Youtube comments of Fumble_ Brewski (@fumble_brewski5410).

  1. 1300
  2. 760
  3. 599
  4. 288
  5. 272
  6. 265
  7. 261
  8. 245
  9. 237
  10. 217
  11. 192
  12. 188
  13. 181
  14. 179
  15. 175
  16. 159
  17. 156
  18. 153
  19. 144
  20. 136
  21. 135
  22. 129
  23. 122
  24. 120
  25. 116
  26. 108
  27. 108
  28. 88
  29. 83
  30. 67
  31. 66
  32. 66
  33. 64
  34. 63
  35. 58
  36. 58
  37. 57
  38. 55
  39. 54
  40. 51
  41. 48
  42. 47
  43. 45
  44. 45
  45. 44
  46. 41
  47. 39
  48. 39
  49. 39
  50. 38
  51. 38
  52. 36
  53. 36
  54. 34
  55. 32
  56. 31
  57. 31
  58. 30
  59. 29
  60. 29
  61. 29
  62. 29
  63. 27
  64. 27
  65. 26
  66. 26
  67. 24
  68. 24
  69. 24
  70. 24
  71. 23
  72. 23
  73. 23
  74. 23
  75. 22
  76. 21
  77. 21
  78. 19
  79. 19
  80. 19
  81. 19
  82. 19
  83. 18
  84. 18
  85. 18
  86. 18
  87. 18
  88. 17
  89. 17
  90. 17
  91. 17
  92. 17
  93. 17
  94. 16
  95. 16
  96. 16
  97. 16
  98. 16
  99. 15
  100. 15
  101. 15
  102. 15
  103. 15
  104. 15
  105. 14
  106. 14
  107. 14
  108. You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today who call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be known, Ashkenazi Jews. This simply means “German” Jews. The name “Ashkenaz” can be traced back to Gen. 10:2-3, where the sons of Japheth (NOT Shem) are listed. One of Japheth’s sons is Gomer, who begat Ashkenaz. Please note that Ashkenaz is NOT in the line of Shem, and therefore is NOT a Semite. Ashkenazi Jews are actually Gentiles by descent. The fact that their ancestors may have converted to rabbinic Judaism many centuries ago, does NOT make them Israelites, nor does it entitle them to any Biblical claim to the land of Palestine. That would be akin to someone converting to Shintoism, and then claiming to be Japanese, along with the right to territory in Japan. Preposterous. These people knowingly lie to the world with their claims that the land of Israel is theirs by birthright, when in actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in modern-day Georgia, in the southern Caucasus. The only residents of Palestine that are descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob would probably be the Sephardic, Mizraic and Yemenite Jews. So, next time you hear an Israeli Prime Minister bleating about the so-called persecution or harassment of the Jews, consider this: EVERY Prime Minister of Israel since 1948 has been an Ashkenazi Jew. Therefore when all these Prime Ministers, all of whom are Ashkenazi Jews, have curried favor with the West for their re-establishment of a Jewish homeland, they have knowingly and deliberately lied, as they were never from that region, and they well know it, because it is they who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews.
    14
  109. 14
  110. 14
  111. 14
  112. 14
  113. 14
  114. 13
  115. 13
  116. 12
  117. 12
  118. 12
  119. 12
  120. 11
  121. 11
  122. 11
  123. 11
  124. 11
  125. 11
  126. 11
  127. 11
  128. 11
  129. 11
  130. 11
  131. 10
  132. 10
  133. 10
  134. 10
  135. 10
  136. 10
  137. 10
  138. 10
  139. 10
  140. 10
  141. 10
  142. 10
  143. 10
  144. 10
  145. 10
  146. 10
  147. 10
  148. 9
  149. 9
  150. 9
  151. 9
  152. 9
  153. 9
  154. 9
  155. 9
  156. 9
  157. 9
  158. 9
  159. 9
  160. 8
  161. 8
  162. 8
  163. 8
  164. 8
  165. 8
  166. 8
  167. 8
  168. 8
  169. 8
  170. 8
  171. 8
  172. 8
  173. 8
  174. 8
  175. 8
  176. 8
  177. 8
  178. 8
  179. 8
  180. 8
  181. 8
  182. 8
  183. 8
  184. 8
  185. 8
  186. 7
  187. 7
  188. 7
  189. 7
  190. 7
  191. 7
  192. 7
  193. 7
  194. 7
  195. 7
  196. 7
  197. 7
  198. 7
  199. 7
  200. 7
  201. 7
  202. 7
  203. 7
  204. 7
  205. 7
  206. 6
  207. 6
  208. 6
  209. 6
  210. 6
  211. 6
  212. 6
  213. 6
  214. 6
  215. 6
  216. 6
  217. 6
  218. 6
  219. 6
  220. 6
  221. 6
  222. 6
  223. 6
  224. 6
  225. 6
  226. 6
  227. 6
  228. 6
  229. 6
  230. 6
  231. 6
  232. 6
  233. 6
  234. 6
  235. 6
  236. 6
  237. 6
  238. 6
  239. 5
  240. 5
  241. 5
  242. 5
  243. 5
  244. 5
  245. 5
  246. 5
  247. 5
  248. 5
  249. 5
  250. 5
  251. 5
  252. 5
  253. 5
  254. 5
  255. 5
  256. 5
  257. 5
  258. 5
  259. 5
  260. 5
  261. 5
  262. 5
  263. 5
  264. 5
  265. 5
  266. 5
  267. 5
  268. 4
  269. 4
  270. For ONCE in his life, JB has a valid point. Russia HAS to take Ukraine in order to secure the choke point(s) she formerly held during her days as the USSR. Before the breakup of the Soviet Union, Russia held all 9 (land) choke points. After the breakup, Russia was reduced to only 1. As a land power, Russia is inherently vulnerable. It sits on the European plain with few natural barriers to stop an enemy coming from the west. East of the Carpathian Mountains, the plain pivots southward, and the door to Russia opens. It should be no surprise then that Russia’s national strategy is to move its frontier as far west as possible. The first tier of countries on the European Peninsula’s eastern edge—the Baltics, Belarus, and Ukraine—provide depth from which Russia can protect itself, and also provide additional economic opportunities. With regard to the current battle over Ukraine, the Russians have to assume that the Euro-American interest in creating a pro-Western regime has a purpose beyond Ukraine. From the Russian point of view, not only have they lost a critical buffer zone, but Ukrainian forces hostile to Russia have moved toward the Russian border. FYI, from Kharkiv to Moscow is only 648km (403 miles). At the same time, the West cannot assume that Russia—if it reclaims Ukraine—will stop there. Therefore, we are in the classic case where two forces assume the worst about each other. But Russia occupies the weaker position, having lost the first tier of the European Peninsula. It is struggling to maintain the physical integrity of the Motherland. Russia is a relatively poor nation. Therefore, it isn’t prosperity that binds the country together, but a shared idealized vision of and loyalty toward Mother Russia. And in this sense, there is a deep chasm between both Europe and the United States (which use prosperity as a justification for loyalty) and Russia (for whom loyalty derives from the power of the state and the inherent definition of being Russian). Russia must expand or die--it's as simple as that. And both parties know this to be true. Therefore, unless some type of peace treaty can be negotiated between all concerned parties, military conflict between the USA/NATO and Russia is inevitable. Have a nice day.
