Comments by "" (@larsstougaard7097) on "CaspianReport"
channel.
-
754
-
652
-
529
-
132
-
114
-
68
-
61
-
56
-
52
-
44
-
36
-
35
-
32
-
31
-
27
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
23
-
20
-
20
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
DavetheSlave I totally agree, geopolitics has done much harm, but there are many layers in it. And there are cases where it has been clearly a bad idea like Venezuela: " After Hugo Chávez officially took office in February 1999, several policy changes involving the country's oil industry were made to explicitly tie it to the state under his Bolivarian Revolution. Since then, PDVSA has not demonstrated any capability to bring new oil fields onstream since nationalizing heavy oil projects in the Orinoco Petroleum Belt.
The Chávez government used PDVSA resources to fund social programmes, treating it like a "piggybank",and PDVSA staff were required to support Chávez. His social policies resulted in overspending that caused shortages in Venezuela and allowed the inflation rate to grow to one of the highest rates in the world. To assuage the oil price decline which began back in June 2014 and continues through to today, President Maduro printed more currency, resulting in inflation as high as 700% of what the inflation rate was in 2014.[The Economic policy of the Nicolás Maduro administration did not revive the oil decline, and by 2016, the oil production reached the lowest it had been in 23 years. According to analysts, the economic crisis suffered under President Nicolás Maduro would have still occurred with or without Chávez"
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@filip8985 thank you for your sharing 🙏. Yes I know it's a huge change we need to make on many levels to make it work. Regarding population size I see many problems stem from that in the first place. Some researchers say the Syrian civil war was triggered by drought and a big population. In 1950 there were 3 million Syrians, now (2021) 25 millions are scattered all over the place. 1 million Syrian refugees in Lebanon, a country that has almost collapsed, 3.5 million in Turkey creating a number of problems. Image Syrian population was only growing like Denmark the last 70 years, from 4.5 million to 5.5 millions, where 500.000 are immigrants. Take Madagascar despite a wealth of abundant and diverse natural resources, Madagascar is one of the world's poorest countries. They went from 4.5 million people in 1955 to around 30 million today. There are great hunger there at the moment, much pain and suffering. I would say that Island can't sustain 30 million people in a balanced way. Jordan , one the most dry places in the world , has very little water, went from 600.000 to 10 million people, they struggle every day. The future looks very bleak. Nigeria will never get out of deep deep poverty because population growth run amok. It's very sad. They are 206 million people going to be 260 million people the next 8 years. Can't you see what implications it has on the country and it neighbors, conflicts and pain. Many of them live of $ 3 a day, no government can help them out of poverty. It's super positive that Japan will go from 125 million people to 80 million the next 80 years, same with China 1,4 billion to around 1 billion. But we will still hit 11 billion people the next 80 years. 100 of more millions that want a polluting car , a mobile phone, a house etc. Wild capitalism and the idea of constant growth in a limited world of resources is extremely destructive, we are heading for some sort of collapse. Look into what makes a healthy sustainable eco system any place, it's balance between the parts and numbers. Our problem is that we are the top of the food chain on this planet, no one holding us accountable and we don't respect nature and its systems. We need to be adaptive and creative with whatever challenge we meet, we know what is coming. The UN Climate repports the last 30 years are very accurate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1