Comments by "dixon pinfold" (@dixonpinfold2582) on "Matt Walsh" channel.

  1. šŸ‘šŸ‘ And all the person here says is: "Yeah, right" "That's really stupid" "Oh my god" "Trans people disagree with that" and so on. (My paraphrases.) No position except "That's so not true." What a debater.
    23
  2. Ā @bryantaylor4956Ā  That's pretty insulting to 15-yr.-olds, really. I'd say a 7-yr. old level. šŸ˜„
    10
  3. That's how it goes with fanaticism.
    4
  4. I identify as rich. Wish me luck going in to my bank tomorrow and demanding a $2-million mortgage.
    4
  5. Stop it, you're getting yourself into a thrilled state in front of people. If you really must, do it in your root cellar as you've done for years.
    4
  6. Person making your bun sandwich: "Multi-grain or kaiser?" You: "A bun will suffice." Dude, if someone's trying to find out what you'd like, don't be a jerk. Maybe get counselling for that.
    3
  7. Ā @AllahfearingmanĀ  I know all there is to know about what street deals look like and that looked like one.
    3
  8. Take heart, because at last you're wrong about something; namely, being sick of being right. It's the greatest feeling, as long as you can find a way not to get used to it.
    3
  9. Yeah, probably safe to assume he'll have no descendants.
    2
  10. They insist that anyone's truth is as good as anyone else's, but if you don't follow their truth they want you fired. Eventually, very drastic action against these people is going to become necessary.
    2
  11. Are school board trustees human beings? ā€”Can't Help Wondering
    1
  12. I think some of this s^^^ has to be headed to the Supreme Court, because sooner or later there's going to be lawsuits, criminal charges, or both, and then lengthy appeals. This is probably part of why the MSM, led by the NY Times, is all aflutter with talk about how the Supreme Court is "illegitimate".
    1
  13. There's a word that's shockingly absent from discussion of these people: Fanatics.
    1
  14. It's hard to feel sorry for the man who puts up with her. No one in his right mind could love such a shrew, so it must have to do with not only a thorough lack of self-respect, but also a deep belief in the immorality of divorce. As for her, she needs long-term counselling.
    1
  15. Ā @burger_kinghornĀ  Stunning. The people who told us men could be women are now telling us that we should see people from India and China as whites, and for that reason reject them. Just stunning.
    1
  16. "Problematize" Always with the made-up words. Always with the puffed up number of syllables meant to give an impression of great learning, when really it's a Potemkin metropolis of fake erudition. I've got your dirty little number.
    1
  17. The 8 Stages of Truth in 2022: 1) Honest people with healthy minds allege or assert something ('X'); the other kind of people say it is definitely untrue and amounts to proof that the first people are deranged, lying, uneducated, cruel, bigoted, or all five. 2) It becomes forbidden to say X. Saying it on social media means having the post deleted by censors or suspension of one's account, or both. If a famous person says X it makes the news, framed as a scandal and disgrace. 3) In a few isolated locales, the number of which tends to diminish (see 2), some people, stubbornly and often at serious cost, decide to uphold X anyway. They refuse to give up. 4) The thing that makes X worth mentioning in the first place, whatever that is, grows in importance, worsens, or simply for some reason(s) fails to fade away completely. The issue itself maintains a heartbeat, if a weak one. 5) The evidence for X accumulates, simmering well out of sight of most people, who still believe with both obedience and enthusiasm what they've been told about it by the mass media and the self-appointed keepers of public truth and morality. 6) Suddenly and without warning it is acknowledged by one or two prominent among those who had consistently denied X that it might well be true, or indeed is true. It is not acknowledged, mind you, that their earlier denials were for the purpose of discrediting their opponents and advancing their own primacy or ascendancy. In other words, for power and its conspicuous exercise. 7) Ā X slowly becomesā€”if not mainstreamā€”licensed speech. 8) The obedient livestock engage in their usual mimicry and nodding their heads up and down. "Well, of course it's true. Now that there's evidence!" In this way, the viewpoint in the above video will become somewhat widespread accepted wisdomā€”but only after the thing it refers to does significant, pointless and preventable damage and harm.
    1
  18. Kink, definitely. About six different kinds rolled into one, plus multiple non-kink mental afflictions in the mix too.
    1
  19. šŸ‘I think that might be the best comment I've ever read on YouTube. šŸ‘ First time I ever made a copy of one.
    1
  20. Just because a car is coming straight at you in your lane doesn't mean anything. If you swerve, that's unconscious bias against the 'differently-laned.'
