Comments by "Sasha S" (@sashas3362) on "The Hated One" channel.

What will we use for passwords when we shift over to using DNA based quantum computers which have integrated with our bodies (perhaps even our own DNA)?
1
@Kardfogu BTW the only reason we don't have flying cars yet is because most people lack the basic intelligence required to build a flying car themselves. They need someone to build it for them. But that apparently isn't likely to happen for some reason, perhaps due to potential liability issues or perhaps due to gov suppression because it would probably lead to loss of recognition/respect of national borders. People would begin to view themselves as world citizens as opposed to national citizens. What confuses me is that there are a lot of people who are capable of building or repairing cars who I would expect to have the ability to build flying cars but they fail to do so for some reason which is a mystery to me because it is easier to build and maintain some types of flying vehicles such as those which use ionized air as the propellant in a hall effect electrohydrodynamic thruster which has NO MOVING PARTS so is much simpler in design and operation than the combustion engines etc found in conventional cars. With the advent of decentralized production via 3D printing, CNC machining, IC board printing, etc it is becoming easier for innovative people to design and get new technology into the hands of the general public because all one needs to do after someone has designed it and uploaded the design files to the internet is download the necessary files and upload them to the 3D printer, CNC tools, etc and wait for the parts to be made. This is creating opportunities for anybody to become a distributor/marketer of parts. That is getting off topic though. The only reason I point this all out is because just as people can make flying cars a reality so too can people make DNA computers a reality because it is very easy and inexpensive to become a "biohacker" these days (or so I have read from sources such as "maker" magazines) and it is getting easier as time progresses, partly due to the aforementioned 3D printing tech etc. All the info and files one needs to build a fully capable biohacking lab is on the internet. Many people are now becoming biohackers experimenting with gene editing tech. We are living in very exciting times where instead of waiting for corporations to deliver we can now make nearly anything a reality ourselves. This is what is called the "4th industrial revolution".
1
@Kardfogu I am professional medical help.
1
@Kardfogu Is that really the best you can come back with? An attack on my mental health instead of challenging me to back up my claims with sources supporting them? Why such childish behavior? Is it because you ARE a child (at least in mind)? Or is it because you know I can (and will) cite tons of (respectable) sources backing my claims if you were to challenge me to do so? Hmmm?
1
@Kardfogu LOL! Conspiracy theories? What are you talking about? No offense but you don't know what you are talking about at all. The fact is DNA isn't used only for data storage but also massively parallel computation. Microsoft has been pioneering their development. I'll share some links proving that later. About ion thrusters, ever heard of "lifters"? There was a trend back in the early 2000's of building small ion thrust devices called lifters which were used to demonstrate the technology. They are very simple to build. All that is required is a neon sign power supply (or the power supply from a "plasma globe" toy or similar toy (a tesla coil)) and some aluminum foil, copper wire, some balsa wood, glue, and solder (and soldering iron) or some connectors to connect the wire to the "lifter". It is funny you say the thrust generated would be too great because critics at the time were saying the thrust was too weak to be useful. But as I said plans for personal aircraft based on this technology are avalaible. It doesn't take a genius to build these vehicles. It only takes somebody with average intelligence to build. Apparently that is lacking in people these days. Or maybe it is simply because people don't know about this technology due to it being squashed by disinformation which convinced most people the thrust wouldn't be sufficient for transporting people or heavy cargo.
1
@Kardfogu Interest in air breathing ion thrusters is starting to be revived again due to some researchers out at MIT who showed that the thrust could be made to be greater than that of conventional methods of propulsion. China and russia have supersonic stealth missiles which use air breathing ion thrusters. The power supply is nuclear powered so it can remain airborne indefinitely (no need to land to refuel). Haven't you heard about that? Nuclear power isn't required to use air breathing ion thrusters for transportation purposes. BTW "lifters" are a type of EM Drive. You may have heard studies ultimately showed the EM Drive doesn't work as originally claimed. But that is not a settled debate according to the original inventor (or rather trademark holder) who has pointed out the designs used in the failed tests were not the same as the original design but "counterfeit" designs developed by aspiring competitors. I should point out the principle of operation of the EM Drive is found in other propellentless propulsion technologies dating back to at least the mid 20th century (approximately the 1950's).
1
@Kardfogu Reprogrammable DNA based computers are now a reality. It is claimed you can store the contents of the entire internet with 1 gram of DNA. The problem was it was too slow to use only DNA for data storage. But microsoft recently increased the read/write speed by 1000x over the previous speed of hours. So the limits of DNA based computers are vanishing. I'd share (external) links here but they get deleted.
1
@Kardfogu You lack basic fact checking skills. Ever heard of "station B"?
