Comments by "Mike Corleone" (@ogslowdragon) on "Proof of evolution that you can find on your body" video.

  1. So losing something is evolution. I thought things got more complex not simpler. I guess you lose everything until you end up with humans. I wonder how we started out if we've lost stuff until we were left with the bodies we have today. ..lol. i know, maybe evolution is just a fairy tale for grown ups that they've been indoctrinated into since kindergarten. Omg...vestigial tale with no bone or musculature...yeah. ..That's a skin flap not a tail. Not even centered on the spine. Sorry, that's just more bunk to debunk. Evolution does not happen, nor do you have one single example of evolution. Only variations within the original animal kinds. So yeah, you'll get big dogs, small dogs, hairy dogs, bald dogs, short dogs,and tall dogs. ..But you'll always get a dog every time. Same for every other kind of animal. Variations within the kind and limited to that kind unable to mutate far from the original without serious genetic issues. MutatIons are generally bad but you think that's how we got every kind of animal? Is there anything worse than bad observations based on Previous misconceptions. And vestigial structures are the opposite of evolution. You're losing stuff not gaining stuff. Like i said, are you gonna lose everything and that's how we got here?
    1
  2. Lol. .. assumption, assumption, assumption. Losing stuff is not evolution. It's de-evolution caused by the refining of genes over years of "selective" breeding. Sad sad sad. Desperation for an antiquated hoax living on in the minds of people who believe they are programmed to think this way. I feel for you. Question... where did these evolved vestigials come from in the first place?
    1
  3. Aiden Nelson and its all imagination smart ass. You don't know they came from anything changing into something else. Smoke and mirrors don't make good science. And one experiment is worth a pound of theory any day. Any changes in the morphology of organisms are limited to within certain constraints that are never violated without detrimental effects to the organism. And do you really think wet can keep losing things and that's how we got all the animals we see today. Where did the originals come from to lose all this stuff. Again, just a desperate attempt to salvage a ridiculous theory that requires abiogenesis to even get started. If that isn't a good kick in the pants,I don't know what is. A false theory based on a proven falsehood. For shame...
    1