Comments by "Arty" (@arty5876) on "The first Ukrainian F-16 crashed | Rapid advances continue in Pokrovsk [29 August 2024]" video.
-
Russia have upper hand as a result of Russian strategy - war of attrition, that was choosen by Russian comand in late 2022. Russian production of artillery shells is 3 times larger than of entire NATO alliance, and North Korean help is small part of what Russia produces by itself. Russia may have even bigger superiority over Ukraine, if Russia had mobilization. But currently Russia is fighting without mobilization, by using only volunteers. Ukraine was mobilizing since the start of the war, and after 2.5 years or war Ukraine simply ran out of manpower, Ukrainian police is catching Ukrainian men on streets like animanls. And Zelensky made a very silly and mistaken move by invading Kursk region of Russia while Ukrainian army have manpower shortages. So, Ukrainian defensive capabilities in the Donbass region have decreased, while for Ukraine Donbass is most important area, because this is highly populated urban area where one city is being right after another city, urban area is good for defense and hard to attack. Also, since 2014 to 2022, for 8 years Ukraine was building a defensive lines, bunkers and fortifications in this area, and also Ukraine have superiority of landscape. Russia is fighting without mobilization, so Russia have less soldiers than Ukraine, while Ukraine is defending on good landscape with best on the Planet defensive line and support from the West. But if you look on the map, you can see that it is Russia who is advancing, not Ukraine. So, despite the fact that Ukraine have more soldiers than Russia and all other advantages, it seems like Russia have some bigger and more sufficient advantage over Ukraine in something else - artillery, the God of War. Also Russia organised massive production of FPV drones since 2023, and at now there are a parity in usage of drones on both sides. So, if in the start of the war it was Russia who was backward in this technology, at now it is Ukraine who is backward and Russian drone production is increasing. Also Russia modernized its aviation equipping it with 3000 kilogramms bombs and navigation systems for more precise heats. Thus, we can clearly see, that it is Ukraine who is fighting with quantity, while Russia is fighting with quality and casuality ratio is nearly equal if we combine all advantages of both sides.
With regards to Western help to Ukraine, after 2.5 years of war it is clear that United States don't want Ukraine to win. Russia is strategic enemy of USA, and USA want the war of attrition against Russia to last for as long as possible to cause damage to Russia. So, this is why USA have a GOAL to NOT give to Ukraine sufficient amount of military help. Ukraine was tricked by its Western partners, Western powers have a conspiracy deal to give to Ukraine insuffifient amount of help in order to war against Russia to be endless
7
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@celebrim1 you are talking nonesence and fake news of second-sort yellow media. About Alaska - it were a fake news from second-sort and unpopular Western media in december 2023, Western media showed a fake scan of a document allegedly signed by Putin, which allegedly spoke about recognizing Alaska as Russian territory, but all this is not true, this document does not exist and Putin did not sign anything. It's just a fake. None of popular Western magazines like CNN or BBC ever showed this news. It were second sort "no name media"
This is the first time I've heard about Finland, about the corridor to Kaliningrad between Poland and Lithuania - this is also the first time I've heard that Russia says it wants to seize it. I have only heard about this corridor from Western media and Western military analysts who say that in the event of a hypothetical war between Russia and NATO, this will be the most important thing for Russia, because Kaliningrad is isolated from the rest of Russia, but Russia itself has never said such a thing. At the same time it actually Poland who has been conducting military exercises for 20 years near the Russian border, where Poles are practicing the seizure of Russian territories. Russia has never conducted such military exercises near Polish border. You are talking complete nonsense, or rather the Western media is talking complete nonsense to keep the people in fear of Russia, to use Russia as a boogeyman for propaganda purposes, because the NATO alliance is a