    4
  271. 4
  272. 4
  273. 4
  274. 4
  275. 4
  276. 4
  277. 4
  278. 4
  279. 4
  280. 4
  281. 4
  282. 4
  283. 4
  284. 4
  285. 4
  286. 4
  287. 4
  288. 4
  289. 4
  290. 4
  291. 4
  292. 4
  293. 4
  294. 4
  295. 4
  296. 4
  297. 4
  298. 4
  299. 4
  300. 4
  301. 4
  302. 4
  303. 4
  304. 4
  305. 4
  306. 4
  307. 4
  308. 4
  309. 4
  310. 4
  311. 4
  312. 4
  313. 4
  314. 4
  315. 4
  316. 4
  317. 4
  318. 4
  319. 4
  320. 4
  321. 4
  322. 4
  323. 4
  324. 4
  325. 4
  326. 4
  327. 4
  328. 4
  329. An electromagnetic field (EMF) is an area of moving electrical charges. Some EMFs, especially those involving ionizing radiation, can be harmful. For most people, exposure to EMFs occurs on a daily basis, as the fields are virtually everywhere. These fields can come from natural sources, such as thunderstorms, or they may be manufactured, as are radio waves, microwaves, and X-rays, for example. According to some "experts," EMFs from manufactured sources, such as microwaves, do not damage human health at the level of exposure that people experience on a day-to-day basis. However, there is no unanimity of opinion in this matter. There are two types of EMF. One has the capacity to break chemical bonds (ionizing) and the other does not (non-ionizing). Fields of ionizing radiation have higher frequencies and shorter wavelengths. The energy from this type of radiation can remove electrons from atoms, including those comprising water and living tissue. This breaks chemical bonds. In the human body, high doses of ionizing radiation can prompt unstable atoms called free radicals to cause oxidative damage. Some more common sources of ionizing radiation are gamma rays, which can help treat cancer, and X-rays. Visible light exists toward the middle of the spectrum, marking the dividing line between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. High-band 5G uses frequencies of 24–47 GHz, near the bottom of the millimeter wave band, although higher frequencies may be used in the future. The spectrum ranging from 24.25 to 29.5 GHz has been the most licensed and deployed 5G mmWave spectrum range in the world. These high-band frequencies have the potential to adversely affect human health, according to some "experts." Health concerns aside, the introduction of 5G has created some cybersecurity risks, notes the U.S. Department of Homeland and Security. One fear is malicious software and hardware being introduced into the 5G supply chain. Plus, 5G uses more information than previous technologies, which leaves more room for error. Because of these concerns, the department has developed a set of strategic standards designed to mitigate risk. While concerns regarding hackers using 5G to steal data or too many people texting in-flight are valid, when it comes to potential effects on your health, the evidence goes both ways. The fact that 5G technology has been rolled out without sufficient studies on how it may impact human health is a major red flag.
    4
  330. 4
  331. 4
  332. 4
  333. 3
  334. 3
  335. 3
  336. 3
  337. 3
  338. 3
  339. 3
  340. 3
  341. 3
  342. 3
  343. 3
  344. 3
  345. 3
  346. 3
  347. 3
  348. 3
  349. 3
  350. 3
  351. 3
  352. 3
  353. 3
  354. 3
  355. 3
  356. 3
  357. 3
  358. 3
  359. 3
  360. 3
  361. 3
  362. 3
  363. 3
  364. 3
  365. 3
  366. 3
  367. Swiss Banking privacy and secrecy have been in force since as far back as banks can trace their origins, and officially codified as part of Swiss laws, with severe criminal penalties for any violations, since the Swiss Banking Law of 1934. This law was enacted as a direct result of French Socialist-fervor pressure, and German Nazi attempts at intrusion. The Swiss take their clients’ confidentiality quite seriously. Swiss bankers are under strict fiduciary obligation (much like U.S. “attorney-client privilege”) to maintain any information about a client’s account strictly confidential, with the only exceptions being strictly-provable criminal inquiries–and even these are quite rarely granted. This reflects the long-standing tradition of Swiss personal privacy, and any violation of banking secrecy constitutes an offense that by law requires public prosecution and results in official criminal proceedings. Needless to say, these are among the strictest banking confidentiality laws in the world. Another item worthy of note is that an accusation of tax evasion alone is not sufficient to force a Swiss bank to lift its veil of secrecy. This is because failure to report income or assets is not considered a criminal offense in Switzerland, it is considered a misdemeanor, and hence does not fall under the “provable criminal activity” or criminal intent exceptions that would allow the veil to be lifted. As such, neither the Swiss government, nor any other government, can obtain information about a depositor’s account without first convincing a Swiss judge that a serious crime (felony) has been committed by the depositor that would be punishable by the Swiss Penal Code. That being said, as a U.S. citizen trying to open a bank account in Switzerland, you may be met with some reluctance. if not outright disdain, by the Swiss banking authorities. Not that they dislike you personally because you're an American, but rather they might view you as not worth the extra trouble because of the predatory rules and practices of the U.S. Treasury Department that follow all Americans regardless of where they park their money. IRS regulations keep on getting more draconian year by year, and, unless you're among the super-rich, the Swiss bankers might consider you as simply not worth the headache vis-a-vis the extra paperwork and compliance rules that accompany you as a U.S. citizen. Sad, but true.