1
@Kardfogu Ok I see why you say that. It is not as easy as it should be to find the info on microsoft's exploration of dna computers. It is easily found if you use the right search terms and filters (-storage for example). Here are some page titles to look for: Researchers build nanoscale distributed DNA computing systems ... Programming DNA Circuits DNA-based Molecular Architecture with Spatially Localized ... Researchers build nanoscale computational circuit boards with DNA
1
@Kardfogu An advantage to DNA computers integrated with our bodies would be that this should help protect our rights in the digital realm (presuming these computers are implanted with our knowledge and consent). I mean intruding into and hacking our implanted DNA computers without our consent would be a violation of our bodies. If we retain a right to bodily autonomy/sovereignty then this would be illegal. People are losing bodily autonomy/sovereignty though. The DNA computers and software would need to be fully open source otherwise they would not actually be owned by the users. Verifying the integrity of code in DNA computers (such as when scanning for malware/spyware) is also more reliable than existing traditional computers in which malware can evade detection because it cannot be seen. It is harder if not impossible for malware to evade detection in DNA computers because all the code can be seen.
1
@Kardfogu Another advantage of DNA computers is you don't need to log into your PC. You are always logged in to it. You never log off so no need to log in. Nobody else can use it either or so I would expect (although it may be possible for someone to hack your DNA computer but that may be made imossible through the use of quantum encryption so only your DNA computer can read/write to itself since nobody else has the keys nor does anyone have physical access to your computer). We may still need to log into the equivalent of websites and such but I expect we won't be using passwords to do so. Our identity could be authenticated by our DNA could it not? I suspect other methods will also be used to authenticate the ID of users in networks. Has anybody here mentioned zero knowledge proof as a method of authenticating ID? What do you think of zero knowledge proof (used to authenticate user ID)?
1
@Kardfogu Oh well you and they are doing a phenomenal job of protecting the general public aren't you? I mean a decent (open source) computer or phone is nowhere to be found on the local storeshelves anywhere in the world that I know of. All are closed source. Why is that? It's because none of you have the know how to get a truly secure phone or computer onto store shelves. In light of the fact that all the tech needed to do that is already out there this means you have no excuse. You are complete failures. Face it.
1
@Kardfogu Get a decent computer (a fully open source computer) into the hands of the people of this planet then you can truly begin to claim to be a computer security expert. Until then you can't claim to secure computers because you can't secure a closed source system. You can only pretend to secure closed source systems.
1
@Kardfogu I've shared a few clues on how to get a secure computer into the hands of the people. You have offered nothing of the kind here. All you have done is posed as a computer security expert who supposedly secures insecurable computers. LOL! So who is the poseur here? Not me!
1
@Kardfogu The simple fact is it does no good to be an IT if the internet is made of insecure closed source computers. You need to have secure computers before all else. Otherwise it's a folly and all in vain.
1
@Kardfogu BTW...working in IT doesn't make you an expert on the topic of DNA computers. You didn't even know DNA computers existed until I pointed them out to you. As a matter of fact you even insisted they don't exist...after I pointed them out to you. You still haven't admitted they exist. Probably because you don't want to admit you were wrong.
1
@Kardfogu You are the only one here talking about aliens, pal. Nice try at a strawman attack though. Better luck next time perhaps.
1
@Kardfogu Are you going to keep on sidestepping the issue of zero knowledge proof authentication methods?
1
@Kardfogu Sorry for the harsh words earlier. Don't take it personal. I am stretched to my breaking point by the fact there are no decent computers or smartphones/tablets available when we are being forced to use them due to this pandemic. If they are going to require us to use phones/computers they need to first make sure those actually exist. But they don't exist. What exists are surveillance devices from enemy countries disguised as phones/computers. You see? That is a very frightening reality. It means we are living in a captured nation. How did we get into this situation? We got into it because manufacturing computers was deemed too expensive to do domestically. So we started having most of the manufacturing done in china. Now you can't buy any phones which aren't made at least partially in china. Even apple iphones are made from parts manufactured in china. We are a captured nation and should expect to soon be taken as prisoners of war after which we will die or be used in inhumane science experiments. We need to find a way out of this mess and fast if we are to survive. Bringing the manufacture of computers back here will take too long and it will result in destruction due to the pollution. DNA computers are a viable option though because they are capable of self-replication so don't need to be manufactured (in the traditional way). They are the only viable path imo other than abandoning the use of computers and going back to maintaining civilisation the way we used to back before we had computers. We simply need to use our minds to make them a reality. Most of the hard work of developing all the basic technologies required has already been done. We simply need to put it all to use now.
1
@fredashay Multifactor authentication isn't a viable option when you need to maintain anonymity. Zero knowledge proof methods of authenticatng a user are the only viable option when you need to maintain anonymity.
1
@fredashay I wasn't talking only about making purchases or selling online. One may be an internet activist who simply needs to maintain anonymity (to protect themselves from an oppressive governement) while logging into their various online accounts (email, social media, etc). I was saying zero knowledge proof methods of proving you are the authorized user can be used as an alternative to multifactor authentication. Using your phone or biometrics is not a viable option. Passwords can be broken. So what do you use? Zero knowledge proof perhaps.
