Comments by "T McD" (@tmcd5049) on "Jordan Peterson Spreads Right-Wing Conspiracy Theories About Antifa" video.
-
17
-
@gnubbiersh647 I can tell you are a RW, as subtlety and nuance never enters your arguments.
In general, it is better for a child to have two parents. But it obviously depends on the parents: some parents have a toxic relationship that is not going to enable a child to thrive in.
So sometimes, two women, or two men might do a better job of raising that child. Or sometimes just the one parent will do.
When these alternatives fail, as they sometimes do, this is partially due to the lack of support from the community. In the most powerful economy in the world, we could easily provide help for all kinds of families, but legislatively the support is mainly just for the nuclear family. It should be for everyone, and be further-reaching, but the powerful have the system rigged against us, while providing them with MASSIVE TAX CUTS. Which they occasionally spend on propaganda against welfare programmes.
This nuclear family concept is pushed by an indoctrinating church crowd, or politicians trying to appeal to them, that want to force behaviours onto the masses: it is almost fascistic in it's propagandic fervour. We can tell you've already drank the kool-aid.
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 Look at you, you're all "facts" now!
Some statistics might show what you allege, (sources please), but it's possible other studies might be more pragmatic. Either way, common sense says people should vary from that model when necessary for the child's wellbeing. Conservative a*holes attack that notion whenever they can, usually talking about a mythical, magically happy nuclear family, and therefore liberals and apparently Antifa, attack those beliefs. So what? What's your beef?
Anyway, congrats on your excellent "whatabout", but the OP says you should be anti-fascist. Instead you change the subject from Antifa to BLM. So are you anti- or pro-fascist???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1