General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

S3N7RY
Lex Clips
comments

Comments by "S3N7RY" (@S3NTRY) on "Lex Clips" channel.

"Sam Harris: voice of reason" - Lex Fridman: underrated comedian
119
Is Destiny's face falling apart?
36
Waiting in line at 4 in the morning. Truly the mark of rationality, right there.
18
Sam's ability to read Trump's mind is what is most impressive.
15
@shawnbrink7998 proof of what? Crack smoking? Backroom deals? Yeah, it had those.
9
@wilsonsanabia4259 yeah, he just doubles down. Like he did in this clip.
8
@noorkidwai he did that. He denied children weren't affected by covid in the same way as adults in this very clip. Use your delusion, buddy.
7
@terminator2348 it was literally experimental. They needed to declare emergency use. Research into a technology is not implementation of said technology. That's just sophistry.
7
@Shiggystardust what was wrong with Kavanaugh?
7
"we try" not very hard, it seems, if DAN is anything to go by.
7
@robertblackwell8611 won't stop him from dragging Brett though
6
 @BenefitOfTheDoubtInquiry what a bunch of bs
6
And a lot of the data was just outright ignored.
6
"Jesse, what the hell are you talking about"
5
"Music to my ears" is a non-answer? The real question behind the question is "can you recognise when your side goes too far?" RFK: "If I close my eyes, and shut my ears, we can all sing kumbaya"
5
 @joela.4058 bs he thinks that speaking in a calm monotone makes you sound ungodly rational... <cut to his Triggernometry interview>
5
@Rikarth he said children were at risk in this video. There was evidence from the start that that simply has never been true. Scientifically. Where did he get that great nugget, while he was trying to tell everyone to ignore people saying that very thing?
5
 @orange-418lol Ooof SH denies science to this day, and treats opinion as fact. Talking out both sides of his face. What are you on about.
5
@stephensehrbrock5613 he was wrong about the impact of the "virus of unknown origin" on children. In this very clip. After we've had the science on it for 3 years.
5
@tricky2014 he was wrong about a very key piece of information that was available 3 years ago. In this video he says we didn't know how it would impact children. Wrong. We knew from the start, it's just another case of "if it's not presented in the news media, the data doesn't exist". The irony is that Sam just ignored the data that was always there. On government websites. The entire time.
5
@squirlmy very nice. Now let's see that broken down by age demographics, health demographics, and "with" not "from". Let me know if you can see the absurdly obvious. And if body-count is your single metric, you must be all over the rash of excess deaths affecting the majority of nations that took a certain mandatory path. You must be enraged at the deafening silence on those figures.
4
@casualviewing1096 It's funny that you go for appeal to authority on characters that all defer to other professionals in their respective field for their information, and source said information (JRE not withstanding). And you're right, Campbell has been wrong on a number of things: the science behind masks, and the efficacy of v*cines, both of which he has come to realise were undermined entirely by the evidence, since. Good luck with your smear-job.
4
@haonyoass9556 he said we didn't know how it impacted children. It was known from the very beginning. Spoiler: they brushed it off like it was nothing... The entire 3 years and counting
4
@STVNDMC I don't think you can claim clinical equality, but you'd have to be distrustfully obtuse to make a strawman of it, wouldn't you.... Explain my cultishness, I'm all ears.
4
Sam Harris has such a low opinion of anyone that isn't Sam Harris.
3
@jackeagleeye3453 what was he wrong on?
3
@danielbanks332 He said we didn't know the impact on children. This was known in basic statistics (that nobody brought up) from the very beginning. And he still acts like it was an unknown. With 3 years of data. Ignorant or foolish. Take your pick.
3
@@swallowingtherabbitwhole9552 you're pretending that the only way out is "through the fire". Your premise is flawed.
3
"I know everything I need to know about t-dawg, and my cognitive dissonance couldn't handle my preconceived notions being destroyed"
3
@taeeererer already have. Like 5 times. He said we didn't know what risk there was to children. In this very video. Completely wrong. We've had that data from the outset. Now, what was I wrong about, crayon muncher?
3
@DinosaurSuccess examples of his corruption? Or are you like Sam, where you think just saying that is all the evidence you need?
3
This is a treasure-trove of contradictions. It is truly amazing.
3
@blue24563 he was dancing around it the entire time. Don't be a sophist.
3
 @richardfraser7024 From the point of what? The lab? Because you can't be talking like the deaths were in every way avoidable.
2
 @jhonklan3794 Um, he did say that, just not in this interview. Look up his interview with triggernometry. That quote is close to verbatim.
