Comments by "dixon pinfold" (@dixonpinfold2582) on "Channel 4 News" channel.

  1.  @Jason-wm5qe  putzy lol
    1
  2.  @Jason-wm5qe  Nah. There's lots worse people than you in the world. I save mad for them. You're harmless. Cheers old man, and good health to your family and everyone you know!
    1
  3. ​ @Jason-wm5qe   You posted a foolish comment in the first place, as sanctimonious as can be, and someone nailed you on it. Be a man and stew in solitude.
    1
  4.  @Jason-wm5qe  Oh, do get lost.
    1
  5. "I hate it when other people are white." J.S.
    1
  6. You're referring to her thick makeup?
    1
  7.  @mittromney5419  Yeah, it's the greatest by far. https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2018/03/26/poll-44-of-americans-skip-doctor-visits-due-to-cost/#47af36b56f57
    1
  8.  @hollyboyd1837  Who, me? You got me mixed up with someone else, madam. Re-post to the appropriate person instead.
    1
  9.  Benghali In Platforms  October spawned a monster.
    1
  10. The point was to make him, the reporter, and the Channel 4 viewership feel wonderful about their hatred for Trump. Reasoning they consider fine for most other situations.
    1
  11. Petroshenko's personal legal troubles are entirely irrelevant to the Ukraine War and it was pointless and a waste of our time to bring them up. Well, pointless except for keeping up the interviewer's tiresome sanctimony, which I've long noticed is his leading propensity. How very Channel 4.
    1
  12. I despise this reporter for her serial interruptions. And for interrupting Corbyn half as much as she would a Tory. She has no idea what fair play is, nor good manners---and in those two areas makes every interview subject look good in comparison.
    1
  13. I take it you do not support the Conservative Party. But which party would you support whose members didn't believe it to best promote the national interest?
    1
  14.  @joemitchell1287  Surely no one likes you, who isn't equally deranged and pathetic.
    1
  15.  @joemitchell1287  Fair enough; nice and civil too. Cheers!
    1
  16.  @myfairlady343  So his dad had a good job. So what? As I understand it they had enough but were not rich and Boris was admitted to Eton on a scholarship. God, class resentment is so hideous when it extends to mere hard-working professionals. You'd think Stanley Johnson was a tech billionaire.
    1
  17. Hipsters assume everyone else is a moron. It's what they all tell each other when they get together at hipster gatherings.
    1
  18. Will you please share with us your reasons for concluding that stairwells are safer?
    1
  19.  @jonathanbell9349  Thanks for your reply. Anyone who wisely wishes to avoid getting directly next to others can simply wait for an empty or uncrowded elevator. At least entering and exiting an elevator requires only a tap with the point of a key. A trip on the stairs means grasping a doorknob both to get in and get out. Moreover, elevators at least have exhaust fans. Stairwells are commonly completely unventilated. Cheers.
    1
  20. And do you really find many elevators not even six feet wide? In my experience it's not one in ten.
    1
  21.  @jonathanbell9349  Hmm. Too close for comfort I guess, unless you're sporting a proper mask. Anyway, best wishes for the least unpleasant year possible. ( PS Here we have the largest average dwelling size of any country, but I never guessed that might extend to elevators.)
    1
  22. This guy is wrong. The importation of additional cases cannot fail to quicken the spread of the illness and push hospitals closer to peak loads, past which severely ill people must be triaged out of intensive care and thus written off (i.e. sent away to die).  He is not thinking straight, presumably because of his hatred for the president, which you could see from space.
    1
  23. Welcome to Labour Party Headquarters. Register your furious and irrational beef with the government here. Room for all, come on, squeeze in. Just show your spleen for admittance. Paid trolls and raving paranoiacs most welcome.
    1
  24. Taking aim at a little boy? That's your contribution? A grateful world beams its admiration towards you.
    1
  25.  @danhiggins9151  Perhaps you are seeing sexism where there is none. I seem to recall that the lower Rome sank and the nearer it approached calamity, the wealthier and more celebrated became its best-known cooks, becoming national figures. That's right, celebrity chefs. Whose learning, whose research was ever complete? (The Puritan saw sin everywhere, including where it was not---except, ordinarily, in the mirror.)
    1
  26. Oh, please. It's quite rational to make an economics specialist the health minister. Ordinarily, running a health ministry in the interests of national well-being and the saving of lives is very much about the wise allocation of money. And even now there's little reason to suppose a medical mind would be best. The secretary is sure to be awash in informed medical opinion at present.
    1
  27.  Prometheus 2019  Thanks for your reply, but as I never got a PhD in economics I cannot discuss the matter. You must look elsewhere for someone way up at your level. Cheers.
    1
  28. ​ @paulcopsey6573  ":...simple yes or no is not part of the act" And do you confine yourself to yes/no replies in your own life?
    1
  29.  @robert7622  lol
    1
  30. Man, check out that gigantic rude mic. Just look at that thing, I mean if somehow you failed to notice it already (I did at first). Sort of insensitive, or is it just me?
    1
  31. I dearly wish someone would teach him that lesson. And if only I could watch it, too! Ah, what a pleasant daydream.
    1
  32. 1:15 The reporter claims measures so far haven't worked, citing an increase in cases. This is a logical fallacy. To make her claim valid she has to show that without the measures the number of cases would not have skyrocketed worse. It's like saying that collisions at road intersections prove that stop signs don't work. Silly.
    1
  33. Just take out 'satanic' and I'm with you. Cheers.
    1