraine is much worser than Russia, so, Ukraine have lower economical resources per every soldier, than Russia. The only 2 reasons, why Russia had failed:
1) Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother Slavic people, a lot of Russians have relarives in Ukraine, this war totally unpopular in Russia, and Russian army have low morale, because they don't want to shoot the brother people.
2) Russian command probably believed in their own anti-Ukrainian propaganda, and they were thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine in 3 days, and they attacked Ukraine without planning to face the resistance, without planning the logistics and without numerical superiority. Russians had invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority, while attcking side by all laws of millitarian science is suffering more casualities. This war isn't showing to us the real fighting capability of the Russian army.
Russian army isn't lesser trained, than Ukrainian. The logistics in the Russian army aren't worser than in Ukraine. Ukraine isn't lesser corrupt than Russia. Ukrainian economy before the war was worser, than Russian economy after the war and sanctions. Stop watching the propaganda about "incompetence" of the Russian army - Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian. The only reason of Russian failure is a low suppourt of the war from the population of Russia and unprepared invasion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Russians had invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority, while Ukraine is the largest land millitary in Europe after Russia. Ukraine have far more tanks, than Germany, Poland, Britain or France. Russian and Ukrainian armies have the same level of training, logistics and equipment, but Ukraine have worser economy and life standarts, than Russia. So, Ukraine have lower ammount of economical resources per every soldier. If the quality of troops is equal, according to the law of millitary science attacking side is suffering more casualities. Ukraine isn't lesser corrupt than Russia, Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian army.
The only 2 reasons, why Russian invasion had failed:
1) Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother Slavic people, a lot of Russians have relatives in Ukraine, probably some Russian soldiers have relarives in Ukraine, and war is totally unpopular in Russia. Russian soldiers are mentally and morally supressed, they don't want to fight against brother Slavic people. Opposite - Ukrainians have moral boom, they are fighting for their homeland.
2) Russian command probably believed in its own propaganda, and commanders in Kremlin were thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine in 3 days without resistance, and Russian troops would be met with flowers. And Russian command simply didn't prepared for a war - Russians didn't planned, that they would face the resistance, they thought that they would take all of Ukraine in 3 days, and this is why Russians at now have poor logistics and preparation.
1
-
Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian - Russian and Ukrainian armies have the same level of corruption, training and logistics. In terms of economy and life standarts Ukraine is much worser than Russia, so, Ukraine have lower economical resources per every soldier, than Russia. The only 2 reasons, why Russia had failed:
1) Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother Slavic people, a lot of Russians have relarives in Ukraine, this war totally unpopular in Russia, and Russian army have low morale, because they don't want to shoot the brother people.
2) Russian command probably believed in their own anti-Ukrainian propaganda, and they were thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine in 3 days, and they attacked Ukraine without planning to face the resistance, without planning the logistics and without numerical superiority. Russians had invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority, while attcking side by all laws of millitarian science is suffering more casualities. This war isn't showing to us the real fighting capability of the Russian army.
Russian army isn't lesser trained, than Ukrainian. The logistics in the Russian army aren't worser than in Ukraine. Ukraine isn't lesser corrupt than Russia. Ukrainian economy before the war was worser, than Russian economy after the war and sanctions. Stop watching the propaganda about "incompetence" of the Russian army - Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian. The only reason of Russian failure is a low suppourt of the war from the population of Russia and unprepared invasion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian - Russian and Ukrainian armies have the same level of corruption, training and logistics. In terms of economy and life standarts Ukraine is much worser than Russia, so, Ukraine have lower economical resources per every soldier, than Russia. The only 2 reasons, why Russia had failed:
1) Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother Slavic people, a lot of Russians have relarives in Ukraine, this war totally unpopular in Russia, and Russian army have low morale, because they don't want to shoot the brother people.
2) Russian command probably believed in their own anti-Ukrainian propaganda, and they were thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine in 3 days, and they attacked Ukraine without planning to face the resistance, without planning the logistics and without numerical superiority. Russians had invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority, while attcking side by all laws of millitarian science is suffering more casualities. This war isn't showing to us the real fighting capability of the Russian army.
