Comments by "T McD" (@tmcd5049) on "Did Tucker prove me wrong on Trump assassination?" video.

 @markg.7865 He's sounded like him/ her/ it/ them for years.
7
 @DebWyndham Surely you mean "WORD"?
5
 @jimohara both-sidesing your way into Putin's good books, komrade...
4
Only if you assume him to be acting in good faith! Actually "acting" is an apposite word: he's making up sh!t he doesn't necessarily believe, because his grift demands it - the bigger the lie, the better.
4
@Majestros Citation: Everything *ucker said on Fox, ever!
3
@jaywill742 Like you Fox-dolts know anything about bubbles! Sheesh!
2
@Majestros ... said the Qult member.
2
@smittyachenko3129 ... without being entirely delusional. There, fixed your rant for you.
2
@ForCrynOutLoud That's how we can judge *ucker so easily, holding him in comparison to greats like David who don't have enough to lie to get the American people on their side.
1
 @jaywill742 nobody likes the turd, what are you talking about?
1
A sweating, orange *ucker drones on incessantly in a conspiratorial light: where've we seen this clown show before?
1
He's definitely still right @Majestros
1
 @JC-tp5lz based.
1
@JC-tp5lz Internet-age slang for 'based in reality' or fact. Like the word "Word". Or saying "True".
1
@vincestapels2022 Whereas *ucker does it jussst right!
1
@JustinB-rl6vz I know feelings mean more to you than facts, but the registered repuke who tried to take out Rumpty-Dumpty was not foretold by *ucker Carlson, not even in your fairystory.
1
@hockey_highlights_and_more ... the one with Stormy Daniels, you mean?
1
 @leviashanken2506 Even a stopped clock is right two times a day! In fact he was wrong: a registered republikkklan tried to assassinate tRumpty-dumps.
1
 @DebWyndham For fellating tRump?
1
 @jaywill742 Facts don't care about your feelings.
1
@Lordyung89 That's right.
1
@keithnandin1053 How was he right?
1
@smittyachenko3129 How was he right?
1
@smittyachenko3129 He implied Dems would try it. They didn't, one of your discontents did. Why ask after watching the video, have you been in a car crash? Are you alright?
1
@kimmonurmi3074 Voting a twice impeached, civily-liable rap!st, convicted on 34 counts felon who tried to start a coup/ insurrection, who loudly dog-whistles the rac!st neo-nazis is good for the country how? How does it benefit the world, pray tell?
1
@smittyachenko3129 Watch the clip: there is a narrative there: Dems supposedly tried to defund the Rump, impeach him, convict him and if "you do the math" he intones conspiratorially, assassination is the ultimate logical step. He does say that both parties are threatened by tRump, but gives no reason why Repukes might kill him, in fact the possibility actually weakens the narrative, and most logical people would conclude he hadn't meant to weaken his own narrative with that implied mention of his own party, he probably misspoke (he's a complete bell-end, after all). Look up 'no true Scotsman' fallacy, by the way: you clearly have much to learn. Shame you don't have the media literacy to work that out for yourself. Or maybe get some rest, your brain is obviously not at peak efficiency.
1
@kimmonurmi3074 I'm blind and don't understand anything going on: I endorse Republikkklans and Conald "Gay" tRump too, especially when they decided to deny women like you the right to abortion even if you were rap.ed.
1
@keithnandin1053 Read my long comment -and watch the vid. Tucker had a narrative not served by talking about Repukes killing tRumpty-Dump. He was clearly describing Dems. Anyone honest with an IQ of 50 or more could work that out!
1
@gtngole118 But it didn't!
1
@MisterMcKinney So what?
1