General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Arch Stanton
Biographics
comments
Comments by "Arch Stanton" (@archstanton6102) on "Wallis Simpson and Edward VIII: The Marriage that Changed History" video.
You should do Edward and George's brother Prince George Duke of Kent. He died in a plane crash in WW2 and was reportedly gay. Lots of mystery and speculation about his life and death.
37
@rhodesianwojak2095 your comment makes little sense. Can you explain further why his child would not look like Harry?
14
@BigHenFor Saw your reply to Amber Powell, I think by using the word "shady", what she means is "person of colour" or "mixed race". Amber just doesn't want to sound overly racist
12
@diegomorata2885 Why? France, Germany, China, Russia, USA all survive and prosper without a monarch + lots of other European countries manage well following WW2 and removal of monarchy
8
When Wallis died they held an auction of her jewellery. It was reported that Princess Diana wanted to bid on some Prince of Wales styled pieces, as she was still married to Charles at the time. However she was prevented from doing so by Elizabeth the Queen Mother who hated Wallis.
8
@caligulalonghbottom2629 Also the daughter of an SS cavalry officer...
3
@quanbrooklynkid7776 Oh so you are racist. Why not just say that. Best you spend more time in school working on your spelling and grammar than typing crap on YouTube.
3
Theodore Macewko Dr Zhivago is a work of fiction. A novel made into a film - it is not a documentary. You do understand that? And I said prosper as in current times. All countries that ditch their monarchies go through a transition period and then emerge stronger.
1
Theodore Macewko They do it for dramatic license to make the film more exciting. Look at pearl harbour by Michael Bay so much added non-history
1
@ANASF1683 Yes you are correct all of those countries went through wars, violence, dictatorships. But they have emerged to be productive, prosperous societies without royal families. The UK can do the same. The queen was recently used as a optical tool by prime minister to push through an act deemed illegal by the courts. So either she was complicit or has no power and therefore has no use. Let's not even discuss Prince Andrew and his family.
1