Comments by "mel grant" (@melgrant7404) on "Rachel Reeves Challenged on Public Outrage Over Labour Party Donations Row" video.

  1. So shes saying all the money donated wasnt for a gain by the donor. Right. Just because it wasnt tax payers money doesnt make the excessive amounts of money donated appropriate. She seems to think that vast amounts of money spent is justified as long as its declared.
    48
  2. Richard did a great interview here.class. she was totalling busted by him.
    48
  3. Exactly. We are talking vast amounts of money donated here.
    18
  4. Great interview.
    15
  5. Totally agree.
    11
  6. Yes the vast amounts of money donated surely says the donor wants a return on his investment.
    10
  7. It is in this country also.
    9
  8. ​ @kevinsheahan5449 they would never admit it was a bribe when they declared it would they.
    5
  9. Best I've seen.
    5
  10.  @mrcashy5  shocking.
    5
  11. Agree.the vast sums involved suggest buying the labour party for personal gain.
    2
  12. So she see through the lies a bit better. 😊
    2
  13. It's called a bribe.
    2
  14. Agree 👍
    2
  15. Yes the vast amount of money that was given to her was effectively buying the labour party to have them in his pocket. Why else.
    1
  16.  @Oceansgreen  she's just had her hair lightened to soften her harsh face .wonder who paid for that.
    1
  17. Well how come no one knew about it till now.
    1
  18. ​@Fabbydabby1 probably.from lack of affordable heating.
    1
  19. Especially the amount of money involved here.
    1
  20.  @Footplate2012  how do you know he didn't. Was he even on gmb then.
    1
  21. ​ @Fab666. Absolutely.
    1
  22. Bit like the godfather. They expect the favour returned.
    1
  23. Which it clearly is imo.
    1
  24. Especially with the vast amounts of money involved here.
    1
  25. No one knew about it till now.
    1
  26. The vast amounts of money involved suggest effectively buying off the party for personal gain.
    1
  27. Never knew that's why.
    1
  28. Exactly.
    1
  29. He has bought the party.
    1
  30. But surely 68 000 pounds for a photographer is excessive. A paid for apartment in New York was hardly necessary for Rayner.
    1