Comments by "mel grant" (@melgrant7404) on "Amanda Knox faces new slander trial in Italy" video.

  1. She is the one who accused him .not Italy prosecutor. Innocent people don't accuse Innocent people.
    7
  2. Yes. I never liked the fake concern of hers after doing that.
    3
  3. Pretty guilty.
    3
  4. She accused an innocent man.
    2
  5. She cant shake off that she accused this man.
    2
  6. She was convicted twice.
    2
  7. Nor will merediths family.
    2
  8.  @ambientblue-eyedmonkey8849  agree.i wonder if mytrip is her lawyer.
    2
  9. ​ @missmaggicasares6538 she isn't a victim of crime meredith was.
    2
  10. ​@mytrip6991 well it sadly in this case .she was convicted twice.
    2
  11. @ronald3836  convicted twice. Hardly fantasy.
    2
  12. @ronald3836  good enough for two convictions .
    2
  13. Convicted twice on hunches. OK.
    2
  14. He says knox was there.
    2
  15. ​ @spasiba12345  but being convicted twice leaves doubt .
    1
  16. Merediths family is who I think of.
    1
  17. ​​​ @ourcorrectopinions6824 that's a very stereo typical view. People of all ages can have opinions obviously. Being interested in justice being served does not mean you are bored.
    1
  18. If its from day one then nothing was proved untrue at that stage so it wasn't slander then.
    1
  19. They convicted her twice .that doesn't happen often.
    1
  20.  @ronald3836  so is your opinion. Snap.
    1
  21.  @ronald3836  only to make a snipe at you .
    1
  22. ​ @wowzerdoggy  Amanda seems to put it on that she was also under pressure to name someone but I don't buy it.
    1
  23. ​​ @Helenwheels370  and were you there.no. who accuses an innocent man.she is full of excuses. It was this it was because that.i don't buy it. She wasn't tortured.
    1
  24.  @Helenwheels370  well the police got it wrong about the barman. Just excuses from Amanda.
    1
  25. @mytrip6991  don't think so.just her word against theirs.
    1
  26. ​​ @johncooper7663  she hasn't much choice has she so she is no hero..
    1
  27. ​​ @spasiba12345 they don't seem to want her around though. Don't blame them after her being convicted twice. She would probably never contact them.
    1
  28. ​ @commenter4190 yet when she was convicted she got 26 yrs.
    1
  29. Only slander if it's not true.
    1
  30. Her version though. I don't buy it.
    1
  31.  @Helenwheels370  funny how she was convicted twice.
    1
  32. ​ @EmmaDee trolls.its called opinions.
    1
  33. If she is cleared.
    1
  34.  @Helenwheels370  just said if she is cleared.parrot.
    1
  35.  @Helenwheels370  everyone gets called that by someone who doesn't agree with them.such a cop out.parrot.
    1
  36. ​ @mytrip6991 accusing an innocent man.
    1
  37.  @mytrip6991  no.implicating an innocent man.
    1
  38.  @lour9348  I think he was already looking at two of them.
    1
  39.  @ronald3836  devil looks after his own.
    1
  40. No .just the fact she accused an innocent man.
    1
  41.  @ronald3836  excuses.
    1
  42. ​ @johncooper7663 I thought the dna evidence was comprised.
    1
  43. ​ @rachelross1657  yes for knox to be convicted twice certainly says her guilt imo.
    1
  44. ​ @EmmaDee yes it is right.
    1
  45. They don't trust her never have.
    1
  46. This is all new material for a new book for her.kerchinngg.
    1
  47. @mytrip6991  guilty or not it's not appropriate to profit from a murder.
    1
  48. Reap what you sow.
    1
  49.  @rolacook222  I don't need to remember because I've done nothing. My track record is good thanks.
    1
  50.  @mytrip6991  2009 to 2011 is 2 yrs .
    1
  51. @missmaggicasares6538  but because she was convicted twice leaves doubt in many minds.
    1
  52. @ronald3836  well she is profiting from the case can't be denied .it is inappropriate imo despite her being found not guilty. It's always been about her. Seeing as she has already been cleared why would what I think make a difference to her.dont get why you said about the likes of me affecting her.bit pointless saying that .she didn't even attempt to clear her name in 2014.
    1
  53. Never ends for merediths family.
    1
  54. ​ @missmaggicasares6538 why would he lie about Amanda. He was already going down for it .
    1
  55. She didn't get 26 yrs with no evidence.
    1
  56. For once.
    1
  57. ​ @rogershuttleworth7669 how can see those realistically.
    1
  58. @rogershuttleworth7669  also then there would be no evidence of her being under certain conditions that lead to her implicating an innocent man.
    1
  59. Well they aren't responsible for what she said.
    1
  60. She did stay away once and they convicted her in her absence.
    1
  61. Knox didn't want to go back for her 2nd conviction.
    1
  62. Agree.
    1
  63. She did. She accused an innocent man.
    1
  64. I would think the other way around.
    1
  65. Poor woman. She's happy .
    1
  66. ​ @mytrip6991  sadly.
    1
  67. ​ @ABWeaver you.
    1
  68.  @mytrip6991  she didn't attempt to clear her name in 2014.
    1
  69. Not yet .
    1
  70. Just because it isn't discussed anymore doesn't mean the person is presumed innocent.
    1
  71.  @TheMpo1986  good 👍
    1
  72. @TheMpo1986  looks like it yes.
    1
  73. The bar owner definitely knows what slander is.
    1
  74. How.
    1
  75. ​@ronald3836 he said knox was there.
    1
  76.  @ronald3836  and still she walks free.
    1
  77. Poxy.
    1