    1
  21. This business about Kinsey being a super-creep (and scary monster) is as highly interesting as it is eminently plausible. Where can I learn more about it?
    1
  22. Ā @davidduxbury7530Ā  Kenneth Williams šŸ˜†šŸ˜†šŸ˜† Omg I don't know if he can ever be surpassed. On "Just a Minute" at some point most weeks he brought down the house .
    1
  23. Ā @5D_FilmsĀ  šŸ˜¢ šŸ˜‚
    1
  24. I think the homely resent the attractive more than ever because the latter are more rare than ever, yet still soak up all the attention. Yes, the average person is far less attractive than a few decades ago. It appears that good-looking people practically stopped having children, I assume because they can have better lives without themā€”more sex partners, disposable income, free time, and all the rest. I began noticing this about 20 years ago and it's far worse now.
    1
  25. You say that "[I]n 1984, the national heroes are made-up, not pedophiles and rapists." Oh? Can we assume that? Were you never suspicious of the INGSOC brains-trust that conceived of the Junior Anti-Sex League?
    1
  26. Ā @saraa6040Ā  Yes, Huxley was one of Orwell's French teachers at Eton. Orwell thought there was something the matter with him.
    1
  27. You simply cannot believe what she believes unless 'something's not right' with you. What this whole thing actually is, is The Revenge of The People With Something Wrong With Them.
    1
  28. Where's a highly unstable Pacific coast seismic fault when you need it? We need Portland to become an island at the very, very least, right away.
    1
  29. You say that critics of "WLM" (and "All LM" too, I would assume) can never say what's wrong with it. Then you didn't read yesterday's New York Times. Its response was handled by one of its senior fashion editors (!), who wrote that Ye/West has no excuse, because now right-wingers will unleash deadly violence on black people. Yep, she wrote that.
    1
  30. "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to meanā€”neither more nor less." "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things." ā€” Through the Looking-glass, 1871 And then the part which is most relevant to us in 2022: "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be masterā€”thatā€™s all."
    1
  31. Yep. It's because so many smaller numbers divide evenly into 60, making it easy to work with. (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30. Lovely number, 60.)
    1
  32. Ā @soundseeker63Ā  No, he was fine with that. He said so. "A cute white girl is interested in my ethnicity? Which happened quite often, sure ask me."
    1
  33. World Clown Council: "Hey, stop comparing us to Jon Stewart!"
    1
  34. But the word 'critique' isn't even used here. He says the movie "will be critically acclaimed." My late mother, if she were here, would tell you to "clean the potatoes out of your ears." God bless that truth-dealing woman.
    1
  35. Ā @isorukuyamamoto7638Ā  Ok, fine. Perhaps he said that. But in that case you blew the timestamp.
    1
  36. Ā @isorukuyamamoto7638Ā  I did, sir, twice.
    1
  37. "Birds do it, Bees do it. Kinsey with a deafening report does it. Let's do it, let's fall in love" ā€” Noel Coward, Live at Las Vegas
    1
  38. Ā @jokiklos7009Ā  Just a funny bit. I of course meant nothing serious by it. I only liked that he poked fun at Kinsey's sanctimony.
    1
  39. At least 9 out of 10 such young people are simply, in their minds and their feelings, lost and adrift. Directionless and unfulfilled. Deprived of the healthful basics of both guidance and the opportunity to shape themselves, as paradoxical as that sounds. They've been sold short, some of them abused, others cruelly neglected, many others practically smothered with a surfeit of demands to conform and obey. In all this they are faultless.
    1
  40. HFS! Just HFS! Yes, I'd say you almost certainly gotta be right. I'd say you are totally on the ball, my good woman. šŸ‘
    1
  41. I'm sure it happens many times across the country in the course of a week or whatever. It's sort of a cottage industry. We of course do not hear about most of it.
    1
  42. I am almost totally with you on these, but disagree on food aromas in the lunchroom having to get unanimous approval. Other people eat what they like, live with it. You know, just like you were saying at the end: give and take.
    1
  43. "The asexual community" No Matt, it's not a community. Don't call it a community. It's a category.
    1
  44. The type of person crushed a dozen times a day, every day, by pretty much nothing. In fact it's being "crushed" that fuels his will to live. (Ordinarily I use the word 'person' a touch more rigorously, but let that pass.) "Paging Dr. Phil. White courtesy telephone at the reception desk, please."
    1
  45. Bill Maher must finally be realizing that if they're not calling you a monster you're almost certainly committing moral crimes.
    1