Comments by "Hyok Kim" (@hyokkim7726) on "How Israeli 3-Phase Invasion Plan Unfolds" video.

@zero11010 ''I mean, you can ask that question of ANY nation.'' How many nations bombed U.S.N. and allowed to get away with it? ''The US can be trusted? Do you trust the government of Brazil? Do you trust the government of France? Do you trust the government of Greece? Do you trust the government of Australia? See how all of those questions are meaningless?'' How many of them bombed U.S.N. warship in peace time? ''But, that’s VERY different from what Hamas has done in since the invasion began, right?'' Was it as bad as U.S.S. Liberty? ''Intentionally targeting a music festival and intentionally killing 300 unarmed civilians. Intentionally grenading a bomb shelter full of unarmed civilians. Intentionally dropping a bomb on a clearly marked ambulance and then releasing the footage from that drone to show others you’re breaking Geneva conventions. The plans have been found. They VERY intentionally targeted civilians and their goal was to take as much life as possible.'' Hadn't U.S. done the same during WW2 on strategic bombing? ''Their militia hides among the population. So much so that when Israel told Palestinian civilians to clear out of a space Hamas told those civilians to stay put … guaranteeing the death of Palestinian civilians when Israel came for Hamas.'' Vietcong did the same; U.S. still recognizes Ho's flunkies as the legitimate government. ''How about the explosion outside the Palestinian hospital and how Hamas said that was Israel. And then video footage came out CLEARLY showing that it was a rocket from a barrage sent by Hamas that hit their own hospital and they lied about it coming from Israel.'' That is in dispute by other sources; you're relying on WSJ, a notorious NeoCon flunkie shill/front. You can google, A Close Look at Some Key Evidence in the Gaza Hospital Blast ''I could provide more examples … it feels pointless to continue.'' Didn't Israel lie about U.S.S. Liberty, and/or keep changing its stories? ''Both sides are not equally at fault here.'' Why do you think so? Hadn't the Zionist committed terrorism against the Palestinians before the state of Israel? jabaliya refugee camp bombing, was it ok? ''Hamas is being exterminated because they asked for it.'' Are you saying, just because a nation commits terrorism, it deserves to be exterminated? Hadn't U.S. committed terrorism, and/or sponsored terrorist movement?
3
@zero11010 '' Hamas has shown they cannot be trusted. But, that doesn’t make hearing Israel’s side balanced.'' Israel can? U.S.S. Liberty
2
Till IDF no longer enjoys cost effectivve military supremacy.
1
@chrisburns143 ''I don’t support any killing of women/children/elderly, ....'' Why not? ''..but it was the people of Gaza that voted for Hamas. We should be asking why nobody in the Muslim world wants to take the people of Gaza ??'' How many in U.S. do you think would pay the bill and house the family, if one of their relatives got robbed and beaten?
1
@minwhalee6630 ''many Muslim leaders are bowing down to Zionism and America right now'' No, they're just biding their time. ''...except Erdogen from Turkey.'' The Rug Merchant is a wannabe Sultan; MBS is not going to let him. ''Also, the Palestinians had no choice but Hamas. The oppressed group needs some type of resistance by any means if they want to overcome the occupation and that resistance happens to be Hamas/terrorists.'' Gazans, Ditto.
1
@RussellWarshay Why do you think they should have, when the Zionist chose not to?
1
@minwhalee6630 It's not just ME; Ghandi/MLK/Mandela got lucky, thanks to the Cold War.
1
@RussellWarshay So why hadn't the Zionist tried as well?
1
@RussellWarshay What's the difference?
1
@RussellWarshay So why doesn't Israel follow your advice?
1
@enndubful ''It's a cop out to say that the responsibility is on Israel not to displace Palestinians rather than the Muslim countries to take then in.'' So per your logic, the West should have taken the Jewish refugees fleeing the Nazis after the Kristallnacht, so why hadn't they? ''Israel is waging a war against Hamas.'' No, the Zionist is waging war against any anti-Zionist, not just Hamas. ''That is a fact, and the question now is what are Muslim countries going to do to help limit civilian casualties.'' So why hadn't the West taken in the Jewish refugees? ''For example, Ukrainian refugees are currently being housed all over Europe.'' So why hadn't the West taken in the Jewish refugees? ''That doesn't mean that the countries that took them in are legitimizing Putin's attempts to annex the Ukraine. It just means that they are trying to help limit the humanitarian costs of the war, like any moral country should.'' So why hadn't the West taken in the Jewish refugees? Perhaps, because they were not moral countries? ''Muslim countries are refusing to take Palestinian refugees specifically because they want to use those refugees as pawns in the war for international support. They think it is preferable to have dead Palestinian refugees rather than alive Palestinian refugees and no propaganda to use against Israel.'' Yes, anything wrong with that. Hadn't the Zionist collude with the anti-Semites within U.S. to block the Jewish refugees coming to U.S. in order to encourage them to go to Palestine instead, or suffer the persecution under the Nazis so that they could use it for propaganda? ''Moderate governments also don't want Palestinian refugees because they tend to support terrorists trying to overthrow the local government and replace it with a government that is more antagonistic towards Israel.'' So are you implying they should go to outside Muslim countries instead?
