Comments by "Sasha S" (@sashas3362) on "JRE Clips" channel.

I believe the FDA shut down Ambrosia a while back.
6
Some people are born intersexed (hermaphrodites) making them truly non-binary. Others are just rebelling against the unrealistic rules of conformity pushed on us all (pink vs blue, etc).
3
The claim is gender refers only to masculinity or femininity not s3x. A male can rightly identify as feminine if they are feminine and a female can rightly identify as masculine if they're masculine. But a white person cannot rightly identify as black (even if darkly tanned) and a short person cannot rightly identify as tall. Get real.
2
@1953childstar Are you suggesting the guest here was rambling incoherently due to drugs or are you saying the true motivation he started off trying to explain was drugs? After giving it some thought he did say something about how the true motive was some sort of psyop to defuse the "hippies" counterculture by giving the reputation of crazed homicidal drug addicts. Others have said the hippie counterculture was defysed by a psyop which actually destroyed their minds by turning most of them into drug addicts who would not be capable of organizing effectively.
2
Kim K is probably a transwoman.
2
This guy takes a lot of time to explain what the gender paradox is. The explanation takes so much time and is so complex that I didn't catch it.
2
@Jack Smith The David Reimer case is a notable example. Look into it. Then there are the many children who have their anatomical sex surgically reassigned as an infant or even before birth using hormones. Sometimes they do this to make hermaphrodites conform to the norm. But they have also done it to prevent homosexuality. They even do it in so-called hermaphrodites to prevent homosexuality. For example if a boy is born with a p_nis deemed too small, more like an enlarged clit, it's regarded as a result of insufficient masculinisation due to some condition like adrenal hyperplasia (some forms of which can femininze males) which has long been known to also cause homosexuality. So, the doctors will intervene to prevent the feared homosexuality by either performing surgery to make the infant appear to be female, often without the knowledge of the parents, or will intervene by interferring with the hormones during fetal development. I have the published standards of care by a pediatrician society which actually advise to do this without the parents knowledge on the basis that telling the parents the truth tends to increase verbal, mental/psychological, and physical and/or even sexual abuse of such children due to them being perceived as "freaks" or "homosexual" or somehow "defective" by parents and others who find out about this. So, they keep it a secret. This was the standard of care up until around 2015. Since then the practice was supposed to end but the catholic church still condones similar practices (presumably through the many hospitals it owns). Look into what the catholics believe about intersex children. They believe only the doctor has a right to decide what the gender identity of such children is or should be. So, they encourage doctors continuing to perform sex reassignment procedures on babies deemed a high risk of becoming homosexual. I should point out it's debateable whether many "homosexuals" are actually the sex they appear to be. Many might actually be the opposite sex. Many of the people who have had their sex reassigned would habe probably ended up straight but now they appear to be gay and are believed to be gay because nobody knows the truth about how their sex was reassigned. They are casualties in a religious war against homosexuality. Can you imagine the hell these people have endured and are continuing to endure as a result of homophobia? These people have had their lives stolen. Talk about stolen identities...
2
This notion that there are no traits which are exclusively male or female is a product of trying to categorize inters3x people as male or female instead of recognizing them as a third s3x. Because of that people can argue that some "females" have a p_nis or balls and some males have a v_gina or br3asts for example (as in the case of people with XX male syndrome, XY female syndrome, androgen insensitivity syndrome, or adrenal hyperplasia). But if we were to recognize inters3x as a third s3x, instead of trying to fit them into either the male or female category, the differences between the s3xes would become very clear again because nobody could say some so-called males have female traits or vice verse because then all males would have only male traits and all females would have only female traits. If somebody had a mixture of male and female traits they wouldn't be regarded as either male or female but rather intersex. The only problem with this idea is many people don't find out they are inters3x until puberty or adulthood. They grow up believing they are male or female. It would be traumatizing to them to force them to start identifying as something other than what they always believed themselves to be. 2 out 3 of males (67%) develop true gynecomastia so most so-called males would be required to start identifying as inters3x. It's probably to avoid bruising their male egos that doctors decided gender identity determines s3x. Now non-op butch translesbians are regarded as biological females because of this.
2
Perhaps Weinstein is part of a psyop of some sort. Same with that oscar winning movie, "Parasite". Both are trying to convince people that people shouldn't have more money and/or power than others because look what happens: Poor people have to do things they wouldn't otherwise do if they want to get a fair share of the wealth and power. In Weinstein's case we are supposed to believe it's rape because the victims didn't really want to do what they had to do if they wanted to escape poverty. If they said "no" they'd be harming themselves (financially). So they didn't really have the option of saying "no". Therefore it was coercion and rape. You see? In addition, weinstein is being used as prison abolition propaganda. Or do you really believe it's a coincidence weinstein went to prison at the same time covid-19 starts going around and they start trying to convince people we can't put people in prisons because it's like putting them in a cage with wild lions?
