Comments by "Jim Mcneal" (@jimmcneal5292) on "Can you outsmart the fallacy that divided a nation? - Elizabeth Cox" video.

  1. But they aren't. There was medieval warm period and little ice age in 16-18 centuries. So even if greenhouse gas emissions play the major role, they are not the only factor
    2
  2. ​ @an_oracle ok and?
    1
  3. ​ @an_oracle  "people" 🤣🤣🤣
    1
  4. Examples?
    1
  5. ​@Timeskipper-g2n why should other people's needs and wants matter more or equal to mine? Plus are you gonna do it? Often people preaching about "putting yourself in other people's shoes" don't do it themselves(like for example in case of sI*very). And finally, what if both sides don't want to compromise, despite being able to imagine themselves in a position of their opponents?
    1
  6. ​ @carolinemendell1963  cringy argument. Sleeping person also doesn't have consciousness
    1
  7. @ unless you win
    1
  8. @ you did not present any argument, thus your comment is void of any meaning
    1
  9. ​ @carolinemendell1963  ok and?
    1
  10. ​ @beenviolent  it will appear again in some form. Forced labor in jails already exists
    1
  11. Create laws that don't go against the constitution
    1
  12. ​ @carolinemendell1963  abolitionism is not objectively right
    1
  13. Yes, meat consumpsion should be protected by the constitution
    1
  14. ​​ @cutecats532  why should we care about state of the workers?
    1
  15. @ workers are not good soldiers. The only reason they have won any rights is simply because elites back in 19th century were EXTREMELY humane and compassionate. That's also why basically all rebellions of slaves did not really work in the past, and totalitarian regimes are possible
    1
  16. @ communism leans towards big government obviously, simply because it literally owns and therefore has to manage all the property in the country
    1
  17. Well, yes, but only even back in 19th century people in the west were too woke
    1
  18. ​ @chrislayden1594  it seems you have problems with comprehension. There were MANY people who believed it was right
    1
  19. ​@TheDragonWalrus why should it be prohibited? I have rational arguments for it and against, but you probably only have emotional arguments
    1
  20. ​ @Supernova012  not necessarily. Sometimes it can include only citizens or only people of certain ethnic groups
    1
  21. Wtf is this cringe? Plus morals are relative anyway
    1
  22.  @gremlinbox5655  No, it is not a moral thesis. It's a metamoral thesis. Google what metaethics is
    1