    3
  368. 3
  369. 3
  370. 3
  371. 3
  372. 3
  373. 3
  374. 3
  375. 3
  376. 3
  377. 3
  378. 3
  379. 3
  380. 3
  381. 3
  382. 3
  383. 3
  384. 3
  385. 3
  386. 3
  387. 3
  388. 3
  389. 3
  390. 3
  391. 3
  392. 3
  393. 3
  394. 3
  395. 3
  396. 3
  397. 3
  398. 3
  399. 3
  400. Mormonism (the LDS church) is a non-christian cult. Mormonism denies the doctrines that make Christianity what it is, and it substitutes their new and different doctrines that are not taught in the Bible. For example, the Bible says there’s only one God in all existence (Isaiah 43:10; 44:6; 45:5), but Mormonism says there are many gods, (Mormon Doctrine, p. 163). See also, “And they (the Gods) said: Let there be light: and there was light,” (Book of Abraham 4:3).Furthermore, Mormonism teaches that the Trinity is actually three separate gods (Articles of Faith, by James Talmage page 35) and that salvation is attained through obedience to the law and doing good works (Miracle of Forgiveness, Spencer W Kimball, page 206). In fact, in their book Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 1, page 188, it says there is no salvation without accepting Joseph Smith, Jr. as a prophet of God. Joseph Smith, of course, was the founder of Mormonism. Mormonism, also called The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS), teaches the following non-Christian, non-biblical doctrines. (Note that all the documentation is taken from Mormon writers and Mormon scriptures): —God used to be a man on another planet, (Mormon Doctrine, p. 321; Joseph Smith, Times and Seasons, vol. 5, p. 613-614; Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, vol. 2, p. 345; Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 7, p. 333). —God resides near a star called Kolob, (Pearl of Great Price, p. 34-35; Mormon Doctrine, p. 428). —“The Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man’s…” (Doctrines and Covenants 130:22). (NOTE: Jesus himself said, “God is spirit, and they that worship him must worship in spirit and in truth.”) John 4:24 —God is in the form of a man, (Joseph Smith, Journal of Discourses, vol. 6, p. 3). —“God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens!!! . . . We have imagined that God was God from all eternity. I will refute that idea and take away the veil, so that you may see,” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 345). (NOTE: The Bible clearly states, “God is NOT a man…) Numbers 23:19 —After you become a good Mormon, you have the potential of becoming a god, (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 345-347, 354). There is a mother goddess, (Articles of Faith, by James Talmage, p. 443). God is married to his goddess wife and has spirit children, (Mormon Doctrine, p. 516). —The Trinity is actually three separate Gods: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. “That these three are separate individuals, physically distinct from each other, is demonstrated by the accepted records of divine dealings with man,” (Articles of Faith, by James Talmage, p. 35). —“One of the most fallacious doctrines originated by Satan and propounded by man is that man is saved alone by the grace of God; that belief in Jesus Christ alone is all that is needed for salvation,” (Miracle of Forgiveness, Spencer W. Kimball, p. 206). —Good works are necessary for salvation (Articles of Faith, by James Talmage, p. 92). —“We know that it is by grace that we are saved, AFTER all we can do,” (2 Nephi 25:23). I could go on and on, but that would be superfluous. All of the above shows that Mormonism is not compatible with Biblical Christianity, but rather is a non-Christian cult.
    3
  401. 3
  402. 3
  403. 3
  404. 3
  405. 3
  406. 3
  407. 3
  408. 3
  409. 3
  410. 3
  411. 3
  412. 3
  413. 3
  414. 3
  415. 3
  416. 3
  417. I spent 18 months in Fairbanks, Alaska while serving in the military. The winter climate there was as close to being on another planet as you could get without ever leaving Earth. Going outside in the dead of winter, when overnight temperatures got as low as -60 F (-51 C) required all of your protective gear to be worn. Even dressed to the max, walking was slow and painful, as your joints became stiff. Normal breathing was painful because of the extreme low humidity and temperature. About the only thing you didn't need compared to Mars was an oxygen helmet! And now people are engaging in this collective fantasy that they can somehow reach and colonize Mars, a place that makes Alaska look like Miami Beach by comparison. Even if someday people could reach Mars safely (doubtful), there's simply no way to build a growing, self-sustaining colony on that planet. And this pales into insignificance when one considers the folly of trying to journey to another solar system to colonize an "Earth-like" exoplanet, if one can be found. The sheer time and distance of such an attempt is simply beyond present human capability. And achieving FTL travel, such as we see in Star Trek/Star Wars, is not even on the remote horizon. Face it, people, we are stuck here on good, old planet Earth. And that sobering fact should motivate all of us to redouble our efforts to make our forever home as livable as possible. (Note: it may be possible, at great effort and expense, to establish some type of mining operation on the Moon, for the purpose of extracting rare/valuable minerals, but such would be done on a rotational basis for the crew, as the moon's gravity is only 16% of the Earth's, plus time on the lunar surface must be carefully limited due to exposure to solar/cosmic radiation, so living quarters must be underground.)
