General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Mike W
Forbes Breaking News
comments

Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW165) on "Why Supreme Court Overturning Chevron Doctrine Swings Is The Right Move: Ty Cobb" video.

@VictimPoliticized So you have literally no idea what this ruling does. Got it
12
 @VictimPoliticized I notice you didn't actually say what the ruling does or what "the situation was before the 1984 ruling" was. lol
11
This is why we call you a cult
9
Do you have any actual idea what this ruling does?
7
@GORT70 You could always challenge the government. Nothing was ever preventing you from doing that
5
business maximize profits at the expense of the people and our environment
5
When has any agency legislated anything?
4
@williamholder2020 No, a regulation is not a law and judges aren't hired by agencies. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about, you practically admitted as much. lol
4
@williamholder2020 In what way did the ATF change the law? Specifically
3
@jenbhikes What "administrative codes, regulations, and contracts"?? Please explain
3
@jenbhikes In what way is a regulation somehow legislation?
3
@jenbhikes You know this ruling doesn't stop agency's from creating regulations under our legal guidelines right?
3
@skylarc6063 The ATF didn't redefine anything lol
3
Who are you holding water for big corporations. You think they care about you?
3
@williamholder2020 I know what the enumerated powers are. Now please answer the question
2
@williamholder2020 And you still haven't answer the question. In what way did the ATF change the law? Specifically
2
@jmareX ATF can change whatever rules they want. Rules are laws are two different things
2
@jmareX This ruling doesn't say that agency's cant interpret the law how they see fit. Did you actually read it?
2
@jamietwigg5152 Still two different things, by our own legal definitions and this ruling doesn't change the agency's ability to create regulations. Which is my point.
2
@cwkay6847 No, he most certainly did not. I asked HOW it restricts bureaucrats. Nobody has said lol
2
In what way was an agency overruling a law? Have an example?
2
@TheGreatThimble A degree is the difference between solid Ice and liquid water
2
@stanleytolle416 Why wouldn't we want to defer the experts?
1
@codyharney2997 They didn't change any definitions as that is law. They can interpret that law however they want
1
@codyharney2997 I clearly know a lot more about this than you do
1
@aaronearlswildassride7422 you’re projecting
1
@aaronearlswildassride7422 I clearly know a lot more about it than you do. Cry more
1
@aaronearlswildassride7422 you’re assuming things? Just proving my point
1
@aaronearlswildassride7422 you admitted you don’t have a clue. You just assume things. You’re not qualified to have this conversation.
1
@aaronearlswildassride7422 you clearly don’t even understand what this ruling says or does
1
@m6a1u57 You dont even know what you are talking about. Bet you dont even know what the ruling says lol
1
@mikeborrelli193 this has nothing to do with making law
1
@mikeborrelli193 civil service still have the power to interpret legislation. But that isn’t somehow writing law. Haha
1
@mikeborrelli193 agencies still have the power to create regulations. That hasn’t changed.
1
@rad_lad_2715 ⁠ “all legislative powers are vested in congress” so you admit you’re wrong lol
1
@rad_lad_2715 congress legislated that agency’s can create REGULATIONS. You’re just proving my point for me at this point.
1
@rad_lad_2715 You must have missed the part where congress legislated that the executive branch has that power 😂
1
@rad_lad_2715 hilarious the Supreme Court completely disagrees with you seeing how they fully upheld the fact that agency’s can create regulations based on their interpretation
1
@rad_lad_2715 do you still not understand that regulations and legislation is two different things? 😂
1
@rad_lad_2715 article one section one says Congress can create legislation. So they created legislation saying that executive agencies can create regulations based on their interpretation of legislation. You just can’t cope with these basic facts.
1
@rad_lad_2715 aw you got so quiet. Accepting your loss?
1
@rad_lad_2715 Wrong again
1
@rad_lad_2715 You keep confusing regulation and legislation Two different things
1
@rad_lad_2715 "Article I Section 1 All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States" See how the word is legislative powers. See how it says nothing about regulatory powers. Too easy
1
@rad_lad_2715 This is false. Article 1 doesn't say anything about regulations. Two separate things. The courts dont agree with you. You just cant accept the fact you're wrong.
1
@rad_lad_2715 Literally the same thing. Just embarrassing yourself
1
@rad_lad_2715 SCOTUS has looked at the administrative procedures act 7 times between 1971 and today. NOT ONCE has the court rules that this law is unconstitutional or that only congress can create regulation. You're just wrong. Cope
1
@rad_lad_2715 Regulations are generated by federal agencies empowered by congressional legislation. Regulations enforced by the judiciary, which is where all enforcement takes place. Swing and a miss
1
The government hasn’t lost any power
1
What was the dirty practice?
1
@JoeTchify Why are you deflecting? Answer the question please
1
@cwkay6847 This doesn't restrict anyone lol
1
@debrasnipes7431 In what why does it restrict bureaucrats? Specifically
1
@cwkay6847 Again, HOW does it restrict bureaucrats from creation regulations. Where does the ruling say they cant create regulations? Do you not understand what the word "how" means?
1
@cwkay6847 where does it say agencies aren’t allowed to interpret the law? Disputes have always gone to court. So what are you even talking about?
1
@Locke42485 I did read up on it. That’s how I know they don’t have any idea what they’re talking about
1
⁠ @Locke42485 there is nothing semantic about this. Agencies still continue to create regulations based on their interpretation of the law, which is what everybody seems to think this ruling changed, when it didn’t
1
@cwkay6847 I did read it. Thats how I know you're wrong lol
1
@codyharney2997 So you admit agency's can still create regulations, got it
1
What abuse of power? Specifically. Do you have any idea what this ruling actually does?
1
@markwebb8013 You didnt name any abuses of power whatsoever lol
1
@markwebb8013 Since when is an executive order an abuse of power? Only one of his EOs has been overturned, but that doesn't make it an abuse of power. Why are you deflecting?
1
@markwebb8013 There is no video of him saying that and even if he did it wouldnt somehow be an abuse of power, it would just mean a difference of legal opinion lol
1
@markwebb8013 This is false. You're literally just making stuff up
1