2
@MrVagif1 no, it means your thought process was sound, because you were right - you just think the only path to the correct outcome is guessing when it doesn't align with your outcome. No doubt whatsoever you throw the term "conspiracy theorist" around like candy.
2
"The issue wasn't his policies, it was him as a person" Referring to a president. The voice of reason, everyone. It just goes on and on... It's super entertaining 😂
2
@duewest9801 yeah, and you can deflect to protect your beloved.
2
@trancient he was wrong on the assertions around children. Known since day 1, claims we didn't know, 3 years later.
2
@amazin7006 Your posts are amazing. So confident that nobody can point out where SH is wrong, and then you go super quiet, when they give you a timestamp, say 10:45. You might want to get yourself checked, just sayin'
2
@seanlennon5986 or you're just ignoring where people are citing the video directly. Example: my post directly before yours. Unless of course, it's shadow-banned, but that would just be conspiracy theory.
2
@taeeererer Just look at the CFR data from the beginning of the pandemic, until now. It's all there, ad hom boy
2
"There are limitless indicators of t-dawgs corruption." Not one citation, or example given.
2
@vsTylervs research shows that it would have had a tangible impact on the election.
2
@thetaytheist what linguistic f'ery are you up to. He was wrong, and still is wrong. You wanted an example I gave you one. Now you're being a weasel about it.
2
@STVNDMC it's a qualitative comparison, not a quantitative one. Time to go back to Harris-U.
2
@taeeererer Sam Harris appears to have learnt more from the last few years than you have. I'm not sure what medal that earns you, but I'm certain Galileo would be the first to hand it to you.
2
@Shiggystardust so, your primary occupation to pass a sniff test is whether someone is capitalist? lol
2
@Shiggystardust I mean, sure you can have it. Not my fault your argument was in no way cogent.
2
@Shiggystardust way to double-down on nothing.
2
@taeeererer what was I wrong about?
2
@taeeererer ooof Being intentionally obtuse and calling me a liar
2
@brymstoner I had to go to hospital for Cringe Overload Syndrome. Now I have PTSD. So will I? Will I, really?
2
@magog6852 your comment doesn't even make sense. Nowhere in it, should the word "intellectual" have been used.
2
 @Mick1000 Cry harder. Fact is it did happen. His interview with triggernometry. Conduct the bare minimum of effort. There are clips, if a long conversation is too hard.
2
@gypsycabs he was wrong about 3-year old facts in this very clip and tried to use it as an excuse.
1
@gypsycabs wut
1
@thetaytheist OK moustache man
1
Sam Hubris, amirite
1
Very well said
1
Why, is that your fav. place?
1
Sam Harris: "we didn't know its impact on children" Umm yes we did. We had statistics from day one. You just ignored them out of your own self-righteous fear and pomposity.
1
@albertosillywhips7281 ironically they probably have, because they need to defend themselves from the common unthinking masses that just regurgitate what the TV tells them to think.
1
Sam Harris is the selectively dumbest smart person going.
1
@quamb now show us the demographics of those that died. And explain the "totally rational" fear.
1
@raidan6 to be fair, you haven't even said anything. People are pointing out Sam's hubris and hypocrisy. It's perfectly valid.
1
@quamb you and SH are reaaaal good at reading minds. If we focused on the demographics for personalised care, half of the insane garbage policy that was pushed would not have been needed. And get this, we still would have saved lives. The big lie is that if we didn't do the stupid things we did, more people would have died. John Hopkins research shows otherwise (on lockdowns alone). There were different approaches taken. Now show me where those that focused on liberty did worse than those that didn't. "Run rampant" would be an interesting way to describe a "focused approach" rather than blanket knee-jerk reaction.
1
@buckchile614 oof in with the free-rent TDS
1
@duewest9801 deflection dĭ-flĕk′shən Noun Deviation or a specified amount of deviation. Example: you not addressing OP, but doing a "whataboutism" to deviate away from attacking the point directly. Deflection. oh don't worry, I used it correctly. Your posts are the best. So many empty hubristic assertions. But you're a dolt. Daddy SH would be proud.
1
I like how he explained how anybody can put in the effort, gain the knowledge, and be right in due course. But definitely don't listen to those people on that very subject. Talking out both sides of his mouth. Again.
1
@Rockshit9 comments like yours make me think Sam Harris fans are borderline illiterate.
1
@amazin7006 10:45 "we didn't know the negligible effect on kids" We did know that. The data was there from day one. Shove your hubris up yourself.