    3
  418. 3
  419. 3
  420. 3
  421. 3
  422. 3
  423. 3
  424. 3
  425. 3
  426. 3
  427. 3
  428. 3
  429. 3
  430. 3
  431. 3
  432. 3
  433. 3
  434. 3
  435. 3
  436. 2
  437. 2
  438. 2
  439. 2
  440. 2
  441. 2
  442. 2
  443. 2
  444. 2
  445. 2
  446. 2
  447. 2
  448. 2
  449. 2
  450. 2
  451. 2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 2
  462. 2
  463. 2
  464. 2
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. 2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483. 2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502. 2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 2
  507. 2
  508. 2
  509. 2
  510. 2
  511. 2
  512. 2
  513. 2
  514. 2
  515. 2
  516. 2
  517. 2
  518. 2
  519. 2
  520. 2
  521. 2
  522. 2
  523. 2
  524. 2
  525. 2
  526. 2
  527. 2
  528. 2
  529. 2
  530. 2
  531. 2
  532. 2
  533. 2
  534. 2
  535. 2
  536. 2
  537. 2
  538. 2
  539. 2
  540. 2
  541. 2
  542. 2
  543. 2
  544.  @Nikosi9  "The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.'" (Psalm 14:1) So, I guess that you have two options, friend. Either you humble yourself before the Almighty and acknowledge him for who he is. Or, you take your place with the rest of those foolish people that deny Him. The choice is yours. God isn't going to drag anyone kicking and screaming into his kingdom. It's not that people CAN'T believe in God--it's that they WON'T believe. Or to quote renowned British biologist, scholar and humanist, Sir Julian Huxley, "I suppose the reason we (atheists) leaped at (Darwin's) The Origin of Species was because the idea of God interfered with our sexual mores." Well, I can't agree with his decision, but I have to at least acknowledge his honesty and candor. As a former agnostic myself, the reason I resisted coming to faith in God wasn't for some "intellectual" or esoteric reasons about his existence and reality. It was, as is probably the case with most so-called "atheists," that I rebelled at the idea of my having to be accountable to any higher power or authority, from whom there is no appeal or escape. Why, how dare God judge ME, of all people! The idea of me seeking for God was akin to the idea of a mouse searching for a cat. I wanted no part of a holy and righteous Creator. But then the grace (unmerited favor) of God sought me out and revealed my abject condition and demonstrated his love toward this wretched man, in that while I was yet a sinner, Christ died for ME. But, one may ask, how does one actually believe? Romans 10:9-10 has the answer: "...that if you shall confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and shall believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you shall be saved, for with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation." BTW, I checked just this morning, and, yep, God is still there. Cheers.
    2
  545. 2
  546. 2
  547. 2
  548. 2
  549. 2
  550. 2
  551. 2
  552. 2
  553. While Mormonism may use traditional Christian terminology in their statement(s) of faith, their actual doctrine is totally NON-Christian. Examples: Mormons believe that the Supreme Deity is not one being but THREE separate beings (Elohim, Jehovah, and Holy Ghost); that God Himself was once a man like we are, but that through faithful obedience to Mormonism (which BTW hadn't been invented yet) became exalted into godhood; that the Heavenly Father has a wife with whom he produces spirit children in heaven to be sent to earth to be born into human families; that faithful Mormon males get to marry multiple wives (in addition to their earthly wife) in heaven to further produce more spirit children; that God/Elohim currently lives as an exalted man with his throne located on a planet named “Kolob” (wherever that may be). Almost reminiscent of George Lucas' famous intro, "...a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away." I could go on and on, but I think that you get the message. Mormonism is NOT a part of Biblical Christianity; in fact, many years ago the Mormons even refused to call themselves Christians, but started doing so in order to attract new (gullible) converts. And Mormonism has NEVER been acknowledged or accepted into the sphere of traditional Christianity by any religious council. Mormonism was invented in 1826 by a treasure-hunting farm boy named Joseph Smith, Jr., who patterned his new "religion" after the cult of Free Masonry, of which he was a member. Smith also engaged in occult practices, such as divining rods, magic circles, sacrifice of animals, and witchcraft. Please check out these things for yourself--don't just take my word for it.
    2
  554. 2
  555. 2
  556. 2
  557. 2
  558. 2
  559. 2
  560. 2
  561. 2
  562. 2
  563. 2
  564. 2
  565. 2
  566. 2
  567. 2
  568. 2
  569. 2
  570. Wrong, wrong, oh, so VERY wrong. The first Klan was founded in Pulaski, Tennessee, on December 24, 1865, by six former Confederate cavalry officers: Frank McCord, Richard Reed, John Lester, John Kennedy, J. Calvin Jones, and James Crowe. Col. Nathan Bedford Forrest was NOT a founding member of this version of the KKK, as many suppose, but he did join and become an early member sometime in late 1866 or early 1867. Organized in numerous independent chapters across the Southern United States, the first Klan was suppressed by federal law enforcement officers around 1871. In 1915, the second Klan was founded atop Stone Mountain, Georgia, by William Joseph Simmons. While Simmons relied on documents from the original Klan and memories of some surviving elders, the revived Klan was based significantly on the wildly popular 1915 film "The Birth of a Nation." From September 1923 there were two Ku Klux Klan organizations: the one founded by Simmons and led by Hiram Wesley Evans, with its strength primarily in the southern United States, and a breakaway group led by Grand Dragon D. C. Stephenson based in Evansville, Indiana with its membership primarily in the mid-western United States. Both groups finally faded away in the 1940's. The third Klan was started by numerous independent local groups opposing the civil rights movement and desegregation, especially in the 1950's and 1960's. During this period, they often forged alliances with Southern police departments, as in Birmingham, Alabama; or with governors' offices, as with George Wallace of Alabama. Several members of Klan groups were convicted of murder in the deaths of civil rights workers in Mississippi in 1964, and of children in the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham in 1963. The existence of modern Klan groups has been (fortunately) in a state of consistent decline, due to a variety of factors: from the American public's negative distaste of the group's image, platform and history, infiltration and prosecution by law enforcement, civil lawsuit forfeitures, and the radical right-wing's perception of the Klan as outdated and unfashionable. Estimates of total nationwide membership range from 3,000 to 8,000. The sooner it drops to "0" the better for all of us.