Russian army isn't lesser trained, than Ukrainian. The logistics in the Russian army aren't worser than in Ukraine. Ukraine isn't lesser corrupt than Russia. Ukrainian economy before the war was worser, than Russian economy after the war and sanctions. Stop watching the propaganda about "incompetence" of the Russian army - Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian. The only reason of Russian failure is a low suppourt of the war from the population of Russia and unprepared invasion.
1
-
1
-
@aluisious Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
1
-
1
-
Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
1
-
Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
1
-
Russians had invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority, while Ukraine is the largest land millitary in Europe after Russia. Ukraine have far more tanks, than Germany, Poland, Britain or France. Russian and Ukrainian armies have the same level of training, logistics and equipment, but Ukraine have worser economy and life standarts, than Russia. So, Ukraine have lower ammount of economical resources per every soldier. If the quality of troops is equal, according to the law of millitary science attacking side is suffering more casualities. Ukraine isn't lesser corrupt than Russia, Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian army.
The only 2 reasons, why Russian invasion had failed:
1) Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother Slavic people, a lot of Russians have relatives in Ukraine, probably some Russian soldiers have relarives in Ukraine, and war is totally unpopular in Russia. Russian soldiers are mentally and morally supressed, they don't want to fight against brother Slavic people. Opposite - Ukrainians have moral boom, they are fighting for their homeland.
2) Russian command probably believed in its own propaganda, and commanders in Kremlin were thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine in 3 days without resistance, and Russian troops would be met with flowers. And Russian command simply didn't prepared for a war - Russians didn't planned, that they would face the resistance, they thought that they would take all of Ukraine in 3 days, and this is why Russians at now have poor logistics and preparation.
1
-
Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
1
-
Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
1
-
@Max-kd2gh I was wrong when I said in March that reinforcements would help the Russians win. Because the Russians didn't have any reinforcements at that time. Russia fought without mobilization until September 21, and conscripts still do not take part in the war. Roughly speaking, Russia did not fight against Ukraine in full force for the first 7 months, using only 1/3 of its ground forces. On February 24, the ratio of the number of the two armies was equal, despite the fact that the defending side has an advantage in losses, other things being equal. However, on September 21, Putin announced mobilization. He announced it late, because Ukraine has been mobilizing since February 24, and the Ukrainian army has grown significantly in numbers over the 8 months of the war. Actually, Ukraine's victories and Russia's failures at the front are due stupidly to the fact that the Ukrainian army has a numerical advantage of one and a half to two times. There is a lot of Ukrainian cannon fodder, Russian artillery does not have time to shoot everyone, thanks to the numerical superiority of the Ukrainian army wins. But nothing, Russia has announced mobilization, now the Russian army will grow in number, and Ukraine will not win this war. The population of Russia is 3.5 times larger than the population of Ukraine. The Russian economy before the war was 10 times larger than the Ukrainian one, while the Ukrainian economy suffered much more from the war than the Russian one from sanctions. Russia's military-industrial complex is huge. Ukraine will not win this war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
1
-
Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
1
-
Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian - Russian and Ukrainian armies have the same level of corruption, training and logistics. In terms of economy and life standarts Ukraine is much worser than Russia, so, Ukraine have lower economical resources per every soldier, than Russia. The only 2 reasons, why Russia had failed:
1) Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother Slavic people, a lot of Russians have relarives in Ukraine, this war totally unpopular in Russia, and Russian army have low morale, because they don't want to shoot the brother people.
2) Russian command probably believed in their own anti-Ukrainian propaganda, and they were thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine in 3 days, and they attacked Ukraine without planning to face the resistance, without planning the logistics and without numerical superiority. Russians had invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority, while attcking side by all laws of millitarian science is suffering more casualities. This war isn't showing to us the real fighting capability of the Russian army.
Russian army isn't lesser trained, than Ukrainian. The logistics in the Russian army aren't worser than in Ukraine. Ukraine isn't lesser corrupt than Russia. Ukrainian economy before the war was worser, than Russian economy after the war and sanctions. Stop watching the propaganda about "incompetence" of the Russian army - Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian. The only reason of Russian failure is a low suppourt of the war from the population of Russia and unprepared invasion.