1
@germanrud9904 No offense but you need to research that topic more. Look into true hermaphrodites. Its a lot more complex than you seem to know. There are people whose sex truly can't be determined because they have "ovotestis", gonads which contain both ovarian and testicular tissues/cells. Although it's said ovotestis never function as both ovaries and testis simultaneously they can function one day as ovaries and testis the next day. They are "gender fluid" in that regard. Some have a p_nis and nutsack but their nutsack is filled with ovotestis functioning as ovaries. Others are born with a v_gina but they have undescended testis. It's claimed these "girls" are sterile but that may not always be true. Some of these girls may produce sperm and be capable of fathering a child if they have sex with a female (despite not having a p_nis).
1
@germanrud9904 Tell me, what sex is emily in this video? https://youtu.be/stUl_OapUso
1
@germanrud9904 The type of hermaphrodite you refer to would be a female pseudohermaphrodite. Not a true hermaphrodite.
1
@germanrud9904 That's like saying blind people or people in wheelchairs are a minority and arguing that because they are a minority we shouldn't be required to change our society to accomodate them. But the fact is they may not be a minority but rather a majority because up to 60% of "boys" develop "breasts" (gynecomastia). This is so common it is considered normal by most doctors. But it makes these boys intersex by definition. The definition of intersex is having biological traits of both sexes. Mammary glands are normally associated with females so that makes boys who develop mammary glands intersex. "Intersex" is a modern politically correct word used to replace the term "hermaphrodite". I use it here because it applies to anyone who has biological traits of the opposite sex, not just hermaphrodites. We don't know what causes gynecomastia but I believe it is because the "boys" who develop breast tissue are true hermaphrodites with ovotestis in their nutsack instead of true testis.
1
@S10N88 It's at least 50% not 0.05%. See here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/gynecomastia https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/blog/how-does-gynecomastia-affect-boys-and-men-at-different-ages
1
@germanrud9904 I didn't say "manboobs" make you a girl. I said they make you intrsex. Im not talking about excess fat tissue here. I'm talking about development of mammary glands. Big difference.
1
@germanrud9904 Stop typing walls if text? Is this geting too complex for you? Can't keep up? Perhaps you should leave the debate to experts then. BTW, intersex isn't nonsense. It's very real. What's nonsense is the belief that there are only two genders and sexes (male and female or masculine and feminine). The fact is there is (at least) a 3rd sex/gender, which we call "intersex". This includes the hermaphrodites, both true hermaphrodites and pseudohermaphrodites but also includes people who have various genetic cinditions such as klinefelters syndrome which affect their hormonal sex. You see, sex isn't determined by a single trait but rather by weighing multiple traits, specifically, genetic sex, chronosomal sex, hormonal sex, anatomical sex, and gender identity. Gender identity is the most important factor because doctors don't have a right to decide what sex an intersex person (such as emily in the above tedx video should be). You see, doctors are still surgically mutilating beautiful and perfect intersex babies to make their bodues conform with people's unrealistic belief that there should only be 2 sexes, male and female. They do this to give them the best possible chance at a normal life in a society which would otherwise consider them freaks. They also do it because this gives them an excuse to sterilise these children and prevent them from passing along their hermaphrodite genes. But guess what? Despite their best efforts, including encouraging the abortion of foetuses testing positive for the hermaphrodite genes (which they usually only describe to the parents as a genetic "disease" rather than a natural variation) hermaphrodites are still here and may even be a majority. Up to 60% of the population perhaps. Intersex people are a victim of very real eugenics and genocide. This must end. It is illegal. Intersex must be recognized as a natural variation before humans start playing god with gene editing technologies such as CRISPR to erase intersex people from existence by creating designer babies which conform with their delusional belief that there should only be the typical male and female and all else is a deformity and an abomination.
1
@germanrud9904 Says who? On what basis do you make that claim?
1
@germanrud9904 If people weren't so ignorant i wouldn't have to turn this into a long form debate. I should be able to simply point to intersex people and say end of debate. But there is always someone who tries to marginalize them by (ignorantly) arguing they are less than 1% of the population (when they aren't) and that this somehow justifies ignoring and trampling upon their rights.
