Comments by "Arty" (@arty5876) on "Ukraine 2014 | Vladimir Putin Announces Crimea Annexation | The New York Times" video.
-
In Crimea in 2014 and until 2014, 60% of the population were Russians, 24% Tatars and 16% Ukrainians. Russians in Crimea until 2014 were 60% of the population, and only 16% of Ukrainians. Crimea is an absolutely Russian territory, where the majority of the population is Russian, and Ukrainians are a minority of the population. It's just that Crimea, by mistake of the Soviet government, became part of Ukraine in 1954. But this is Russian territory. And in 2014, this Russian territory returned to its native harbor with the full support of the local population. And the Ukrainian army left the Crimea without a fight, giving it to our troops, which again proves that this is Russian territory. Because if it was Ukrainian land, the Ukrainians would not have given it away without firing a shot.
3
-
In Crimea in 2014 and until 2014, 60% of the population were Russians, 24% Tatars and 16% Ukrainians. Russians in Crimea until 2014 were 60% of the population, and only 16% of Ukrainians. Crimea is an absolutely Russian territory, where the majority of the population is Russian, and Ukrainians are a minority of the population. It's just that Crimea, by mistake of the Soviet government, became part of Ukraine in 1954. But this is Russian territory. And in 2014, this Russian territory returned to its native harbor with the full support of the local population. And the Ukrainian army left the Crimea without a fight, giving it to our troops, which again proves that this is Russian territory. Because if it was Ukrainian land, the Ukrainians would not have given it away without firing a shot.
2
-
So tell me, at least one country in the UN, which in March 2014 voted against Russia over Crimea, generally understood the issue of what happened? That's where Russia, Ukraine and Crimea are located geographically, and where, say, Brazil is located geographically. These are different parts of the world. And what do you think, do Australians, Argentines, Mexicans or Thais have anything to do with Russia, Ukraine and Crimea? No. They didn’t even understand the essence of the problem, they didn’t understand what happened, who was right and who was wrong, they didn’t understand history, but they, without understanding, voted against Russia. But when America bombed Serbia for the sake of secession of Kosovo, this was ignored by the UN
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Russia, since 2014, has been trying to resolve the conflict peacefully, diplomatically for 8 years. However, the Minsk agreements, according to which the Donbass was to become part of Ukraine as autonomous Russian republics, no one wanted to fulfill. In 2021, Russia held talks with NATO in Switzerland. It is not surprising that when the diplomatic methods of solving the problem were exhausted, the war broke out. It couldn't have been otherwise. Always after the failure of the negotiations starts the war. As for Russia, for 8 years Russia tried to push the Donbass back into Ukraine, but Ukraine did not want to comply with the Minsk agreements and got a war. In fact, the Minsk agreements were a sham for Russia. Ukraine was given 8 years to prepare
1
-
In Crimea in 2014 and until 2014, 60% of the population were Russians, 24% Tatars and 16% Ukrainians. Russians in Crimea until 2014 were 60% of the population, and only 16% of Ukrainians. Crimea is an absolutely Russian territory, where the majority of the population is Russian, and Ukrainians are a minority of the population. It's just that Crimea, by mistake of the Soviet government, became part of Ukraine in 1954. But this is Russian territory. And in 2014, this Russian territory returned to its native harbor with the full support of the local population. And the Ukrainian army left the Crimea without a fight, giving it to our troops, which again proves that this is Russian territory. Because if it was Ukrainian land, the Ukrainians would not have given it away without firing a shot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gincha7996 So tell me, at least one country in the UN, which in March 2014 voted against Russia over Crimea, generally understood the issue of what happened? That's where Russia, Ukraine and Crimea are located geographically, and where, say, Brazil is located geographically. These are different parts of the world. And what do you think, do Australians, Argentines, Mexicans or Thais have anything to do with Russia, Ukraine and Crimea? No. They didn’t even understand the essence of the problem, they didn’t understand what happened, who was right and who was wrong, they didn’t understand history, but they, without understanding, voted against Russia. But when America bombed Serbia for the sake of secession of Kosovo, this was ignored by the UN
1
-
So tell me, at least one country in the UN, which in March 2014 voted against Russia over Crimea, generally understood the issue of what happened? That's where Russia, Ukraine and Crimea are located geographically, and where, say, Brazil is located geographically. These are different parts of the world. And what do you think, do Australians, Argentines, Mexicans or Thais have anything to do with Russia, Ukraine and Crimea? No. They didn’t even understand the essence of the problem, they didn’t understand what happened, who was right and who was wrong, they didn’t understand history, but they, without understanding, voted against Russia. But when America bombed Serbia for the sake of secession of Kosovo, this was ignored by the UN
1
-
1
-
1