Comments by "dixon pinfold" (@dixonpinfold2582) on "World History" channel.

@marshalljohnson8117 Are you new? Those are tactical misspellings, my out-of-touch friend. Welcome to the internet.
6
Title: "Execution of Eichmann" Actual video: Whole life and career of Eichmann, his trial sentencing coming with 90 seconds remaining in a 21-minute video.
6
 @ibringthelastwords1358 If you really do believe that, then I think you know what you have to do. Tidy up your hovel beforehand.
5
@DeepTexas I bet you call a lot of people pompous asses once they're annoyed with the things you say.
4
@DeepTexas But you're telling me what I'm telling you. Perhaps my point escaped you; namely, that this would've been better titled "Life of Adolf Eichmann" than "Execution of Adolf Eichmann."
3
@marshalljohnson8117 They were ray cysts who did not welcome European immigrants. To this day they are full of ray cyst hatred even for the descendants of European and other immigrants.
2
After judicial proceedings, convicted Nazis like Ilse Koch ought to have been delivered for a few hours each day to crowds of countrymen and -women who had been Nazi victims. Now supplied with small stones, from behind barriers they could have effected retribution sufficient to provide some psychological compensation. The punishment which Koch and others actually received, even when it was the death penalty, was too merciful and deprived their victims of what was owed to them.
2
More than once we hear that women sought concentration camp work because it paid somewhat well. I can hardly guess why such a generous and understanding stance is taken towards their free choice, except that it is due to the mere fact they were women, for we are also told of Braunsteiner's "bestial crimes", and in other videos those of Ilse Koch and Irmgard Huber. Should we therefore inquire into the salaries of the male staff at the camps, and those of Eichmann, Himmler, et al.?
1
@dbodooley You should quote people's OCs when you reply to them in a 250-reply-long thread. I'm not about to spend ages looking up my post here.
1
@simonsmith1974 Good grief. I didn't express dissatisfaction with content of the video. It was fine. I only complained the title didn't fit. And why answer the question in your last reply? I already did suggest an alternative title in my previous reply and you just ignored it. What are you, hard of reading?
1