Comments by "Christopher Conard" (@christopherconard2831) on "" video.

  1. The US Supreme Court can do the same. They have a long history of "incentive interpretation" of previous laws. Most Americans are surprised that there is no right to privacy in the constitution. The justices cherry picked a few phrases from other amendments, stuck them together, and created it. But, since they did, we now (sort of) have one.
    3
  2. You only need to be Mirandized if they are going to question you beyond stuff like your name, or possibly reason for being where you are. For example, they can ask for a name and proof of it during a traffic stop, and you are required to give it. (Sorry Sovcit people, that's the law.) But they require a reason to do something like search your car. Though, thanks the the nearly abolished Fourth Amendment, those reasons are now paper thin.
    2