Comments by "dixon pinfold" (@dixonpinfold2582) on "CP24"
channel.
-
199
-
197
-
61
-
52
-
50
-
50
-
46
-
41
-
39
-
37
-
37
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
30
-
30
-
28
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@bigbrisk8423 Yes, really. It's really offensive. Death camps do not have an ever-increasing population. Death camps have no overweight people. Death camps allow no one out, unlike Gazans who, before their leaders started this war, could leave the country, could work in Israel in limited numbers, and could travel to the West Bank.
Gaza is instead a war zone, and it's a war zone thanks to Hamas. Tragically, civilians die in war zones. Speaking of WWII, civilians died in the Allied liberation of Holland. It was tragic, but the Dutch still welcomed the Allied forces as the liberators they were.
Think. Just take your time and try and think.
Thanks for your courteous reply.🙄
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
After repeated viewings and having given it some thought, my opinion is that this incident was staged by the security detail. It even appears the minister and her aide were unwitting accomplices.
The same cop has arrested Menzies before. He saw that Menzies was there, he knew the minister was coming that way, he knew Menzies would approach her, and he knew he would walk in front of her.
The real giveaway is that the cop didn't walk out to meet her and the aide; he remained standing behind the pole. It served as a barrier which Menzies would have to walk to the left of. Freeland and her aide would quite naturally walk towards the cop and his fellow officers. The idea would've been for them to 'deliver' Menzies to him.
In the event, Freeland and her aide's path steered Menzies towards the waiting cop, the narrowness of the gap between the pole and the building ensuring that the cop would only have to move scarcely half a step and Menzies would bump into him. Once Menzies moved leftwards as he had to do, the minister and the aide's path was blocked, yet only the aide adroitly bailed out onto a rightwards path. Freeland stayed with Menzies until the contact with the cop, which is strange since that portion of the sidewalk was about to end.
So who knows, maybe they did know what was intended. Beforehand there's an unnatural look of slightly smirking nonchalance. As the actual incident unfolds, neither woman's face shows surprise or concern and neither of them slows much, which it would be natural to do if what happened between Menzies and the cop were truly unexpected. The aide's face especially does not match the situation.
It just all looks choreographed like a basketball play. This didn't even come close to crossing my mind initially, and in fact not until I'd seen it several times while watching news reports on several channels. It's the last thing I'd ever expect, but the realization, or perception, has been forced upon me by simple close attention.
I know it sounds weird, and indeed it is weird by any standard, but it looks that way. This is just my opinion, I could be wrong.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@juliogonzo2718 You have to visualize what was described. The truck, according to the officer if I understood him correctly, was in the right-hand curb lane, not the centre lane.
Making such a left turn is inherently dangerous, as it involves turning into and across a lane of traffic going in the same direction. It is of course ordinarily unlawful for that reason. If in special circumstances it is permitted, as it may have been here, it has to be performed with the utmost possible attention and care.
The truck, it would certainly seem, surprised the cyclist by initiating the turn. That is quite understandable at least up to a point, since one rarely if ever encounters such a vehicle turning left from the right-hand curb lane. Possibly the cyclist ignored a warning signal, gesture or shout from the curbside worker to make way for the truck. (I wonder if the cyclist's attention was inappropriately divided or if he/she was listening to headphones.)
Still, in my view the onus is on the driver to allow for such things. I can't see the excuse to not check what's going on in the centre lane before moving. One can always simply put one's head out the window first.
Perhaps you interpreted the officer's account differently. If so, you are welcome to let me know.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Something seems wrong with the arithmetic of the "1 in 10 Torontonians" claim.
User visits to pick up food total 2.5 to 3 million per year. But food bank users can visit once per week. So the total visits divided by 52 gives us 48,000 to 58,000 year-round-equivalent users.
That raw range is 1.6% to 1.9% of the population of Toronto. Some visits, however, cover multi-person households. Multiplying by the average number of people in a Toronto household (2.4, according to StatsCan) yields 115,000 to 138,000 people. (Food bank users, however, skew towards smaller or single-person households, but let that pass.) This is about 4% of Torontonians, which is a far cry from 10%.
I suspect that the food banks are trying to report total unique users visiting at least once per year, a much higher figure based on user registrations. Presumably there are many people who only visit very occasionally, or whose income rises, enabling them to stop getting assistance. But if so, is it right to say that there are 300,000 people "relying" on food banks? (Toronto population 2023 est.: 3.0m.)
I also suspect that, since the food banks do not require ID, but just ask for users' names, some users visit multiple food banks and give different names in order to (dishonestly, if perhaps understandably up to a point) be eligible for more food. This would inflate the number of unique users.
For these reasons I take "1 in 10" with a grain of salt.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
(1) Cost to replace a Tesla battery: "The cost of a new Tesla battery ranges from $5,000 to $20,000." (Source: Insurify, 2023) Most sources say around $12,000.