    2
  571. 2
  572. 2
  573. 2
  574. 2
  575. 2
  576. 2
  577. 2
  578. 2
  579. 2
  580. 2
  581. 2
  582. 2
  583. 2
  584. 2
  585. 2
  586. 2
  587. 2
  588. 2
  589. 2
  590. 2
  591. 2
  592. 2
  593. 2
  594. 2
  595. 2
  596. 2
  597. 2
  598. 2
  599. 2
  600. 2
  601. 2
  602. 2
  603. 2
  604. 2
  605. 2
  606. 2
  607. 2
  608. 2
  609. 2
  610. 2
  611. 2
  612. 2
  613. 2
  614. 2
  615. 2
  616. 2
  617. 2
  618. 2
  619. 2
  620. 2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. 2
  642. 2
  643. 2
  644. 2
  645. 2
  646. 2
  647. 2
  648. 2
  649. 2
  650. 2
  651. 2
  652. 2
  653. 2
  654. 2
  655. 2
  656. 2
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669. 2
  670. 2
  671. 2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674. 2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. The federal Firearm Owners’ Protection Act, or FOPA, allows you to legally transport your firearms in your vehicle while you drive, so long as you comply with a short list of requirements found in what is known as the “Safe Passage” provision, or 18 U.S.C. § 926A. There are three conditions you must meet when crossing state Lines with your personal firearms: (if you are active duty military, other rules may apply) 1) The first condition is that any firearms or guns you are transporting must be unloaded and locked in the trunk of the vehicle or in another container that is out of reach or not immediately accessible. Any ammunition must also be locked in the trunk or another container. This does not include the glove box or center console. 2) Second, your journey must begin and end in states where your possession of firearms is legal. So, for example, if you begin your journey in your home state of Texas and are looking to drive to Grandma’s house in Kansas, where permit-less concealed carry is legal, you will be protected as long as you meet the other two conditions. However, if you begin your journey in Texas and are driving to New Jersey for vacation, where a state-issued license is required to even own a firearm, you will not be protected under the Safe Passage provision. 3) Lastly, you must be “traveling.” This applies especially while going through a state that is not firearm-friendly. Unfortunately, the term “traveling” is not defined in federal law. Courts have interpreted it narrowly to indicate that a person must not stop in one place for “too long.” Unfortunately, how long is “too long” is not entirely clear. In an actual case decided in 2013, a man was convicted for illegal possession of his shotguns and rifles secured in zippered cases after he stopped for a brief nap in New Jersey while moving from Maine to Texas. (P.S.: NJ sucks!)
    2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. Ancient alchemists practiced (unsuccessfully) the occult art of transmutation, i.e., attempting to convert or transmute base metals, such as lead, into noble metals like gold or silver. The technical term for this practice is chrysopoeia (from Greek χρυσοποιία, khrusopoiia, "gold-making"). These attempts went on from Zosimus of Panopolis (c. 300 A.D.) to distinguished chemist Robert Boyle (1627–1691). Hopefully, modern scientists won’t take as long to recognize the futility of these “fusion” experiments. I hate to impugn anyone’s motives, but the question arises as to whether or not they keep making these “breakthrough” pronouncements as a stratagem to ensure the continued flow of funding. I’m no scientist, but it’s my understanding that nuclear fusion in our sun requires a temperature of at least 100 million degrees Celsius in order to allow the ions to overcome the Coulomb barrier and fuse together. In a solar fusion reaction, two light nuclei merge to form a single heavier nucleus. The process releases energy because the total mass of the resulting single nucleus is less than the mass of the two original nuclei. The leftover mass becomes energy. This process takes place in the core of the Sun as hydrogen is being converted into helium, where enormous gravitational forces, intense pressure and heat fuse hydrogen atoms together, generating helium and energy. So unless earth’s scientists find a way of duplicating said conditions in the sun, PRACTICAL nuclear fusion here on earth remains an ephemeral dream. Or, as The Doctor in Star Trek:Voyager once observed, “Divine intervention is highly unlikely.” Cheers and look on the sunny side of life.
    1
  851. This is the most biased, ill-conceived video on the Ukraine situation I’ve heard recently. The NATO/USA warhawks under the Clinton, GWB, Obama and Biden administrations have been baiting the Russians for over a quarter of a century, even while Yeltsin was President (remember Bosnia/Serbia/Kosovo?) In fact, former Secretary of State James Baker had given assurances to the Soviets (during talks for German reunification) that NATO would not be expanded eastward. The record, from 1991, quotes a German official as telling British and American policymakers, "We had made it clear during the 2+4 negotiations that we would not extend NATO beyond the Elbe (a river in Germany). We could not therefore offer membership of NATO to Poland and the others." But Poland joined NATO in 1999, and eleven other countries were eventually added, bring the current total to 26.  The 2008 Bucharest NATO Summit was a significant turning point for European security. There, it was formally announced that Ukraine and Georgia would eventually become members of the alliance. Then, while in Europe during October 2021, U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin reaffirmed that Ukraine and Georgia may still join NATO. The Russians made it clear that either country's entry into the alliance would cross a red line and Russia would be prepared to use all facets of power, including military intervention, to enforce that red line. So who really is to blame for the current situation in Ukraine? I’m no admirer of either Russia or Vladimir Putin, but it’s clear that NATO’s continued expansion and provocative policies resulted in this catastrophe we now see. The tragedy is that it all could have been avoided, along with the needless loss of hundreds of thousands of lives.