1
This guy doesn't get it. We still have slavery in the form of prison labor. Involuntary labor =slavery. The claim is the prisons and police departments are owned by white supremacists. The PD has a history of arresting predominantly people of color (usually for the "crime" of possession and/or sale of cannabis) and putting them into prisons where they become slaves. This is part of the reason why you see the uprising against police and an effort to defund and disband police departments.
1
Check out what this doctor says about vitamin D. She says it makes bones brittle and causes other health problems. https://youtu.be/JbrxSCSaSUM
1
So this author starts off early on saying he found holes in the official narrative which revealed manson didn't really believe in the race war ideas he was espousing and then proceeds to explain what the real motive was for the murders at tates house but concludes by saying the motive was to convince people a race war was coming (the same as the official narrative). Did I miss the explanation of what the "real" motivation was?
1
What did she mean when she said there is a relationship between gender identity and sexual orientation?
1
@StunBuns I see your point. Makes sense. But about that claim you made that most transwomen are attracted to men, I've read most transwomen are NOT attracted to men but rather most identify as either lesb1an or asexual. Then you have many who identify as things like pans3xual. Only about 25% of transgenders identify as "straight" (meaning attracted only to men). Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but that is what I've read. But other than that I get what you mean. Makes sense. I found what she said confusing because s3xual orientation is no longer determined by one's biological or anatomical s3x but rather by gender identity of the s3xual partners (although I should point out that biological s3x is alsp beginning to be determined by gender identity).
1
@StunBuns Your questions are valid. I am left wondering the same about those studies.
1
@Jack Smith See here for a horrifying example: https://youtu.be/eQJHPQpf6mI
1
@robbybiddle9236 Got a reference for that claim?
1
@robbybiddle9236 I've heard many of those "suicides" are actually homicides.
1
@cosmosreality222 I don't think it's possible to be unbiased where this topic is concerned. I mean studies can be unbiased but it's simply to be expected that some studies will support transitioning while others won't due to the facts of statistics, for the same reason a coin will land heads up on some tosses and heads down on others, unless the study is designed to eliminate such randomness or bias of the researchers. Aside from that, people have biases where this topic is concerned. They tend to have beliefs which either allow for and support transitioning while others don't. These two groups of people will then latch onto the studies which support their beliefs.
1
@cosmosreality222 The reason I say it's impossible to be unbiased is because people are either raised to believe it's wrong or not. Some of the people raised to believe it's wrong rebel against their indoctrination for various reasons. For example, because they may be LGBT or maybe because they have friends who come out as LGBT. Those who aren't raised to believe it's wrong may be persuaded to believe it's acceptable by the various forces encouraging acceptance. But where do these forces come from? I'm guessing they ultimately come from the LGBT community or supportive friends and family of LGBT people. Many of the scientific studies which shape public opinion on transgenderism are done by people with biases.
1
@robbybiddle9236 Something else to consider is although a community may be tolerant or even supportive of transgenders the fact is this does not mean transwomen are accepted as women or that transmen are accepted as men. Often they are regarded as different. Many mtf's who transition simply aren't satisfied with the results because they do not "pass". Even those who do pass suffer complications from surgery. For example, implant rejection, scar tissue, fistulas (holes developing between the neovagina and rectum), etc. Many mtf's who get bottom surgery find their neovagina closes up the same as an ear piercing will because they fail to "dilate" frequently enough. These complications can drive them to suicide.
1
@robbybiddle9236 Many suffer from impostor syndrome.
1
Public transit needs to open some windows on busses but they REFUSE to do so.
1
So let me get this straight. Joe is bashing kids who adopt upspeak, says he doesn't trust them because they're fake. But then says it's an adaptation to your environment, an attempt to fit in, a way of communicating your "tribe" (techies). Then he admits to adopting a boston accent when he lived in boston as a kid. But then condemns people who adopt an upspeak accent?
1
Check out this article. https://thenextweb.com/neural/2020/06/19/how-quantum-computers-could-make-future-humans-immortal/ This article is basically saying we can use quantum entanglement so that our mind can exist in one or more places simultaneously so that if our body dies our mind survives. This isn't merely making a copy because the duplicate is entangled with the original making it a part of the original. Entanglement allows a particle to exist in two or more places simultaneously. So if we create a simulation of our mind using entanglement to entangle the qubits in a quantum computer with the qubits in our mind then our mind will exist in two places simultaneously. The danger of this technology is that the entangled simulation of our mind could be manipulated or controlled and this would influence our mind. This would be mind control. Hopefully a way to prevent this technology from being abused will be implemented (if it hasn't already). Such dangers aside, the implication of this concept is that we could teleport our minds (if not also our bodies) into a virtual simulated reality so that we could cheat death by continuing our existence inside a virtual world.
1