1
@enndubful ''Israel goes out of its way to limit civilian casualties in stark contrast with Hamas, ....'' Isn't that due to bad PR rather than humanitarian concern? ''so there's no reason to think that Israel would block Palestinian refugees from evacuating to another country as long as the crossing can be secured to prevent supplies from being snuggled in the opposite direction.'' So you do admit Israel wants the Palestinians gone from Gaza?
1
@enndubful '' They literally call up the residents of buildings used by Hamas and tell them to evacuate, despite the fact that this gives Hamas time to escape with their rockets. Israel is under no obligation to drop flyers, knock bombs, or send text messages to residents when Hamas is using the building to store weapons or house militants, so the only reason that they would put themselves at a systematic disadvantage is because they actually care about civilian life.'' IDF is not under any systematic disadvantage when they have the military supremacy, and their concern for limiting the collateral damage is bad PR, not humanitarian concern.
1
@ajcso7844 '' It is not Israels responsibility to take in Palestinian refugees either because most of the refugees left on their own accord from Israel......'' The Germans could use your logic for the Jewish Refugees who had left Germany on 'their own accord'. So the West refusing to take in the Jewish refugees was ok? ''..and were driven out from wars where Israel was on the defensive.'' minorities ''Even then Israel allowed the funding of the Palestinian government even after they refused the 1948 deal.'' Why did Israel fund them then? ''The Palestinians who stayed were given free citizenship.'' Why were they? ''The Palestinians you see now are people that the surrounded Middle Eastern countries rejected.'' Didn't the West reject the Jewish refugees fleeing the Nazis? ''Also Gaza shares a land border with Egypt which is one of the so called Muslim countries you mentioned who was also a big player in the wars against Israel and the West Bank shares a land border with Jordan so your claims that they are completely blocked all because of Israel is false.'' Is Egypt at war with Israel now? ''Even so Israel have been given exist visas to the people of Gaza even though its a hostile nation.'' So why does she? ''Also Gaza is at war with Israel and a hostile nation so if they want free passage through Israel they need to stop being a hostile government.'' Why do you think Gaza is hostile?
1
@ajcso7844 ''No Egypt used the argument the border is shut due to bombings as a cop out. Bombing should not effect is the border is closed or not and Israel is not bombing all the border.'' One doesn't need to bomb all border areas, just the bottlenecks aka chokepoint. ''Egypt is also bulldozing Hamas tunnels and they built a border wall.'' Anything wrong with that? ''Also as we can see many times a lot of aid given to Gaza has been used for war.'' Israel has done the same from U.S. aid; anything wrong with that? ''The terror tunnels uses resources met for buildings and gas has been stolen to power those tunnels and water pipes have been dug up for missiles.'' U.S. Aid to Israel could be used to help the Americans here at home. Why should Israel get the money that could be used to help the Americans at home?
1
@ajcso7844 ''Jordan has a border with the West bank and they have blocked Palestinians from going to their country from their.'' From their? ''Also the Ukraine war is not a religious war like Israel vs Hamas.'' No, and neither is the war between Israel and Hamas, but a pseudo-religious war.
1
@ajcso7844 '' It is they have used cellphone warnings and they have dropped leaflets to move South since Hamas has less of a presence there and they have not hit certain Hamas targets due to there being a lot of civilians in the area. They have also used guided bombs. Despite what you claim Israel has done a pretty good job compared to other countries since Gaza is one of the most densely populated places in the world.'' Wasn't that due to bad PR rather than other concerns?
1
@anonisnoone6125 So much for the equality, and feminism!
1
@ajcso7844 ''Yes Jordan does not except Palestinian refugees from the West bank.'' Anything wrong with that? ''Also yes the Israeli vs Hamas war is pretty religious. If Israel was a Muslim nation no one would be complaining.'' What kind of nation is Israel then?
1
@ajcso7844 ''Does it matter if its for PR or not? At least Israel is putting far more effort then what most countries would do.'' “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full.'' - Matthew 6:5
1
@ajcso7844 ''I'm confused are we in a disagreement or not?'' I am looking for the truth based on evidence/facts; all relevant facts, not just convenient to one side. ''Also yes it is true Israel is a Jewish state due to the fact Jews around the world can be Israeli citizens if they want.'' ...but is it based on Torah? Does today's Israel qualify as Jewish state according to Torah? ''But at the same time its a democracy that has freedom of religion.'' So did South Africa, during Apartheid; and so did the West during the colonial era, and U.S. during the antebellum South, and Jim Crow era.