1
@amazin7006 10:45 wrong
1
@amazin7006 I gave you an example and you ignored it. You're a liar running around calling everyone else one. Pathetic.
1
Why do Silicon Valley nerds all sound the same? Did this guy steal Jack Conte's voicebox?
1
 @NeaEmrys If he had have spent a moment thinking about the question, rather than dismissing it as a partisan attack, maybe he could have understood it.
1
@davyd28 disregard, I thought your response was in another thread.
1
@andrewknowles5250 he was wrong about data we've had from the beginning *in this very clip*. He still believes bad data that is well known. That's pretty wrong for someone with an ego that big.
1
@haonyoass9556 10:45 completely wrong.
1
it's as if this guy doesn't understand (or is willfully ignorant of) the implication of what is being said by character counts. And then takes a dig at "people" attempting to tease out the implications. "bring back nuance, huh?"... yeah ok buddy.
1
@ethanunderwood1189 I heard his non-answer. It is as I stated.
1
@davyd28 pretty bad clip then, innit
1
Utter mind garbage
1
 @stephensehrbrock5613 lol, Mr Current Events, right here
1
@EvilRican you must be 80, hideously obese, or not touched grass in several years to be that bad-off. Which would put you in the category of people that actually could do with the little help the vax offered.
1
@HarmonicResonanceScale classic leftist. "We demand free shit"
1
@jaywulf what is a magat? Is that some fancy form of ad hom that only re*ards know?
1
"Once in a generation narcissist" *cough*
1
 @Susanrogers-pt9mf6hx1w If you actually listen to his words, pretty clearly he's not.
1
@thetaytheist he specifically said we didn't know what the pandemic would do to children, despite the science being extremely clear from day one. He fell for FUD, and pushed it. And still rationalises it now on flawed logic. I just gave you a prime example.
1
@thetaytheist are you saying that what I am saying is untrue? Since you have an obvious boner for Sam, you won't mind watching 20 minutes of his self-love to find it, will you. What happens if/when I find it again? You make some other excuse? Don't waste my time.
1
@stevez4120 anyone that uses the words "because all these people are capitalist first" should be immediately disregarded for the commies that they are.
1
@STVNDMC to give your dubious question its due, OP is clearly saying that you can be equally rational in your blind adherence to whatever the powers-that-be tell you (ooh boy, wonder whether this describes you), as it is to be equally rational to be sceptical. It depends upon your faith in those institutions.
1
@Shiggystardust yeah, it was a sh1t take, I don't remember mentioning Peterson though.
1
@sammythemc ahh the ol' seatbelt analogy. Never gets old. If you wear your seatbelt in a car that isn't even leaving the driveway, you have mental issues.
1
 @pdcdesign9632 And yet Sam is constantly annoyed by one person's existence.
1
 @timothydouglas7375 Example?
1
@justinbauer175 elitism can easily metastasise into blind faith. See: Sam Harris
1
@blurtling categorically wrong.
1
@thenewyearsgrinch you have no arguments or points, just empty rhetoric. Well done, you played yourself.
1
@thenewyearsgrinch what claim did I make without evidence?
1
@thenewyearsgrinch well, I mean the claim the he lacks self-awereness is kinda self-evident, but if you want examples, I'll try to remember some of the better ones.
1
@thenewyearsgrinch the only thing you've demonstrated is that you don't know the meaning of "self-evident"; that you don't know the meaning of "self-awareness" - you meant hypocrisy; and that you can count to 3. Well done. Sam also said we didn't know how it would affect children. Patently false. This was known extremely early on. 10:45 There's your refutation, if it wasn't already in this thread.
1
@thenewyearsgrinch I have given you a clear cut example (with a timestamp), yet somehow I "haven't demonstrated in the slightest". And you're playing word games, as if you don't understand what "how it would affect children" means, even though you have all the context at your disposal. Go back to reddit, sophist.
1
@quamb oh for sure, but if you go around acting like you are the science, you're going to be given a lot more shit than someone that doesn't pretend to be that.
1
@timothydouglas7375 for example? Sam Harris was wrong about children. We've had that data for 3 years, and he still uses it as a crutch to dpuble-down on - he did it in this very clip. It's pathetic. You've bought the hype. Congrats, sucker. Time for another booster, bro.
1
@amazin7006 10:45 "we didn't know the negligible effect on kids" 100% wrong. We had data from day one. Sanctimonious Muppet. Are you Harris's alt?
1
@amazin7006 argument from authority is claiming someone to be right, merely because of their position, rather than the merit of their argument. SH bois would be all up in that.
