Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW165) on "Special Counsel Attorney Rips Trump Attorney For 'Extraordinarily Frightening' Answer" video.

  1. This is about immunity not insurrection
    3
  2. What was the mans name?
    2
  3. prove it
    1
  4. judges are chosen by random draw lol
    1
  5.  @kevinchambers1101  having a separate list for males and females would be discrimination 🤣
    1
  6.  @kevinchambers1101  What you suggest is discrimination
    1
  7.  @kevinchambers1101  You cant get more fair than random draw
    1
  8.  @kevinchambers1101  Its not discrimination just because its all female lol
    1
  9.  @kevinchambers1101  Just because you hate women does not mean its not fair.
    1
  10. joe lives rent free in your head
    1
  11.  @earnestleesaddened3779  You dont even know what hes calming immunity for? 😂
    1
  12.  @earnestleesaddened3779  You clearly have no idea what double jeopardy is
    1
  13.  @earnestleesaddened3779  Why are you so triggered? Was not talking to you
    1
  14.  @earnestleesaddened3779  congress is not a judicial body. They have no standing
    1
  15.  @TerryConspiracy420  Ayman al-Zawahiri was not american born or a citizen
    1
  16.  @TerryConspiracy420  You said "Obama authorized a drone strike assassination of an American born" This is not an american born man lol
    1
  17.  @TerryConspiracy420  You said OBAMA
    1
  18.  @TerryConspiracy420  That guy was born in gaza while Egypt controlled it in 1951
    1
  19.  @TerryConspiracy420  You could not even be bothered to look up this guys bio
    1
  20.  @leonardbrewer9942  Executive orders are fully legal
    1
  21.  @leonardbrewer9942  " possession of classified documents as a senator and as a vice president" is not a crime. Wilful retention is
    1
  22.  @leonardbrewer9942  A president can sign as many executive orders as they want in one day.
    1
  23.  @leonardbrewer9942  How is signing 14 EOs a crime?
    1
  24.  @sleeplessonterra9845  What actions would that be?
    1
  25.  @sleeplessonterra9845  None of that is happening or has anything to do with the admin. Cite some data the supports what you said. Bet you can’t
    1
  26.  @earnestleesaddened3779  Except his actions weren't legal
    1
  27.  @earnestleesaddened3779  Double jeopardy only applies to criminal matters. Congress is a political body and does not address criminal matters
    1
  28.  @earnestleesaddened3779  You clearly dont understand how the system works
    1
  29.  @cougar1ne  Yyou cant even ssay what the abuse of power is
    1
  30. What election interference?
    1
  31. I bet you haven't even read the constitution
    1
  32. Biden did not take any money from anyone for any favors
    1
  33. Getting the prosecutor fired was official us foreign policy literally approved my congress
    1
  34.  @jameslinmd  Its about presidential immunity
    1
  35.  @jameslinmd  Why are you so triggered?
    1
  36.  @jameslinmd  100 words can be a ramble. But 5 cant
    1
  37.  @jameslinmd  ram·ble /ˈramb(ə)l/ verb to talk or write at AT LENGTH in a confused or inconsequential way.
    1
  38.  @jameslinmd  The description of this video literally sys this haring is about presidential immunity
    1
  39.  @jameslinmd  if trump absolutely has presidential immunity then so does biden.
    1
  40.  @jameslinmd  There is no selective persecution
    1
  41.  @jameslinmd  trump is arguing absolute immunity over EVERYTHING.
    1
  42.  @jameslinmd  "Of course I was entitled, as President of the United States and Commander in Chief, to absolute Immunity"
    1
  43.  @jameslinmd  "I am entitled to is Presidential Immunity on Fake Biden Indictments"
    1
  44.  @jameslinmd  "absolute immunity shields me from criminal prosecution"
    1
  45.  @jameslinmd  Possession is not a crime with the documents. Wilful retention is.
    1
  46.  @jameslinmd  bidens possession wasn't illegal.
    1
  47.  @freakyninja3545  biden did not steal anything.
    1
  48.  @jameslinmd  Military personally and government officials are two very different things
    1
  49.  @freakyninja3545  embarrassing yourself again
    1
  50.  @jameslinmd  Funny how you're trying to move the goalpost away from trump after I proved he wants absolute immunity
    1
  51.  @jameslinmd  What law would that be? What you read it? hint: its not the presidential records act
    1
  52.  @jameslinmd  Trump was not president so why did he refuse to return them?
    1
  53.  @jameslinmd  hes in trouble with the documents because he refused to return them when asked. Not that he had them in general
    1
  54.  @jameslinmd  The President records act says NARA keeps all government records including classified docs
    1
  55.  @jameslinmd  What sense does it make to allow a former president to keep classified government material?
    1
  56.  @jameslinmd  "Upon the conclusion of a President’s term of office, the Archivist of the United States shall assume responsibility for the custody, control, and preservation of, and access to, the Presidential records of that President" - PRA
    1
  57.  @jameslinmd  the authority to keep classified docs is not in the PRA by the way
    1
  58.  @jameslinmd  NARA and the DOJ spend 18 months trying to get the records back. This is well documented
    1
  59.  @jameslinmd  Nowhere in the records at does it say the president gets to keep anything until NARA files them way
    1
  60.  @jameslinmd  "Upon the conclusion of a President’s term of office, the Archivist of the United States shall assume responsibility for the custody" What about SHALL ASSUME dont you understand?
    1
  61.  @jameslinmd  "EVERY US president in the past has kept the documents" Prove it
    1
  62.  @jameslinmd  You clearly have not even read the records act
    1
  63.  @jameslinmd  You still cant even admit you lost the election 🤣😂
    1
  64.  @jameslinmd  I literally quoted that the records act says. You just cant handle the truth
    1
  65.  @jameslinmd  What quotes or citations did you proved? Oh thats right, you dont have any
    1
  66. Ok. And?
    1
  67. No it doesn't
    1
  68. Congress is a political body. They dont have any say on judicial matters
    1
  69.  @earnestleesaddened3779  You clearly have not read the constitution
    1
  70.  @earnestleesaddened3779  Impeachment is about removal from office. Not criminal prosecution
    1
  71.  @earnestleesaddened3779  How would a DA or judge be more powerful than the president? makes no sense.
    1
  72.  @earnestleesaddened3779  double jeopardy prohibits anyone from being prosecuted twice for substantially the same crime. Congress does not prosecute people
    1
  73.  @earnestleesaddened3779  Yet you cant show any supporting evidence.
    1
  74.  @earnestleesaddened3779  Again, impeachment is political action, not a legal one.
    1
  75.  @earnestleesaddened3779  Is congress part of the judicial branch? No? Thats what I thought
    1
  76.  @earnestleesaddened3779  The president answers to the law
    1
  77.  @earnestleesaddened3779  you clearly dont know how the law works
    1
  78. not even close
    1
  79.  @freakyninja3545  False
    1
  80.  @freakyninja3545  Show some evidence then
    1
  81.  @earnestleesaddened3779  You have no evidence of money laundering
    1
  82.  @earnestleesaddened3779  you have no evidence of bribes
    1