tool with which the United States spreads its influence over Europe. In 1945, after the Second World War, Europe lay in ruins, the economy was at the bottom. And then the Americans came and said that those states that join NATO will receive economic and financial assistance in debt from the United States - the so-called Marshall Plan. Read about the Marshall Plan. America is simply using NATO to put Europe in a dependent position. In 1951, the USSR applied to join NATO, because if we are in the same alliance, we will not pose threats to each other. The USSR's application to join NATO was rejected, which for Stalin became a clear signal that the NATO alliance is neither defensive nor peaceful, but an aggressive bloc of American imperialism, which is needed to divide and rule - to quarrel, to push Russia and Europe against each other. Russia is part of Europe, Russia is part of the European family, and the United States does everything to ignite a conflict between Russia and Europe, because until 2022, Russia was a competitor for Americans in the European gas and oil market. After the collapse of the USSR, Russia sought to join the European Union and NATO, and in 2002, Russia's application to join NATO was rejected when the whole of Europe was not against it. Russian Russian gas and oil are being cut off in Europe, and the economy is in recession, and Americans are buying Russian oil and gas on the black market and selling it to Europe at three times the price. Divide and rule
1
-
After the collapse of Soviet Union Russia turned a blind eye to the fact that Russian territories with a Russian population were part of Ukraine, as long as Ukraine was friendly to Russia. But Russia can no longer allow Ukraine to own Russian lands with a Russian population, when an illegal coup took place in Ukraine in 2014 and a radical change of power happened to anti-Russian. Russian people, who make up the vast majority of the Crimean population, wanted to separate from Ukraine and return to Russia back in 1994, there was separatism back in the nineties. In 1994, the government of Ukraine was friendly to the government of Russia, since the President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, as well as the Presidents of Ukraine and Belarus, destroyed the Soviet Union together, and were friendly to each other. Untill Ukraine had at least NEUTRAL relationship with Russia, Russia wasn't interested in conquering anything. But in 2014, when there were mass protests of the local population in Crimea with the desire to secede from Ukraine, Russia could no longer betray and abandon its Russian people to their fate, and Russian troops peacefully and without a single shot came and occupied Crimea, which the local Russian population is still happy about, Crimea returned home in 2014. However, the Russian troops did not go further, did not capture the whole of Ukraine, because then this was not the goal, Russia did not want to capture Ukraine. If Russia had wanted to take over Ukraine in 2014, Russia would have easily done it in a month, without encountering any resistance from Ukrainian troops. Russia tried to avoid war, Russia tried to avoid conflict with the West, Russia tried to avoid sanctions, and the only reason why the war began in 2022 is because Ukraine wanted to take revenge, Ukraine wanted to regain Donetsk and Lugansk, which for some reason it considers its cities and territories, although the Russian people there rebelled for independence back in 2014. If Russia had not attacked Ukraine in 2022, the war would have started anyway, just in that case, Ukraine would have attacked the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics first. There is a saying - when a fight is inevitable, strike first. A fight was inevitable, Russia didn't wanted this, but Russia striked first
1
-
@celebrim1 youtube censorship is cleaning my comments because they don't want to truth spread through freedom of speech.
About your claims that Russian state TV said that Russia wants to conquer Poland, Alaska and etc. - This is FAKE. Russian government or Putin never claimed this.
About Alaska - in december 2023 second-sort and unpopular magazines of Western media showed a fake scan of a document allegedly signed by Putin, which allegedly spoke about recognizing Alaska as Russian territory, but all this is not true, this document does not exist and Putin did not sign anything. It's just a fake news from low popular second-sort media, non of famous Western magazines ever claimed this.