1
@fredashay No problem (for the misunderstanding). I'm not really an activist. At least not these days. But we all should be anonymous online because no matter who you are there are groups fighting for control of gov who will imprison and/or execute you. The data mining done by google, apple, social media platforms, websites, and advertisers is dangerous even if it is "anonymous" (stripped of identifying info such as device id) because it is possible to deanomymize the data as recent research has proven. Besides that the fact is google, apple, microsoft, and phone service providers know your location even if you have location tracking disabled. Wifi and bluetooth also reveal location. Video surveillance networks combined with facial recognition tech and the like in addition to other tracking technologies make it nearly impossible if not impossible to prevent a user identity from being attached to a device. Especially for the average person. Even refusing to use phones/computers will not protect you but rather make you a target. Gov will presume you to be an adversary if they cannot prove you are an ally because it is better to be safe than sorry. As the saying goes, "when in doubt throw it out", and that is what they will do. So trying to be anonymous online is futile and only raises suspicions, giving gov a reason for violating your privacy with surveillance under the "reasonable cause" clause, although courts have affirmed anonymity is a basic right essential for exercising other basic rights such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion. The problem is the phones and computers are all built to track and surveil or at least were not built to provide anonymity. Web 3.0 is supposedly being built with the objective of providing and protecting anonymity but I am not sure it can deliver on that promise with the phones and computers we are presently using since those are trackable as explained above. I will invest no faith in web 3.0 until we have quantum computers or at least internet connections protected with quantum encryption. I mean the connection between our devices and the internet need to also be protected with quantum encryption (not just the "backbone" connections). There is a method of making signals disappear except where the transmitter and receiver are located though. It uses principles of holography. It holographically projects the signal to appear at the location of the intended recipient only using the phased antennae arrays found on modern wifi routers. Everywhere else the signal does not appear. It's claimed such a secure connection can be established without knowing the locations of the sender or receiver. Some 5G systems may use this tech although I have only been able to verify the use of beam forming but even that is an improvement. Part of the reason there is so much of an attempt to prevent 5G rollout may be because it can thwart surveillance by gov "stingray" "imsi catchers" and the like (when using at least beam forming). IMO we need to get away from using conventional radio waves to communicate and learn to use quantum entanglement. I hear that is coming in the form of 6G. I'm not sure true 5G has been deployed yet though. Early 5G was actually 4G. True 4G. You see, what they were calling 4G when 4G started rolling out was often not really true 4G. They called it that but is was not. It was LTE. LTE eventually became 4G but was not originally capable of delivering the promises of true 4G. Maybe LTE does now but it definitely did not in it's early forms. So they started using the term 5G to distinguish it from the fake 4G. This was fake 5G though meant to finally deliver all that was promised by the original 4G specs. So now we are waiting for the rollout of true 5G. That may be happening. I have heard so-called 6G is being rolled out in parts of the world but that is probably not true 6G. It is probably what true 5G is supposed to be. Or maybe something completely different. I'll need to do some research to see if an official 6G specification has been established yet. Quantum entanglement uses something different from conventional radio waves. But so too does some 5G. So maybe we should not be surprised to see quantum entanglement used instead of conventional radio waves. I know GPS now uses such entanglement (to improve accuracy). Most people don't know that. It would be great to see a switchover to entanglement instead of using radio waves because of the potential threats posed by radio waves (it's claimed insects are becoming extinct due to electrosmog).
1
@fredashay BTW burner phones are no longer available (at local stores). They look like burner phones but aren't. They are low tech smart phones in an old style flip phone form factor. They all have a spyware OS of some sort (like kai OS) which requires you to agree to be surveilled the first time you turn it on. Kai OS has the facebook app and other social media spyware installed in the browser and they cannot be uninstalled and may not even be disabled iirc. Facebook apps are known to be spyware. But even if old style burner phones were still available you'd have no privacy because all calls/transmissions made or received on prepaid phones over the prepaid voice/data service are recorded for the gov. So they do not offer privacy. A cheap computer (a cheap windows laptop for example) might seem like a viable option but how are you going to preserve anonymity while getting online without sacrificing security? Can't be done. Besides any attempt to maintain anonymity will be futile due to the bluetooth and wifi tracking in addition to facial, voice recognition tech, etc. Resistance is futile. You will be identified. The fact is we have no privacy when using computers. Refusing to use computers won't get you privacy either because that will raise suspicions and make you a target for surveillance. I just want a simple phone but a landline phone is not an option for me because the telephone and cable boxes or pillars around here keep getting opened up which raises suspicions about security. I actually caught some kids opening a phone pillar one night. I don't know if they were just trying to be vandals or if they were trying to hack. They succeeded in knocking out internet service in a neighboring area one day. Anyway, I have been looking into some alternatives but can't find anything viable to establish a simple phone line. It's not impossible to accomplish but would require more money than I am willing to part with at the moment. It should be as easy as buying a phone but isn't.
1