    1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861.  @nikoknightpuppetproduction369  "Make the claim" to what? To land that was never theirs to begin with? As for the supposed Biblical claim, Jewish Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss explains: “Zionism is only around 100 years old. It is the transformation from religion to nationalism, to materialism created by non-religious Jews who hated their religion. The reason why they use the name Israel, the Star of David, hijacking, stealing the identity of Judaism and the Jewish people is in order to gain a legitimacy for their existence that should lead people to say, ‘oh, it is God given to them’ and that they should use fear and intimidate people from speaking out against their actions because they will call those that do anti-Semitic; it couldn’t be anything further from the Truth.” Zionists used two major justifications for occupying Palestine: 1) The Biblical claim of Palestine belonging exclusively to the Jews; 2) The Persecution of the Jews in Europe. The true descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were commanded by G-d to remain in the (gentile) nations to which they had been scattered by divine decree. There will yet be a future regathering of dispersed Israel, not by military or political machinations, but by a sovereign act of HaShem. See Deut. 30:1-6, Isa. 41:8-9, Isa. 43:5-6, and especially Ezek. 28:25-26, which reads: "Thus says the Lord GOD: 'When I have gathered the house of Israel from the peoples among whom they are scattered, and am hallowed in them in the sight of the Gentiles, then they will dwell in their own land which I gave to My servant Jacob. And they will dwell safely there, build houses, and plant vineyards; yes, they will dwell securely, when I execute judgments on all those around them who despise them. Then they shall know that I am the LORD their God.'" I ask you now, is Israel currently dwelling securely in peace? Are they that all-righteous nation of which the scriptures speak? The answer to both of these questions is a resounding NO. In Isaiah 19:24 we read, "In that day Israel will be the third part with Egypt and Assyria (Iraq), a blessing in the midst of the earth." Tell me, has that happened yet? You be the judge. Baruch HaShem!
    1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. All hope abandon, ye that live in California. After having lived in the (not so) Golden State for nearly 40 years, we finally gave up on trying to adapt to the "progressively" worsening conditions. Which? Ever increasing taxes and bonded indebtedness by the left-wing (Democrat) state government; adding more benefits & services for illegals (oops, I mean undocumented immigrants). Governor Gavin (The Nuisance) Newsom is still stuck in the 1970's, knowing only how to increase taxes and the size of government. Although California has the highest corporate, personal, sales and gasoline taxes in the nation, infrastructure is crumbling. But at the same time, the legislature decided to fund the "high-speed rail" train to nowhere pork-barrel project, which ballooned from its original budget of $25 billion to nearly $70 billion, at last count. Air pollution, urban sprawl, homelessness and gang violence are all out of control. Plus, California is simply running out of water sufficient to support a population of nearly 40 million people. We said, "Enough!" and relocated to *******, and have never had any cause to regret our decision. Our adopted home has a much smaller, less intrusive state government, along with modest, reasonable taxes. And the violent crime rate is miniscule compared to CA. People here can still leave their cars unlocked at the local shopping mall--I don't, too many years of living in CA, I guess. Any middle class people that still persist in staying in California deserve what's coming to them.
    1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which established the Federal Reserve System and authorizes it to issue Federal Reserve notes, states that “[Federal Reserve notes] shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank." However, the Act did not explicitly define what "lawful money" meant. Since some currencies that could be used by national banking associations as "lawful money reserves" were not considered legal tender, Congress amended the Federal Reserve Act in 1933 to include all U.S. coins and currency as legal tender for all purposes. The 1933 amendment extended the power of legal tender to all types of money, creating dissension on whether paper money and reserves of the Federal Reserve bank are lawful money. While some argue that Federal Reserve notes are lawful money, others tend to disagree. Since the US Constitution states “no state shall make any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts,” some believe that this is the definition of lawful money and, thus, any payment medium other than gold or silver is not considered lawful money. In effect, the primary meaning of lawful money is legal tender, but a broader interpretation is frequently applied in certain contexts. Because no legal definition of lawful money was ever provided, the term has led to a lot of confusion, primarily in legal aspects. For all intents and purposes, lawful money should mean legal tender but is not always the case. This has caused a lot of confusion for students of law and banking. As a practical matter, no such thing as "lawful money" exists in today's economy. All we have are bank deposits created out of thin air by the Fed and its member banks. Only keep as much money in the bank as you can afford to lose, because, surely, you will eventually lose it all, whether by hyperinflation, or by a collapse of the banking system. Qui aurum tenet, leges facit.
    1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of such people as accept the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Messiah. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate had condemned him to a cross, those who had first come to love him did not cease. He appeared to them spending a third day restored to life, for the prophets of God had foretold these things and a thousand other marvels about him. And the tribe of the Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.” – Josephus, Jewish Antiquities, 18.3.3 §63 A Roman historian named Gaius Suetonius Tranquillas (A.D. 69 - A.D. 122), who was the chief secretary of Emperor Hadrian and who had access to the imperial records, mentions Jesus in a section he wrote concerning the reign of Emperor Claudius. He refers to Christ using the variant spelling of "Chrestus." "Because the Jews at Rome caused continuous disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus, he (Claudius) expelled them from the city" (ibid., chapter entitled "Ancient Historians"). Cornelius Tacitus (AD 55-120) is often called the “greatest historian” of ancient Rome. He authored two large works — the Annals and the Histories. Much of what he wrote is now lost to us. Fortunately, there’s one remaining portion which is of interest to this discussion. The portion describes Nero blaming the Christians for the great fire of Rome (AD 64). It reports: "Therefore, to stop the rumor (that he had started the conflagration), Nero substituted as culprits and punished in the utmost refinements of cruelty, a class of men, loathed for their vices, whom the crowd styled Christians. Christus, the founder of the name, had undergone the death penalty in the reign of Tiberius, by sentence of the procurator Pontius Pilatus, and the pernicious superstition was checked for a moment, only to break out once more, not merely in Judea, the home of the disease, but in the capital itself, where all things horrible or shameful in the world collect and find a vogue." Pliny the Younger (A.D. 61 - A.D. 113), in Letters 10:96, recorded early Christian worship practices including the fact that Christians worshiped Jesus as (a) God and were very ethical, and he includes a reference to the love feast and Lord’s Supper. The Babylonian Talmud (Sanhedrin 43a) confirms Jesus' crucifixion on the eve of Passover and the accusations against Christ of practicing sorcery and encouraging Jewish apostasy. **NOTE: I purposely included references from NON-Christian sources only, sources that would have no vested interest in corroborating the person and life of Jesus of Nazareth. Whatever belief or non-belief people may have concerning Jesus, one option is NOT available to them, that is, to deny his very existence. Cheers.
