General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Mike W
Forbes Breaking News
comments

Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW165) on "James Comer Repeatedly Asked For Evidence Tying President Biden To Family's Business" video.

@nonyabusiness557 So you have no evidence. Got it
3
@nonyabusiness557 Once again you're all talk and no substance.
3
@nonyabusiness557 Nothing I said is disputed
3
@usiness557 You keep saying they got paid by a moscow wife yet you cant show evidence of it. 🤔
3
@nonyabusiness557 IRS nor the FBI has accused him of any foreign transaction wrongdoing sooooo
3
@nonyabusiness557 you SAY they have yet you cant show us that even said it
3
@nonyabusiness557 Again, where is your supporting evidence.
3
@usiness557 Again, all talk and no substance. lol
3
@nonyabusiness557 Then it should be easy for you to show some evidence. So whats the hold up?
2
@usiness557 Just embarrassing yourself.
2
@boc Stop making excuses lol
1
@mrwintboc You have no evidence of any corruption
1
@boc Where is the evidence that lending his son money was somehow a crime? Oh thats right, you dont have any lol
1
@boc Ok, so show some evidence its not simply a father lending his son money lol
1
@mrwintboc It was proved that the text was faked. They could not even get the right color or picture correct
1
@mrwintboc Besides the fact that this allegedly happened in 2017, when joe was not in office. Thats three reasons this is a nothingburger. Take your pick
1
@boc You're done because you know you have nothing lol
1
@mrwintboc You're just deflecting
1
@mrwintboc Strange how a supposed text from 2017 had used a photo of hunter that was not taken until 2021 lol
1
@boc Strange how the text color does not match the color of actual whatsapp messages lol
1
@DrMario69 The justice department didn't do anything to "let him off".
1
@o69 Why are you acting like 90% of all federal cases dont end in a plea deal?
1
@DrMario69 Nobody would even be charged for what he did. The only reason he was charged is because hes a political target
1
@DrMario69 ou say you have statements from his business partners yet you can SHOW us any of these statements lol
1
@DrMario69 What laptop videos, what text messages? We have not seen anything you are talking about. lol
1
@o69 They only think you linked was from house republicans lol
1
@DrMario69 How haven't shown me to be incorrect on anything
1
@DrMario69 You literally still haven't provided any actual evidence lol
1
@DrMario69 WHERE in this link does Archer say anything about joe being involved in any business dealings?
1
@DrMario69 Look up the DOJ states. 90% pleas
1
@DrMario69 Everything in this link has been long debunked
1
@DrMario69 Are you really this gullible?
1
@DrMario69 Pick ANYTHING from this link and try and explain how its evidence of wrongdoing. I dare you
1
@DrMario69 This is false
1
@DrMario69 You're literally just making stuff up at this point
1
@DrMario69 Again, pick anything you think is evidence evidence of wrongdoing and explain how it is. Bet you wont
1
@DrMario69 republicans told you this stuff was true and you just believed it. Sad
1
@DrMario69 How are suspicious activity reports somehow evidence? Have you SEEN any of them? No? So how do you know?
1
@DrMario69 5 million SARs are created vary year. NONE of which usually lead to any actual wrongdoing. Not to mention this was already investigated and cleared by the FBI in 2019
1
@DrMario69 NONE of the reports say ANYTHING about money laundering lol
1
@DrMario69 Suspicions are not violations. Debubked. too easy hahaha
1
@DrMario69 Yet you cant explain HOW its somehow evidence lol
1
@DrMario69 Since when does a suspension constitute evidence of something?
1
@o69 You think you can go to a court saying " I suspect so and so" and not get laught out out the door?
1
@DrMario69 Republicans have not provided any supporting evidence of anything. All they have is hearsay
1
@DrMario69 A tv republican told you something and you believed it. Sad
1
@DrMario69 Have any of these SARs been validated? No? So how is it evidence?
1
@o69 Evidence as defined in US law "Evidence is an item or information proffered to make the existence of a fact more or less probable" So how have these SARs proved anything? Please explain
1
@DrMario69 I just posted the definition of what evidence is lol
1
@DrMario69 Being a document does not automatically make something evidence lol
1
@o69 ill ask again. Which of the SARs turned up actual wrongdoing when it was investigated??
1
@DrMario69 If an SAR was used in the HSBC case then its because after it was investigated it demonstrated actual wrongdoing
1
@DrMario69 5 MILLION SARs A YEAR and you could only find ONE case where it actually led to a prosecution in the last 15 years? That poves my point
1
@o69 OH look, after 5 minutes of reading into the HSBC case it turns out that SARS were NOT used
1
@DrMario69 " It wasn't until 2010 that the OCC finally began citing HSBC for a slew of AML shortcomings, including a backlog of unexamined accounts and FAILURES to file required Suspicious Activity Reports"
1
@DrMario69 HSBC got in trouble because they WEREN'T filing SARs hahahahahahaha
1
@DrMario69 The prosecutor jow got fired was NOT investigating anyone hunter was working for. You are mistaken
1
@o69 literally none of hunters SARs say anything about money laundering. You dont even know what they suspicions are! lol
1
@o69 a bank saying "Hey, something doesn't seem right here" is not evidence lol of anything. Its just flagging something to be checked out. Thats it.
1
@mrwintboc Except there is no bank statements or testimony
1
@usiness557 what lol?
1
@usiness557 Still cant show any evidence eh?
1
Joe did not own any companies
1
shell companies are fully legal
1
@mrwintboc Nothing comer says has any credibility
1