General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Mike W
Forbes Breaking News
comments

Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW165) on "Grothman Plays Video Of Biden Bragging About Getting Ukrainian Prosecutor Fired In Oversight Cmte" video.

@thedin3467 Most americans do yes
8
@ComicHorder410 "It was a general assumption … among the European Union, France, Germany, American diplomats, U.K., that Shokin was not doing his job as a prosecutor general. He was not pursuing corruption cases," Volker Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
5
@ComicHorder410 "The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it" deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine Vitaliy Kasko
4
@cathylandry4021 you're clearly confused
4
They cant and they know it
3
"When Vice President Biden made those representations … he was representing U.S. policy at the time," Volker, Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
3
"It was a general assumption … among the European Union, France, Germany, American diplomats, U.K., that Shokin was not doing his job as a prosecutor general. He was not pursuing corruption cases," Volker Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
3
"Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2014 and 2015" Kasko
3
@ComicHorder410 "When Vice President Biden made those representations … he was representing U.S. policy at the time," Volker, Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
3
@ComicHorder410 "Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2014 and 2015" Kasko
3
@RowOfMushyTiT We would if they had the kinda leverage on us as we had on them
3
@RowOfMushyTiT Lets not forget the European Union, France, Germany, UK and Ukraines own people all wanted the prosecutor gone
3
@jeremypassmore7019 Trump was committing a crime
3
Not even close to a crime
2
"The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it" deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine Vitaliy Kasko
2
@ComicHorder410 Not even close
2
@ComicHorder410 There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015"
2
@ComicHorder410 There are no emails or depositions that say im wrong
2
@ComicHorder410 "this is the completely crazy person[Shokin]" "there is no one single word of truth" -Petro Poroshenko
2
@thedin3467 Nobody "picked" anybody. You're confused
2
@thedin3467 Countries pressure other country's to do or not do certain things all the time. Please educate yourself
2
@robertjohnson1681 You're literally making stuff up lol
2
@Ashphinchtersayswhat This is why we call you a cult
2
"It was a general assumption … among the European Union, France, Germany, American diplomats, U.K., that Shokin was not doing his job as a prosecutor general. He was not pursuing corruption cases," Volker Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
1
"The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it" deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine Vitaliy Kasko
1
"Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2014 and 2015" Kasko
1
@ROBSwank-pm1vd "When Vice President Biden made those representations … he was representing U.S. policy at the time," Volker, Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
1
@ROBSwank-pm1vd "It was a general assumption … among the European Union, France, Germany, American diplomats, U.K., that Shokin was not doing his job as a prosecutor general. He was not pursuing corruption cases," Volker Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
1
@ROBSwank-pm1vd "The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it" deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine Vitaliy Kasko
1
@ROBSwank-pm1vd "Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2014 and 2015" Kasko
1
@RodneyBean-13 Which isn't what Quid pro quo is lol
1
@RodneyBean-13 Congress sent him to get the guy fired so how is that Quid pro quo?
1
@Doorhandletmr Has literally nothing to do with the justice system
1
Not even close
1
Not even close to quid pro quo
1
"It was a general assumption … among the European Union, France, Germany, American diplomats, U.K., that Shokin was not doing his job as a prosecutor general. He was not pursuing corruption cases," Volker Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
1
"Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2014 and 2015" Kasko
1
"The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it" deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine Vitaliy Kasko
1
Not even close
1
"When Vice President Biden made those representations … he was representing U.S. policy at the time," Volker, Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
1
"It was a general assumption … among the European Union, France, Germany, American diplomats, U.K., that Shokin was not doing his job as a prosecutor general. He was not pursuing corruption cases," Volker Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
1
"The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it" deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine Vitaliy Kasko
1
"Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2014 and 2015" Kasko
1
@formerlyknownashammerofthegods I never said trump personally appointed him. But he was still his special envoy to Ukraine🤣
1
@formerlyknownashammerofthegods Just embarrassing yourself
1
@formerlyknownashammerofthegods Trump was trying to get a foreign country to dig up dirt on a political opponent
1
@formerlyknownashammerofthegods Biden was sent by CONGRESS to do get a corrupt prosecutor removed on BEHALF OF THE US GOVERNMENT. Understand the difference yet?
1
@formerlyknownashammerofthegods " I don’t think so" Well you thought wrong. Cope
1
@hikertrash2956 Bill? What are you even talking about? What does hunter have to do with any bill?
1
@hikertrash2956 Are you drunk? lol
1
@thedin3467 Says who?
1
@thedin3467 Who made you the gatekeeper on what experience is has or doesn't have
1
@thedin3467 You dont even know what his job function was sooooo how would you know? 😂
1
Hunter already had his hearing
1
Obama lives rent free in your head
1
Obama lives rent free in your head
1
There is no quid pro quo scheme
1
"When Vice President Biden made those representations … he was representing U.S. policy at the time," Volker, Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
1
"It was a general assumption … among the European Union, France, Germany, American diplomats, U.K., that Shokin was not doing his job as a prosecutor general. He was not pursuing corruption cases," Volker Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
1
"The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it" deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine Vitaliy Kasko
1
"Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2014 and 2015" Kasko
1
@Ashphinchtersayswhat Learn how to cope
1
@Ashphinchtersayswhat Its not a violation of the Logan act or RICO statutes. Not even close
1
@JamesNorelli-lo4ke Everything, literally all made up
1
@Ashphinchtersayswhat Its already told. You lost. Learn how to cope
1
@Raindrops4891 can’t handle the truth eh?
1
@evelynminervini8368 OHH because he said it so it must be true! hahaha
1
@evelynminervini8368 This is why we call you a cult
1
@evelynminervini8368 Nobody benefited last time so why would you think next time would be any different?
1
@evelynminervini8368 Learn how to cope.
1
@evelynminervini8368 Projecting I see
1
"When Vice President Biden made those representations … he was representing U.S. policy at the time," Volker, Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
1
@seanfloyd4510 Cant be Quid pro quo if it was official US policy. Please educate yourself
1
@seanfloyd4510 Trump was trying to get a foreign country to dig up dirt on a political opponent
1
@seanfloyd4510 For something to be Quid pro quo you would have to get exchanging a policy for a PERSONAL gain, outside your job function. Thats what the law says Quid pro quo is. Swing and a miss
1
@seanfloyd4510 Joe was sent by CONGRESS to do get a corrupt prosecutor removed on BEHALF OF THE US GOVERNMENT. Understand the difference yet?
1
@seanfloyd4510 joe was sent by CONGRESS to do get a corrupt prosecutor removed on BEHALF OF THE US GOVERNMENT. Understand the difference yet?
1
@glenndavis2096 Not even close to quid pro quo as I already proved
1
@ComicHorder410 You just cant handle the truth
1
@glenndavis2096 Biden didn't personally want anything. Do you not understand what Foreign policy is?
1
@glenndavis2096 "The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it" deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine Vitaliy Kasko
1
@glenndavis2096 There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015"
1
@glenndavis2096 "Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2014 and 2015" Kasko
1
@glenndavis2096 "When Vice President Biden made those representations … he was representing U.S. policy at the time," Volker, Trump's special envoy to Ukraine
1