    1
  947.  @druidriley3163  "Any non-contemporary source" also includes you yourself. What makes your (supposed) assertions valid just because you expound them so vehemently? Many widely accepted ancient texts were authored by "non-contemporary sources." Does that, per se, make them invalid? I think not. Flavius Josephus was born in 37 A.D., and therefore had direct access to eye witnesses who actually coexisted with Jesus of Nazareth, both followers and enemies of Jesus. Josephus witnessed the destruction of Jerusalem and the burning of the Temple by the Roman general Titus Vespasian in 70 A.D., which would make him around 33 years old at the time of this event. Suetonius never claimed that Jesus personally visited Rome--he obviously did not, as Jesus never stepped foot outside of Palestine (except for his being in Egypt as an infant). What Suetonius was referring to was the commotion and controversy between those Jews who were followers of Jesus and those Jews who opposed him. Due to the tumult caused between these two groups, the emperor Claudius commanded that all Jews leave Rome c. 49 A.D. Tacitus being a non-contemporary is also irrelevant, as this citation only concerned the actions of Nero blaming Christians for the great fire at Rome in A.D. 64. He simply referred to the well-known fact that the founder of the Christian sect was a man named Jesus who was crucified by Pontius Pilate in Judea in c. 30-33 A.D. As for the Jews and the Talmud, they are very careful to ensure historical accuracy when it comes to their sacred writings. They were the enemies of Jesus--therefore if they wished to discredit him, it would be far easier just to deny he ever lived, rather than to acknowledge him through their slanderous diatribes. I could go on and on, but I think that your adamant refusal to acknowledge the mere fact that Jesus was a real person who lived in Palestine during the first 33 years of the first century betrays your agenda to deny the existence of Christ at all costs. Believe what you will about the person and life of Jesus of Nazareth--that's your prerogative. But to deny his very existence is not an option open to anyone. Cheers.
    1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. Germany has long had the most restriction-free and consumer-oriented healthcare system in Europe. Patients are allowed to seek almost any type of care they wish whenever they want it. The German system is a multi-payer healthcare system (NOTE: not a single-payer system like U.S. MediCare, or the NHS in the UK), paid for by a combination of statutory health insurance and private health insurance. As of 2009, health insurance is compulsory for the whole population in Germany, no exceptions. But German citizens are free to choose among a combination of public and/or private non-profit "sickness funds" at common rates for all members, and is paid for with joint employer-employee contributions. IOW, the employer and employee each pay 50% of the total premium(s). This is a far cry from the monstrosity system that Bernie Sanders is advocated, which would have bankrupted the USA in short order. The Netherlands and Switzerland have systems very similar to the American Affordable Care Act (ACA), in that health insurance is mandated (and strictly enforced) to all citizens, but insurance is not provided by the government. Citizens are free to purchase insurance through whatever company they choose. Just like the ACA, insurance premiums are partially funded through subsidies provided by the government (through taxes) so that policies are truly affordable for everyone. Then you have a system like Denmark's, which is your typical tax-funded state-run universal health care system. Denmark provides “free” health care to all residents, funded through taxes. But at what price? The Danish health care system is not cheap. According to OECD’s Health Data 2009, Denmark’s health cost per person, public and private, was $3,512. However, Denmark has some of the highest taxes in the world, and as such, the average Dane pays a total amount of 45 percent in income taxes. By contrast, for tax year 2021, the top marginal U.S. rate is 37% (on incomes over $612,000), and very few actually fall into that category. The married filing jointly couples in the U.S. pay a marginal rate of 22% on incomes between $81,050 - $172,750. Essentially, half of what the Danes pay. How many Americans would be willing to double their tax burden in order to mimic the Danish healthcare system? You tell me. Personally, I'd favor the German-style system, as it delivers the most for the least amount of money.
    1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. What is being discussed is the "intermediate state," that is, the human condition between physical death and physical resurrection. Please note that in the Hebrew scriptures, man is referred to as BEING a "living soul," - nephesh - (see Gen. 2:7), not as HAVING a living soul. In Hebrew, the word "ruach" can be translated as both "breath" or "spirit." Consider the following: "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto DUST shalt thou return." (Gen. 3:19) "His (man's) breath (ruach) goeth forth, he returneth to his earth; in that very day his thoughts PERISH." (Psa. 146:4) "For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten." (Eccl. 9:5) "Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit (ruach) shall return unto God who gave it." (Eccl. 12:7) "These things said he: and after that he saith unto them, Our friend Lazarus SLEEPETH; but I go, that I may awake him out of SLEEP." (John 11:11) "Then said Jesus unto them plainly, Lazarus is dead." (John 11:14) So we see that our Lord Jesus described the condition of his deceased friend Lazarus as being "asleep." In the book of Daniel the prophet, it is written, "And many of them that SLEEP in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt." (Dan. 12:2) Our Lord Jesus further explained, "Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which ALL that are in the GRAVES shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of condemnation." (John 5:28-29) So, in summary, it appears that the condition of the dead is one as being "asleep in the graves."