1
-
Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
1
-
Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Brusanan what about the massive civillian deaths from the US invasion of Iraq? US soldiers are also Naz/s? A lot of civillians were dying in the conflicts, led by America. So, if you consider civillian deaths as a factor, after which you can call someone as a Naz/, so, Americans are Naz/s, because they were massively killing civillians in Iraq, Vietnam and Lybia. During the Vietnam war American aviation was spreading the chemical and bactereological wepons over the Vietnamese territory, including villages and cities. Agent orange, the chemicat, that causes scary mutaions of body of the infants. Hirosima and Nagasaki. The civillian deaths can't be called the genocide, and the commiters can't be named Naz/s, because artillery crew don't know, where the shell would fall. The genocide is the situation, when you target is killing of civillians, but at now in Ukraine the situation is different. Russians are targeting the millitary objects, but from accidential hits civillians are also suffering. According to your logic, Americans are main Naz/s in the World, because this is America, who caused most of civillian deaths in the war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian - Russian and Ukrainian armies have the same level of corruption, training and logistics. In terms of economy and life standarts Ukraine is much worser than Russia, so, Ukraine have lower economical resources per every soldier, than Russia. The only 2 reasons, why Russia had failed:
1) Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother Slavic people, a lot of Russians have relarives in Ukraine, this war totally unpopular in Russia, and Russian army have low morale, because they don't want to shoot the brother people.
2) Russian command probably believed in their own anti-Ukrainian propaganda, and they were thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine in 3 days, and they attacked Ukraine without planning to face the resistance, without planning the logistics and without numerical superiority. Russians had invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority, while attcking side by all laws of millitarian science is suffering more casualities. This war isn't showing to us the real fighting capability of the Russian army.
Russian army isn't lesser trained, than Ukrainian. The logistics in the Russian army aren't worser than in Ukraine. Ukraine isn't lesser corrupt than Russia. Ukrainian economy before the war was worser, than Russian economy after the war and sanctions. Stop watching the propaganda about "incompetence" of the Russian army - Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian. The only reason of Russian failure is a low suppourt of the war from the population of Russia and unprepared invasion.
1
-
Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian - Russian and Ukrainian armies have the same level of corruption, training and logistics. In terms of economy and life standarts Ukraine is much worser than Russia, so, Ukraine have lower economical resources per every soldier, than Russia. The only 2 reasons, why Russia had failed:
1) Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother Slavic people, a lot of Russians have relarives in Ukraine, this war totally unpopular in Russia, and Russian army have low morale, because they don't want to shoot the brother people.
2) Russian command probably believed in their own anti-Ukrainian propaganda, and they were thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine in 3 days, and they attacked Ukraine without planning to face the resistance, without planning the logistics and without numerical superiority. Russians had invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority, while attcking side by all laws of millitarian science is suffering more casualities. This war isn't showing to us the real fighting capability of the Russian army.
Russian army isn't lesser trained, than Ukrainian. The logistics in the Russian army aren't worser than in Ukraine. Ukraine isn't lesser corrupt than Russia. Ukrainian economy before the war was worser, than Russian economy after the war and sanctions. Stop watching the propaganda about "incompetence" of the Russian army - Ukrainian army isn't better trained, than Russian. The only reason of Russian failure is a low suppourt of the war from the population of Russia and unprepared invasion.
1
-
1
-
Ukrainian army's logistics and training aren't better than Russian, while Ukrainian economy is much worser than Russian in terms of life standarts and effectivity of labor, so Ukraine have much lower economical resources per every soldier than Russia. So, if you think that Russia would be exhausted, so, Ukraine would be exhausted 3 times to the time while this would happen.
The war in Ukraine doesn't shows to us the real fighting capability of Russian army. Russian failure in Ukraine have two reasons: Russian soldiers aren't motivated to fight against brother people, and Russian command didn't prepared for a war - they were probably thinking, that they would take all of Ukraine without a fight in 3 days. And Russians didn't prepared for a war. Russians invaded Ukraine without numerical superiority and without preparing the logistics. Probably, Putin believed in his own propaganda about "n-zis in Ukraine that are supressing their own people" , and probably Putin was thinking, that Ukrainian people would meet Russian soldiers with flowers.
This war in Ukraine isn't showing to us the real fighting capability and real quality of Russian army. In reality, Russian army isn't lesser trained than Ukrainian and isn't lesser equipped.
At now Russia is supplying frontline by reinforcements, and with numerical superiority on the Russian side Ukraine wouldn't stand a chance.
1