(2) Lifespan: "A survey of 350 Tesla owners in Europe found that their cars dropped around five percent of their capacity after 50,000 miles before dropping much slower thereafter. The group extrapolated the data to claim they would have lost 20 percent of the original capacity after 500,000 miles." (Source: Inverse) Tesla itself says it their batteries should last 300,000 to 500,000 miles. Their warranty is for 8 years or 150,000 miles. (A Tesla motor has the same warranty and costs $6,000 to replace.)
(3) Engines/motors: Please compare this cost, longevity and warranty to those of a gasoline engine. And be sure to compare to premium cars in Tesla's range. E.g. BMW 3-Series: You can buy a knock-off brand, but "[engines made by BMW itself] cost between $15,000 and $17,000. The labor cost will vary between $2900 and $4000 ." (Source: YourBMWBlog) Total: $17,900-21,000.
(4) A gasoline-engine car has a transmission as well. A Tesla doesn't.
So you & your upvoters can feel relieved that you were earlier fed misinformation😄.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Viewer-qm3qx You ought to use Google to test your ideas, not just to try confirming them. Consider the engine, transmission, radiator, starter, alternator, exhaust system, fuel pump and fuel tank of a given BMW which costs the same off the lot as a given Tesla. Those components are the counterparts of a Tesla's battery and motor(s).
(It doesn't have to be a BMW. You can choose another premium make and model. Just don't make it a Corolla, Equinox etc.)
Find out what it costs to replace these items in the respective cars once each is off warranty and has been driven, say, 300,000 or 400,000 miles. Get back to me if you like.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@UzumakiNaruto_ I agree with all that, although I want to clarify a point about "if Canada had [...] only brought in people who were mostly peaceful, law abiding and hardworking".
I believe that most immigrants do already fit that description. The vast majority, no doubt whatsoever. But I will allow that it's probably 99.5% from Japan—yet only 95, 90 or 85% from a small group of other countries with an unfortunately strong culture of criminality across a minority of their people. One country which is a source of immigrants to Canada has a murder rate 25x the Canadian rate (!), 8x even the US rate. Heaven help the country which accepts the wrong people from it.
Few people realize what mayhem very small numbers of criminal troublemakers can cause. Consider a hypothetical group of just 100 people on the streets of, say, Toronto, who are addicted to hard drugs. They need anywhere from $50 (Fentanyl) to $500 (cocaine) per day in order to stay high most of the time. They don't have jobs, so they take to shoplifting, stealing bikes, or smashing their way into parked vehicles for valuables.
Fencing shoplifted and other stolen goods is not lucrative. Thieves commonly receive 5-10% of retail value. That's $50-$100 for a $1000 bike; $10 for $80 perfume; $20 for a $250 jacket. So that means that for a very minimal $100 a day for drugs, food, drink and other expenses, they need to steal $1,000 or more worth of stuff per day. They may on average need to commit 10 thefts in order to finance that, ranging from failed to petty to more major ones. (A car may turn out to have nothing of value inside, a stolen pair of pants may not find any takers.)
One hundred people x 10 crimes a day x 365 days in a year equals 365,000 (!) crimes a year. (These people work 7 days a week.) The total bill to their victims comes to $365,000,000. (So for 300 thieves it's over $1,000,000,000.)
Thus it's incredibly important not to allow people in who are prone to end up like that. But how can immigration officials tell? Even in the most chaotic, violent and lawless countries most people are fairly honest and law-abiding. That's the problem and I don't know what to say.
People would be up in arms if the government announced Canada will not take immigrants from the most violent or high-crime countries. Canadians want to think of themselves as "nice," even if there's a cost to society for that. They hate harsh realities which come up against their treasured self-image of "niceness." (This self-image, however, is often not justified at all. In fact, the more unjustified it is, often, the more loudly they cling to it and trumpet it.) We live in highly sanctimonious times.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
CP24, here is a short grammar lesson: "[I]f Trump was re-elected" should've been "If Trump were re-elected."
Were, not was. Don't use "was" for a hypothetical or so-called conditional construction like this one.
Usage example: It's wrong to say "If he was here, he'd put you in your place." Was is past tense, so logically he must be gone. Someone who's gone can't be here to put someone in their place. It's correct to say "If he were here, he'd put you in your place." Were indicates the hypothetical nature of the proposition that follows.
(N.B. In the conditional tense the verb is always were: If he were, if I were, if you were, if they were, if it were, etc.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't get how anyone thinks any store owes them a break on the price of anything. If you don't like it, don't give them your business. I doubt Mr. Chapman here is in the habit of lowering his prices for his consulting work (or however he makes his living).
In any case, Loblaws' gross margin, an exact reflection of their mark-up, has been pretty stable since rising from 24% in 2011 to 29.4% in 2017.
