Comments by "Louie Berg" (@louieberg2942) on "Bad Sponsors with Michelle Wolf: Unlucky Charms Cereal, Tampoons" video.

  1. Goes to show that there's more to being attractive than just being attractive "on paper/in theory". Not to say that Michelle Wolf is ugly, not at all. Just that she's not what you'd call a classic beauty. The way one carries him/herself is very important and it can elevate as well as detract from someone's attractiveness. Yes, I feel weird having spent time elaborating on this. Somehow felt compelled to do it.
    28
  2. I suppose what I did was exactly more than that, though. But yes, because she's a woman I actually evaluated (in that post) something I wouldn't when I would be watching a man, as I was evaluating attractiveness and I'm not attracted to men. I, personally, already evaluated Seth's qualities as a presenter and show host. Surely I made a post about that at some point in time as well. Same for Michelle regarding her abilities as comedienne etc. It just didn't happen in this particular instance, but it doesn't mean it didn't happen at all.
    3
  3. +Emily Schueller Myeah, but it's still different. For Cumberbatch I'd think "What makes him attractive to people who are attracted to men" and can't use myself as a point of reference. Although I admit I worded it too strongly earlier on. I can, when someone starts talking about it, think about what makes a person attractive. For women I'm more likely to answer "attractive to me" and for men "attractive in general". Still, when someone remarks a particular woman is attractive and I don't find her attractive at all... I guess it was a bit of a shorthand and the distinction doesn't lie with man or woman.
    3