Comments by "Mike Corleone" (@ogslowdragon) on "Gad Saad" channel.

  1. It's disgusting that these hacks can use this redefining of what happened to prosecute this guy. It wasn't unethical too catch these fake intellectuals allowing dribble to be peer reviewed.
    2
  2. If their data is false it's due to the fact that the peer review board approved garbage. Their participation through their every day work cannot be considered anything extraneous. If anything it world be a static collection of data. They didn't have to approve garbage. If they feel bad that they did, they should.
    1