This is the first time I've heard about Finland, about the corridor to Kaliningrad between Poland and Lithuania - this is also the first time I've heard that Russia says it wants to seize it. I have only heard about this corridor from Western media and Western military analysts who say that in the event of a hypothetical war between Russia and NATO, this will be the most important for Russia, because Kaliningrad is isolated from the rest of Russia, and in case of war no matter who attacks, Russia will try to connect Kaliningrad with Belarus. But Russia itself has never said such a thing that it wants to conquer this land. At the same time it is actually Poland who has been conducting military exercises for 20 years near the Russian border, where Poles are practicing the seizure of Russian territories. Russia has never conducted such military exercises near Polish border. You are talking complete nonsense, or rather the Western media is talking complete nonsense to keep the people in fear of Russia, to use Russia as a boogeyman for propaganda purposes, because the NATO alliance is a tool with which the United States spreads its influence over Europe. In 1945, after the Second World War, Europe lay in ruins, the economy was at the bottom. And then the Americans came and said that those states that join NATO will receive economic and financial assistance in debt from the United States - the so-called Marshall Plan. Read about the Marshall Plan. America is simply using NATO to put Europe in a dependent position. In 1951, the USSR applied to join NATO, because if we are in the same alliance, we will not pose threats to each other. The USSR's application to join NATO was rejected, which for Stalin became a clear signal that the NATO alliance is neither defensive nor peaceful, but an aggressive bloc of American imperialism, which is needed to divide and rule - to quarrel, to push Russia and Europe against each other. Russia is part of Europe, Russia is part of the European family, and the United States does everything to ignite a conflict between Russia and Europe, because until 2022, Russia was a competitor for Americans in the European gas and oil market. After the collapse of the USSR, Russia sought to join the European Union and NATO, and in 2002, Russia's application to join NATO was rejected when the whole of Europe was not against it. Russian gas and oil are being cut off in Europe, so European industry is decreading and the economy is in recession, and what Americans are doing? Americans are buying Russian oil and gas on the black market through Russian shadow trade fleet, and selling it to Europe at three times the price. Divide and rule
1
-
@celebrim1 you are talking nonesence. Your quote:
"Russian troops entered the Donbass, fomented the rebellion, started an ethnic cleaning program, and Ukraine at the time after having gotten wiped out already had no army to speak off" (c)
This is just ridiculous nonesence. First of all, according to Ukraine, Russian troops crossed the Ukrainian border only in september 2014, while the wat in the Donbass have started on april 2014. Russian troops have crossed the Ukrainian border after HALF OF A YEAR of war. War was already ongoing for half of year when Russian troops showed up on the frontline first time in the entire war. And how the Russians fomented rebellion? How it is even possible to foment the rebellion, when Russians are 50% of population of this region and there were massive protests, and vaste majority of men who were fighting against Ukrainian army were LOCALS. It were mostly LOCALS from the Donbass region who fought against Ukrainian army. Russian military came to save them only after half of a year of war, because they were at the blink of collapse. Everything you have said is just wrong - Ukrainian army had both numerical and technical superiority over rebels, and after half of year of war Ukraine was very close to victory, it seemed like Ukrainian victory is inevitable, and then at the last monent Russian forces crossed the border and saved Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics. And Russian force was very small, something like 4 thousand soldiers, one brigade, because Putin wanted this intervention to be a secret. So, in fact there were 30-40 thousand rebels, few thousand Russian volunteers in DPR and LPR militias and few thousand Russian troops against 60-70 thousand Ukrainian army. And this war was fought mostly by Russian people from Donetsk and Luhansk who wanted to separate from Ukraine. Russian helping force was 3-5 thousand men, and because of mush higher quality Russia was able to achieve victories with this one brigade.
Ethnic cleaning program? What are you talking about, you are brainwashed zombie. Tell me more about this program lol
1
-
1
-
@celebrim1 About what you said. Your quote is "Russian troops entered Donbass, fabricated an uprising, staged ethnic cleansing and defeated Ukraine because Ukraine did not have an army." This is complete nonsense. First, according to Ukraine itself, the Russian army crossed the border of Ukraine only in September 2014, while the war in Donbas began in April 2014. The war had been going on for half a year by the time the first Russian soldier first appeared on the front line. And it was mostly locals who fought there. Russians made up 50% of the population in Donbas and they wanted independence from Ukraine, and the vast majority of people who fought against Ukraine were Russian civilians, citizens of Ukraine, they were rebels. Russia only helped its Russian people with supplies of weapons, instructors and provisions, as NATO is now helping Ukraine. And the Ukrainian army was not defeated. Ukraine at that time had a huge military advantage over the rebels. Ukraine, of course, had a poorly equipped and untrained army, but ordinary civilians, the rebels, had it even worse, and Ukraine just smashed them for 6 months. Russian army came at the very last moment in September 2014 to save the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, protect their independence and protect the right of the Russian people to self-determination. Russian troops were very few there, because Putin wanted to keep everything a secret from the population of Russia and the whole World, so there were incredibly few troops there - literally one brigade, 3-5 thousand Russian soldiers, but due to technological superiority and training, they were able to defeat the superior Ukrainian forces and establish balance on the front line. However, due to the too small number of troops, Russia could not advance further and the war in Donbass was similar to what is happening now - there were long positional battles like in the First World War. There were 60-70 thousand Ukrainian soldiers against 40-50 thousand rebels and about 10 thousand Russian soldiers and mercenaries.
1
-
1
-
1