General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
T McD
David Pakman Show
comments
Comments by "T McD" (@tmcd5049) on "Trump and MAGA visibly confused about Espionage Act" video.
@tenkenroo We'll soon see the consequences. But you're definitely thinking like a tRump.
32
@PaulDormody Hopefully that indictment is coming soon.
14
Didn't * Punishment * 👍
14
@goodlookingman4489 His lawyers were wasting time pretending to negotiate, when he had, and still has, no intention of returning them. That's part of the problem here, but I don't expect a magat to understand...
9
@goodlookingman4489 Actually, no, the law is the law, your ignorance of the law WILL NOT SAVE tRUMP.
7
@charlottesmom Well I... I suppose I did! I've been under tremendous strain recently, and very tired... I guess I didn't think it through! Just like a magat! 😂 😂 😂 😉
4
@goodlookingman4489 As BB-rh2ml rightly points out, the DOJ/prosecuction team have accessed the evidence (that you do not have access to) and have realised the court case is warranted, not just on one count, not just on two counts... but on 37 counts. Conald has ignored his best lawyers apparently, and taken the legal advice of Tommy Vitton, a non-lawyer. Do I have to tell you that was a foolish thing to do, and he'll probably fail bigly, just as his pathetic one term in office failed bigly? Get a clue, man, and ditch the Conservative propaganda that is keeping you so ill-informed... 🤡
4
But there was no mention of infeasible wigs...
4
@goodlookingman4489 Ah, so you're arguing that a jury of his peers can't be trusted, even though this case is being tried in Florida, where he is very popular, and that jury might show MAGA bias? So that jury will likely act in his favor, and you STILL have a problem with the process? Boy, you want to keep your cake, and eat it, don't you? Rather like Dump, you want to have it all...
3
No, the country's running out of the usual resin.
3
@charlottesmom Thanks, I love it when I do manage to make people laugh... intentionally, that is!
2
@oldmanfromoc7684 Somehow he's leading most of the ret@rds in this country. (Sorry, I shouldn't say such things).
1
Quite possibly. Winding up the prosecution might not be the best way to do it...
1
@Blasted2Oblivion Thanks, Blasted.
1
@goodlookingman4489 Hmmm... so your solution is to throw it to the one court we KNOW is definitely BIASED IN HIS FAVOR. You think I'd be happy with that? What kind of idiot are you??? At least with a jury the two sets of lawyers can exclude obviously biased jurors. Not so supreme court FASCISTS (*Ahem*) I meant judges appointed by Chump.
1
@suzyfarnham3165 But posting BS is what he's paid BIG rubles to do!
1