Comments by "dixon pinfold" (@dixonpinfold2582) on "CityNews"
channel.
-
57
-
17
-
13
-
9
-
7
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
A huge fraction of the population is really poor. They may be upright people with lower-paying or part-time jobs. Or they may be on social assistance, have little future in the job market, use drugs and be in and out of trouble with the law.
If there aren't any landlords who aren't very fussy and are willing to split up a home into tiny rooms, where on earth can such people live? They don't have the $2k a month for a more reasonable apartment and perhaps never will. (And if they suddenly all did, then the price would instantly rise to $3k.)
If landlords like this one are put out of business, many of their tenants won't find another place and will be added to the ranks of the homeless.
I can see an attempt to marginalize a really undesirable tiny fraction of the population like 2% by steering them out of decent neighbourhoods and into institutional settings, shelters, the very most run-down neighbourhoods, or even completely out of town. It's not a good way to treat people, but I know that's what most residents of most areas would prefer.
However, if the fraction is 10% or 20% that's not possible. Ordinary neighbourhoods can't be shielded any longer from a general impoverishment and social decay on the scale of the one that's occurring.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1