1
@taeeererer so nobody should have listened to any of his incorrect statements? I completely agree with you.
1
@taeeererer ...and those experts were wrong. How's the circular logic treating you?
1
*crickets*
1
@taeeererer medical data collection is on a continuum, genius
1
@buckchile614 whataboutism, but I'll play along. Yes, worse. The main thing he was wrong about was used as a tool for controlling an entire population. Garbage attempt. Try again.
1
Not to mention Fauci actively excluded the Director of the CDC from discussion on the matter, to avoid having more than one possibility on origins. "Science"
1
@alicedoors4826 💯 People weren't looking at the data. And the media wasn't doing its job (or was, I guess depending upon perspective) by showing the data. It would have allayed a great deal of fear to know WHO were actually at risk and who weren't. SH still maintains we didn't know the impact on kids. The data has said otherwise for 3 years. But it doesn't get mentioned. So SH basically doesn't know what he is talking about - at a fundamental statistical level - but uses that ignorance to defend his position to this day.
1
Cringe
1
@jasonwhite6463 what corruption? If you think there is more evidence against T-dawg than the the big guy, you are literally delusional.
1
Hey Sam, I know more about "unnamed illness" stats than you do. How do I know I know that? Your words. And my knowledge. Am I an expert?
1
@drunkayylienz3706 this is easily disproven by example. I know that it has changed, but the point was that it can be made biased.
1
@qwcasey he was wrong about the impact to children, which was known early-on and has not changed in 3 years. He either doesn't know what he's talking about, or is being wilfully ignorant to the scientific evidence.
1
Sam Harris has been defending himself through sheer will of ignorance
1
@mattsbees3427 you for sure have TDS. Nobody even mentioned Trump, but he lives rent-free in your head.
1
@duewest9801 and nothing to do with trump either, but t-dawg still lives rent-free in Sam's head.
1
@Zeuts85 outsourcing your Dunning-Kruger. That's a fresh angle. Let us know how that works out for you.
1
@EvilRican you keep spamming the same comments like it means something. So I'll retort with repetition. You are either 80, obese, or get zero sun.
1
@SamtheWarden and what was that?
1
@duewest9801 your analogy is garbage. Imagine your scenario, but everyone explaining how the "bomb" is a just another bag, since professional bomb defusal experts had a good look through it, and security doing a controlled demolition, just so they can't be proven wrong. Cut to you seal-clapping because "it could have been a real threat!!" No, and it never was, security just ignored all the evidence.
1
@amazin7006 10:45 "we didn't know the negligible effect on kids" 100% wrong, from day one. He still thinks that 3 years later. Have you said this in every thread yet?
1
@amazin7006 no, it was terrible. Like acting like the bag hasn't been checked and cleared, when it has. His analogy works against his argument, not for it.
1
@taeeererer no, it is terrible. The bag has already been cleared. By defusal experts. So to act like there is danger, despite evidence, is foolhardy.
1
@Zeuts85 no, you're just rationalising blocking your ears to other evidence under appeal to authority. And then you go onto the mind reading, too. Utter thought-vomit.
1
@Mastikator CFRs
1
@Mastikator you don't know what CFR means, do you...
1
@Mastikator you've already strongly alluded to the fact you're not acting in good faith. Figure it out for yourself. Maybe you'll learn more than one thing today, if you can figure out what it means beyond what a CFR even is. JFC
1
@SamSullyV more than Sam Harris would be a start.
1
@gmorkins6006 you're unaware of the most basic data manipulation of recording deaths "with" covid, not "from" covid?
1
You literally just regurgitated what was already said in the video. You get a D+
1
"I really try to wield the power I have in a thoughtful way". Another victim of the narcissism pandemic. Also the crude words she (i assume) mentioned as not being crude, are crude, by definition. Professional idiocy posing as quirky.
1
Did a hundred teenage girls just descend on this comment section, or what.
1
@SlyFoxFo I think they give out badges for that now.
1
@gregorypaul7898 he was wrong in this very video. Even if you disregard all of his bad takes for the duration of the last 3 years. I'm sure you'll ask, so at 10:45, he says we didn't know. We did. The data was there. He ignored it. Still gets it wrong.
1
Not even correct about the basics. It never affected everyone equally. That was known very early on through fundamental statistics. So all the fear and irrationality born of that lead him to completely flawed conclusions. That HE STILL perpetuates in order to absolve himself. Peak intellectual dishonesty. Or you know... Ignorance.
1
About what exactly?
1
Wow, Lex viewers seem pretty dim, going by the comments
1