Comments by "worn down" (@worndown8280) on "The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters" channel.

  1. 118
  2. 66
  3. 51
  4. 25
  5. 24
  6. 17
  7. 16
  8. 16
  9.  @BaldorfBreakdowns  The stats people are citing you are from a study that found and massive disparity of the number of males vs the number of females who are having sex in younger demographic cohorts. And it is massive. Womens numbers are steadily rising while mens have crashed more than 50 percent. That basicly women are having more sex, with fewer men. Now I dont think its as extreme as most say it is, "10 percent of men sleeping with 80 percent of women", but I think some may be conflating the studies and also surveys taken by women on dating websites that show that women find 80 percent of men non dateable. If they wont even date them will they even consider them for a sex partner, probably not no? Multiple studies show this including one by Dr. Peter Ueda, a postdoctoral researcher at the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden, the U.S. General Social Survey up until 2018. Meanwhile sex at middle age has utterly collapse. Single men and women, which there are more than ever due to divorce, are no longer mingling. And these stats are all up to 2018, so cant blame the coof. If you would like more studies, I would be more than happy to tell you them. I totally understand why so many people would be uncomfortable with this data and the evidence it shows. Its damaging to both sides, for different reasons and will effect both men and women in completely different ways. I mean most people dont even see the demographic collapse thats about to happen. People dont understand whats coming.
    16
  10. 15
  11. 12
  12. 11
  13. 10
  14. 8
  15. 8
  16. 8
  17. 7
  18. 7
  19. 7
  20. 7
  21. 6
  22. 6
  23. 6
  24. 6
  25. 6
  26. 6
  27. 5
  28. 5
  29. 5
  30. 5
  31. 5
  32. 5
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 4
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. @S. Well for one regulation. I am not sure but coding laws in the US are insane. That creates a supply bottleneck, which creates cost increases. Add city planning to the mix, were certain land is approved for certain types of buildings, leads to a bottleneck, which creates price increase. Take the price of wood. And I am not trying to turn this political, but the Biden Admin levied a doubling of the import tariff on importing of Canadian lumber into the US, this raised the price of lumber. Canada being pissed by this, decreased its output of lumber reducing total board feet. So increased tariffs and lower supply, thats right lumber prices quadrupled per board foot. This raised the price of construction of the average US home by 40k. Would you want to live in a 1960s home? Worse wiring, no dishwasher, no washer and dryer maybe, so technologically have to spend more to bring it up to what is acceptable now. Increases the cost of a home. But there is a bright end of the tunnel. And I know you live in Britain, but I am not at all familiar with your housing markets but I am familiar with your demographics map. So in the US, right now we have 2.8 people for every domicile. After the boomers pass, that will drop down to 2.2 to 2.3. Thats massive. Many places in Europe will see larger drops. You will have massive amounts of empty housing. Which will cause what up until the probably 1960s, when the boomers showed up, for residential housing to return to what it almost always was, a depreciation asset. Meaning its will become cheaper the older it gets, like a car. So if you do have kids, know your child or children will have it easier in that regard. You are already seeing this in Korea and Japan. The demand curve is changing. And if Britain and other western nations stop bringing in foreigners it will collapse markets. And that usually causes governmental change. Also your mortgage laws dont help. The fact that you cant get a pre negotiated rate for an entire term of the mortgage shocked me. I still dont understand how you can sign a mortgage and have it periodically update by the bank. That sounds absolutely predatory and seems designed to keep people renting. So I get that the US and British housing markets are totally comparable.
    4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. 4
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 3
  58. 3
  59. 3
  60. 3
  61. 3
  62. 3
  63. 3
  64. @S. Its a matter of choice not fault. It doesnt have to be a pejorative. But every choice has a consequence. If a woman wants a man her own age, she will be hard pressed to find one who has made his way in the world. Not only do young men have to compete with other men, they now are forced to compete with women as well. So she may look to one in his 30s or early 40s, will most women your age do that? No, its to stigmatizing. Well thats a choice. These are all unintended consequences to choices. But they are still consequences. When women want kids enough, they will stay home and take care of their own and maybe take care of their neighbors as well. Earn a little coin doing it too. But that would require a change in lifestyle no? Again, its not blame, its not good or bad, its just choices. And every choice, has a consequence. How you view that consequence is up to individual interpretation. And you dont need as much money as you think. But you want that much because you like those things. When you want kids more than you want those things, you might compromise on it. Until then, again, its a choice that has a consequence. I lived in California until last year. Arguably more expensive than Britain. I got married, had 3 sons, and bought 4 different houses. I did it on an income that maxed out at $65k, thats roughly 48.5k pounds. I just want to say I dont blame young people, most are utterly ignorant of basic economic principles because they have never been taught them. If they did they would burn down their respective governments. And lets be honest, most women have been so utterly brainwashed that most dont even think of getting married until maybe 28 and having a kid or maybe two once they are in their early 30s. I dont mean to sound insulting but its stunning how talking to younger women they all parrot the same thing. Yes I am also aware of how utterly stupid a man in his 20s is. I was one several decades ago. But men have the luxury of something women do not, time.
    3
  65. 3
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. @S. You are joking arent you? Family planning was always a thing. People typically didnt have more kids in the US than they could care for. There is this view that men didnt care what happen to their wives. That they were just baby machines to their husbands. As a man I find this laughable. In the US in 1800 the average family had 7 children, half statistically would die. By 1900 the average family had 3.5. What changed? In both cases family size was stable. Ill admit I dont know late 19th and early 20th century British domestic history, but was it really so different there? You are right on the economics though. But and I want to say I cant cover everything in a post because who will read it, A lot of the expense is coming from political policies used to buy votes. A policy, like lets say rent vouchers for the poor, sound like a good thing. But then there is more money and more competition for rental spaces and so guess what happens to prices, they go up. Same when people do it for food. the same with health care. And soon people see it as a right and anyone who comes and says hey I know these policies seem good, but they are causing all these unintended consequences. And they are very quickly called every name in the book and they learn quickly that no one will listen to them. I mean you have done it to me several times. You even think I dont care, when in fact I do. Most of the economic issues of today exist because of the added economic value the last 4 generations have had. If you want to fix it you need to remove those programs. But people dont want to because its their turn to get the free stuff. Its like the doctor who wants to treat a patient but has to cause them a pain. Bitter medicine that the patient does not want to swallow. In the end thats a choice. But when a leg turns black or you get sepsis and die, thats not the doctors fault. its the fault of the patient who refused treatment. Who is blaming 20 year old women for a 100% of what? I am not even following you on that. Can you explain that a bit more please?
    2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1