(If a company pays 75¢ for an item and sells it for $1.00, their mark-up is 33.3% and their gross margin is 25%. Note that the company does not disclose their gross margin on food vs. non-food items. It's unlikely they've been trending identically. Non-food items include pharmacy, housewares, personal care items and Joe Fresh clothing.)
Loblaws' quarterly gross margins in the past 5 years (Source: YCharts):
Latest: 31.38% (Sep 2023)
Minimum: 29.92% (Sep 2020)
Maximum: 32.37% (Mar 2023)
5-Year Average: 31.29%
5-Year Median: 31.34%
Having said all that, I personally felt somewhat bitter about the decreased discount, and in my view the most valuable maxim for any business is: If you want to keep your customers, keep your customers happy. Loblaws has done well in that regard over the years, but like every company it can't afford any major stumbles.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wow, 0.6% in March alone. The annual rate, which rose just one click to 2.9%, is misleading in a way. It tells you an awful lot about the rate 13 months earlier. Because that month (in this case March 2023) drops off the data in each report. So any time you see an annual rate change, it's just the difference between 13 months ago and one month ago.
Well, 13 months ago, it was a hot month, at 0.5%. So in today's report, it was bound to take a lot of inflation for the rate to stay near to February's annual rate, 2.8%.
And so it did: That 0.6% was definitely high. Only March 2023 dropping off kept it from looking as bad as it was. If we'd had a more moderate 0.2%, the annual rate would now be a very promising 2.5%.
So we stand at 2.9%, but the last two months have not been good. Together February and March totalled almost a full per cent (0.9%), which is very fast for a mere two months. It's about 6% annualized.
One more of these and the Bank of Canada would be well advised to reconsider cutting rates. One more and it'll be just about time to say hello to stagflation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tocarules I'm certain a lot of that's true, although close to none of it's germane to this instance. Here it was just incompetence. Still interesting though, and I salute your attentiveness to spin in any case. It's the work of a lifetime to attune oneself to it.
(From this point on I'm just rambling and you probably shouldn't read it. Sometimes I just write to find out what I think.)
Twice as hard yet is to stop yourself from seeing it when it's not even there or only in trace amounts. There's always the element of people trying (and either failing or succeeding) to do their jobs well. There's always people new in their positions, people on the verge of getting fired, people hung over or on drugs at that very moment, people sucking up or (not too likely) rebelling.
It's also a challenge to keep up with changing currents in technique, the degeneration of the j-schools, the rot in the minds of the readership, changing vocabulary, and all the rest. Human motivations never change but which ones are dominant and the forms they take morph day and night, year by year.
So having a well-thought-out opinion is not automatically an accomplishment of any sort, it's being right that counts. Any analysis of things at the 98th percentile or below isn't much good.
Like you, I gather, I've been a student of all of it for a long time. I've watched and read the news since I was 10 or 12 and indirectly it's been my bread and butter. Thanks for your interesting reply and sorry for blathering on. My compliments to you on your style and clarity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@americaofthenorth655 The investigation of that Indigo hate crime should not bother anyone (since it's totally normal police work). Unless, that is, they think that Kristallnacht (1938) was a mostly peaceful and cozy gathering.
As for carjackings, I have zero doubt they are promptly and vigorously investigated by the TPS. Zero. If you think that they are not prioritized like the serious violent crimes they are, I'd like to look at your evidence for that belief. Seriously, if that were the case I'd like to know. So get back to me with that evidence so I can start raising hell about it. I'm waiting.
Ordinary car thefts are a serious problem in their own way, to be sure. They really upset those whose vehicles go missing and disrupt their lives. That's why I'm glad to see the province respond with this increased funding.
It's what you yourself want as well, yet instead of saying "Good!", you complain as though Ford just announced he was slashing police funding by $18m.🤨
But I understand, in a way. Hyperpartisanship is a popular way for people to spend their time enjoyably and kid themselves that it makes them a good person, that it makes society better, etc.
Thanks for your reply.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cdb5001 Btw, Statscan disagrees with your statement that Toronto had the highest homicide rate of any major city in Canada in 2018. Edmonton and Winnipeg had higher rates, as did five other CMAs (Windsor, Saskatoon, etc.) The Toronto rate dropped back below the national rate in 2020 and 2021.
The City of Toronto proper had the lowest number in 2022 (70) since 2015. And the number of shooting victims (194 injured or killed) appeared to be far below levels seen in the 2010s (2018: 604). The latter levels are shown in a table in the same Wikipedia article you quoted in your last reply.
Finally, to repeat myself, the count so far in 2023, which is 3, bodes well for this year.
—————————————
My point in all this is not to paint a rosy picture. In recent years the homicide rate in Toronto has been 50-100% higher than in Montreal, and in 2018 and 2019 it was higher than the rate for Canada as a whole. Governments have to show more determination to investigate, prosecute and generally fight organized crime any way they can.
My point was just to encourage looking at all the facts, not just the worst and scariest ones.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1