Comments by "Hardtack \x26 Beans" (@hardtackbeans9790) on "William Spaniel" channel.

While it is true russia is a very large country to cross in an ox cart, on the bright side it will seem much smaller when it starts to break up into smaller countries.
16
I think negotiations would need motivated parties involved. I can see where Russia might be motivated in the near term. I can't see it on the Ukrainian side. They have had two invasions in less than a decade & ceding territory this time will only encourage a third. As it becomes easier for them to batter Russian forces they may ask terms that Russia won't meet. Surrender of war criminals, a 50 km buffer zone beyond the 2013 border, a regime change, and many others. Either Ukraine gets tired (even if it is easier) or the fight spills over onto Russian soil, will it be pressed by both sides.
8
@piotrd.4850 Ukraine is about 20% bigger including 2013 border. Making Iraq only a little smaller. Ukraine is a much better place being close to repair & NATO. Not to mention the countries that are likely to participate.
7
If you were a couple inside russia with an 'iffy' financial future, would you want to procreate? Sex yes, but not to create finacial burdens.
7
Why China isn't helping russia? They may be a rather 'knee jerk', amateurish, country diplomatically, but they aren't stupid. And they are very flexible on the stances they take on many things. Simply put, 'they know which side of the bread their butter is on'.
7
@ernestkhalimov1007 Ernest Khalimov replied: "Zelensky isn't an independent leader since he follows orders from Washington" LOL!! Zelensky is almost issuing orders to Washington. You are misinformed. Too funny.
4
According to asymmetric information I get on YouTube, brainless 'Pootie' has no problem. He has already destroyed all F-16's & ATACMS in a speech just a few months ago. LOL!!
4
@thecoolcarhd4402 I would somewhat agree with you that it would go to far. But I couldn't deny them if they want a buffer zone. Russia nuking Russian soil may not go that well. Even setting off a nuke just inside Ukraine would carry fallout much more into Russia than Ukraine. I don't think Ukraine would pursue it. But it is their choice.
2
@Iambrendanjames It is odd how Ukrainian critics say they are just agents of the US or our proxies. If they only knew that Ukraine is actually leading the way on this one. There are some Russian taking great risk from the outset of the war. Some have been critical for years. About those just blindly parroting what the government say to believe, I would agree with you.
2
@Omega0850 LOL!! Brainless putin would sit on his hands like he has with all the other red lines he declared. NATO calling a no fly zone wouldn't likely be even mentioned in Blyatistan in a few weeks. If you mean russian state TV. The kremlin would forget about it immediately so they didn't have to deal with it. In six month putin would deny he ever said such a thing. Of course putin will be gone within 6 months.
2
@goenzoy Oh yeah, they listened. This threat wasn't just made to numbty-nuts putin. There is so much going around that some magazines are writing expose's about it. It isn't just the Black Sea fleet. The option was left open of the Baltic fleet also. There have been a lot of talking with all levels. Not just the village idiot in the kremlin.
2
@Iambrendanjames Not odd at all. I think the Ukrainians may prosecute your thoughts. If not them then someone else in 10 years. Until Russia learns to live & let live.
1
@BratBugarin Gee!! How well russia agreement in '93 went to keep Ukrain sovereign. Then again in '15 after an invasion led to the brutal '22 invasion. If you use your brain, you see the moron putin has no problem kicking agreements to the curb if it suits his purpose.
1
@nothanks9503Certain types of bioweapons. If they work properly. Which would be very sketchy. Iterations of viruses hoping they become benign could lead instead to great outrage throughout the world if it goes wrong. Thousands (millions?) of massed bodies of Ukrainians might lead to that anyway. It only makes sense if you can control it. And russia can't even control their conventional forces.
1
@BratBugarin Still simping for 'Mini-Me' the kremlin idiot? LOL!! The russian practice of 'repeating a lie enough' only makes putin look like a weak loser at this point.
1
There are reasons that putin could never call for a strategic strike. So many spies & plants in their human launch chain among others. Your premise that tact nukes could be used, is somewhat flawed but closer to the truth. Tinsel brained putin is on a very short leash with some circles of power in the kremlin. Any nuclear battery commander has a second phone number to call if he ever is given such orders. And Major Badinov better damn well call that second number since others under his command have orders to shoot him if not. In either case, strategic or tactical, putin knows he is screwed. He would have a team of FSB wrestling him to the floor in about 2 minutes. Which doesn't mean there aren't some actions he could taken that might be worse. If you ignore the russian side, your video is absolutely correct. Good job.
1
@JohnCSmith-lp1qr 'Misinformation. You ment' Nobody mentioned gay boy putin & his army of trolls. But putin will pin a medal on your chest for saying it anyway. If he can find a step stool to reach that high. 😅
1