1
@ajcso7844 ''Well at the end of the day most countries only follow international law for good press or because not following it is not militarily smart.'' Are you implying that a nation does not have to follow international law if the nation can get good press without following it or because not following it would be militarily smart? ''For example if a country kills all POW.s then the enemy won't surrender.'' So you think it would be ok to kill all POWs if the enemy is still willing to surrender? ''So whats your point? I can't name a country who has gone to war who has been nice out of the goodness of their heart.'' Don't Americans always go to war to save the world from evil doers out of the goodness of their heart?
1
@ajcso7844 ''But at the same time its a democracy that has freedom of religion.'' - ajcsco7844 ''So did South Africa, during Apartheid; and so did the West during the colonial era, and U.S. during the antebellum South, and Jim Crow era.'' - Hyok Kim ''Hmmm true but beside the fact that Jews around the world can instantly get free citizenship in Israel Muslims have equal rights to Israeli citizens unlike the US and South Africa during Apartheid and Jim Crow.'' You forgot about the West during the Colonial era; are you implying that the Western Colonialism was okay since it was a democracy, and a had a freedom of religion? Jews anywhere can become Israeli citizens; others cannot. Is it okay to discriminate based on religion and race for immigration? 'Also yes it is true Israel is a Jewish state due to the fact Jews around the world can be Israeli citizens if they want.'' - ajcsco7844 ''...but is it based on Torah? Does today's Israel qualify as Jewish state according to Torah?'' - Hyok Kim The 613 Commandments (Mitzvot) If not, then wouldn't today's Israel amount to a blasphemy? ''Also it is good to find the truth but at the end of the the day the truth is weird for this conflict.'' Not really. Israel will exist so long as she's strong enough, and/or accepted as a legit ME nation by the Arabs.
1
Do you know why you got censored? Are you allowed to tell us? I don't believe in censorship, not as much out of 'principle', but purely pragmatic reasons. If anyone is telling the misinformation, either wittingly or unwittingly, eventually it will show later on. You cannot necessarily trust the hot doggy pilots to tell the truth, on operational/strategic point of view or the veteran tank commanders ala 'The Chieftain'. Sometimes, they don't get the big picture. Some of the panzer aces in WW2 are brilliant in tactical pictures, but utterly foolhardy at the operational/strategic/logistics level. If anyone is being intellectually lazy, and philosophically careless about comments, then it will show in its inconsistency in reasoning later on eventually. On war crimes, it's a moot point; both ROK and U.S. had committed war crimes, and no one cares. On U.S. attaching conditions to aid to Israel; U.S. had insisted on ROKA to commit war crimes during Jeju uprising. You can use MBTs in urban warfare, but it doesn't mean it's cost effective, unless one is confronted with the enemy using MBTs to defend within the city itself. Hamas has few if any MBTs to speak of. One doesn't need MBT's direct fire range to clear the light infantry in urban warfare. All one needs is breech loading mortar on armored car, for the close range direct fire, and plunging fire for extended range, or suppressive fire on the other side of the building/street. Even if the enemy had MBTs to defend the city unless the enemy's MBT's firepower and armor is far inferior to the friendly MBTs, one doesn't gain much advantage by deploying MBTs, especially in nowadays of man portable AT missiles. MBTs going into the city against MBTs waiting in the alley for the pre-zeroed KZs with mine fields, and mortars to land on the top of the friendly MBTs: who do you think would have the advantage? Mortar shells landing on the top of the turret/hull, where the armor is the thinnest on pre-zeroed KZs. Italians had used this technique to devastating effect in N.A. No amount of fancy APS/Reactive armor would work. I consider APS/Reactive armor to be band aid solution in an age, where the enemy SPGs can launch accurate, devastating bombardment on the top of MBTs at a range, MBTs have no chance to match. MBTs are meant to be used in big, dense formation for an operational breakthrough on enemy lines in the field; they are not meant to be used in dense city fighting. It is a waste of resource. Optimizing MBTs for use against light infantry is a penny wise, dollar foolish solution. On the killing of the teenagers, I suspect it was a group other than Hamas, could have been a rogue, or some flunkie doing another's bidding to sabotage cease fire/peace between Israel and Hamas. As for UN, it has no credibility. They have ignored war crimes committed by superpowers and their allies. ROK for one, has no intention of following UN mandate if it comes to a war with PRC/DPRK. U.S. had refused to sell bunker buster bombs/missiles when she got ahold of ROK plan, in a potential war with DPRK or even PRC. Why ROK had to develop its own bunker buster bombs/missiles. Mowing the lawn was never a viable policy; it's nothing more than a band aid. There are only two solutions; IDF maintaining military supremacy forever, and U.S. remaining #1 Superpower forever and supporting Israel forever. Or Israel finding a way to be accepted as a legitimate ME nation by enough of the Arabs, through diplomacy, and structural change of 'Jewish Majority State'.
1
@Osamabintardin Why do you think U.S. should support Israel?
1
@deserthorsedude ''The region needs a peace leader, like Gandhi was for India.'' Ghandi got lucky thanks to the Cold War. Without the Soviet menace, UK would have never granted independence to India.
1
He has improved since the days of F-35 video.
1