Comments by "S3N7RY" (@S3NTRY) on "Sam Harris vs Bret Weinstein on COVID vaccines | Lex Fridman Podcast Clips" video.

  1. Waiting in line at 4 in the morning. Truly the mark of rationality, right there.
    18
  2.  @terminator2348  it was literally experimental. They needed to declare emergency use. Research into a technology is not implementation of said technology. That's just sophistry.
    7
  3. And a lot of the data was just outright ignored.
    6
  4.  @tricky2014  he was wrong about a very key piece of information that was available 3 years ago. In this video he says we didn't know how it would impact children. Wrong. We knew from the start, it's just another case of "if it's not presented in the news media, the data doesn't exist". The irony is that Sam just ignored the data that was always there. On government websites. The entire time.
    5
  5. ​ @danielbanks332 He said we didn't know the impact on children. This was known in basic statistics (that nobody brought up) from the very beginning. And he still acts like it was an unknown. With 3 years of data. Ignorant or foolish. Take your pick.
    3
  6. @@swallowingtherabbitwhole9552 you're pretending that the only way out is "through the fire". Your premise is flawed.
    3
  7. This is a treasure-trove of contradictions. It is truly amazing.
    3
  8.  @blue24563  he was dancing around it the entire time. Don't be a sophist.
    3
  9. Sam Hubris, amirite
    1
  10.  @albertosillywhips7281  ironically they probably have, because they need to defend themselves from the common unthinking masses that just regurgitate what the TV tells them to think.
    1
  11.  @EvilRican  you must be 80, hideously obese, or not touched grass in several years to be that bad-off. Which would put you in the category of people that actually could do with the little help the vax offered.
    1
  12. Not to mention Fauci actively excluded the Director of the CDC from discussion on the matter, to avoid having more than one possibility on origins. "Science"
    1
  13. ​ @alicedoors4826 💯 People weren't looking at the data. And the media wasn't doing its job (or was, I guess depending upon perspective) by showing the data. It would have allayed a great deal of fear to know WHO were actually at risk and who weren't. SH still maintains we didn't know the impact on kids. The data has said otherwise for 3 years. But it doesn't get mentioned. So SH basically doesn't know what he is talking about - at a fundamental statistical level - but uses that ignorance to defend his position to this day.
    1
  14.  @EvilRican  you keep spamming the same comments like it means something. So I'll retort with repetition. You are either 80, obese, or get zero sun.
    1
  15.  @SamtheWarden  and what was that?
    1
  16.  @SamSullyV  more than Sam Harris would be a start.
    1
  17.  @gmorkins6006  you're unaware of the most basic data manipulation of recording deaths "with" covid, not "from" covid?
    1
  18.  @gregorypaul7898  he was wrong in this very video. Even if you disregard all of his bad takes for the duration of the last 3 years. I'm sure you'll ask, so at 10:45, he says we didn't know. We did. The data was there. He ignored it. Still gets it wrong.
    1
  19. Not even correct about the basics. It never affected everyone equally. That was known very early on through fundamental statistics. So all the fear and irrationality born of that lead him to completely flawed conclusions. That HE STILL perpetuates in order to absolve himself. Peak intellectual dishonesty. Or you know... Ignorance.
    1