    1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. As for the supposed Biblical claim (for zionism), Jewish Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss explains: “Zionism is only around 100 years old. It is the transformation from religion to nationalism, to materialism created by non-religious Jews who hated their religion. The reason why they use the name Israel, the Star of David, hijacking, stealing the identity of Judaism and the Jewish people is in order to gain a legitimacy for their existence that should lead people to say, ‘oh, it is God given to them’ and that they should use fear and intimidate people from speaking out against their actions because they will call those that do anti-Semitic; it couldn’t be anything further from the Truth.” Zionists used two major justifications for occupying Palestine: 1) The Biblical claim of Palestine belonging exclusively to the Jews; 2) The Persecution of the Jews in Europe. The true descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were commanded by G-d to remain in the (gentile) nations to which they had been scattered by divine decree. There will yet be a future regathering of dispersed Israel, not by military or political machinations, but by a sovereign act of HaShem. See Deut. 30:1-6, Isa. 41:8-9, Isa. 43:5-6, and especially Ezek. 28:25-26, which reads: "Thus says the Lord GOD: 'When I have gathered the house of Israel from the peoples among whom they are scattered, and am hallowed in them in the sight of the Gentiles, THEN they will dwell in their own land which I gave to My servant Jacob. And they will dwell safely there, build houses, and plant vineyards; yes, they will dwell securely, when I execute judgments on all those around them who despise them. Then they shall know that I am the LORD their God.'" I ask you now, is Israel currently dwelling securely in peace? Are they that all-righteous nation of which the scriptures speak? The answer to both of these questions is a resounding NO. In Isaiah 19:24 we read, "In that day Israel will be the third part with Egypt and Assyria (Iraq), a blessing in the midst of the earth." Has that happened yet? The answer is obvious.
    1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129.  @philmabarak5421  Property values, historically, increase/decrease as a function of the desirability (or lack thereof) of the particular location. Remember the old adage, "Location, location, location."? Here in Idaho at least, property values for SFH have soared in recent years due to the dramatic influx of out-of-staters, mostly from CA, OR and WA, although for some unknown reason, I've been noticing a lot of Texas license plates lately here in southwest Idaho. (**SFH = Single Family Homes) More to the point, over the past 10 years there has been a 250% increase in population for Ada County, accompanied by a 260% increase in housing prices for SFH, almost a perfect direct positive correlation. As for the reason why people have been moving into this area, one can only speculate that they perceive it to be more livable and more affordable than their previous location(s). People appear to be fleeing from high COL, high taxes, high crime, and non-responsive state government(s). And this cuts across demographic issues and political ideologies. Ten years ago, someone from the Bay area or southern California could have sold their home for $750k and purchased a comparable one here in Ada county for around $150k, leaving them with $600k to invest, or put into the bank as savings, or to buy real estate for rental income (which many did). Hence, the dramatic increase in rental prices for this area. As near as I can determine, newcomers over the past 10 years from the states mentioned above are pretty much an equal mix of (D) and (R), and this is reflected in the current voter registration figures for Ada county, which show 50% (R), 46% (D), and the remaining 4% (myself included) as independent/other. Hope this clarifies some of the concerns you expressed. And remember, what goes up also comes down, especially real estate prices. Cheers.
    1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. Mars has a significantly weaker gravitational pull compared to Earth. The average gravitational acceleration on Mars is approximately 3.72076 m/s², which is about 38% of Earth's gravity, meaning a person who weighs 100 kg on Earth would weigh only about 38 kg on Mars. This means that, if Mars were actually colonized, those people born there would probably never be able to leave or visit Earth. Also Mars, unlike Earth, lacks a significant magnetic field, since heat preservation caused by the molten silicate layer may have rendered the Martian core unable to generate the convective motions necessary for magnetic field creation. The absence of a protective magnetic field had profound implications for Mars. Without this shield, the planet became susceptible to solar winds, as well as high energy cosmic rays. As a result, Mars eventually lost its surface water and, with it, any capability for sustaining life as we understand it. Any future colonists would be forced to spend their lives either underground or in elaborate surface structures designed to protect them from radiation. Last of all, there is the problem of the massive storms on Mars, which in some cases could grow to global proportions. Martian dust storms are common, especially during southern hemisphere spring and summer, when the planet is closest to the Sun. As the atmosphere warms, winds generated by larger contrasts in surface temperature at different locations mobilize dust particles the size of individual talcum powder grains. Carbon dioxide frozen on the winter polar cap evaporates, thickening the atmosphere and increasing the surface pressure. This enhances the process by helping suspend the dust particles in the air. In some cases, the dust clouds reach up to 40 miles (60 kilometers) or more in elevation. This fine dust is extremely damaging, both to humans and sensitive electronic equipment. If Mars ever did have any intelligent life (doubtful), the inhabitants were probably forced to evacuate long ago as their planet's environment became increasingly hostile, Cheers.
    1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. So-called "capitalism" and so-called "communism" are but two opposite sides of the same rotten coin, which is why each philosophy uses the other to define itself. In its present form, capitalism (as opposed to entrepreneurial free enterprise) promotes the consolidation of economic assets and power into the hands of a small, powerful, private oligarchy. Whereas communism promotes the consolidation of the aforementioned assets and power into the hands of an elitist State oligarchy, such as existed in the former USSR from 1917-1991. Do a search on the term "nomenklatura" for further proof. Same dance, different players, same end results. Do not suppose that the so-called "capitalist" giants of the 20th century were at all opposed to Soviet communism. Quite the contrary. Henry Ford, for example, had a very cordial (and profitable) relationship with Soviet dictator Josef Stalin. Monopolists, whether capitalist or communist, think alike and coexist with one another quite amiably. Thomas Jefferson's view on the economy of the new United States was that the federal economy should be kept "rigorously frugal and simple." He envisioned the states being able to run their own economies with minimal interference from Washington policy makers, and he opposed the establishment of a central bank. A far cry from today's warfare/welfare system that is the modern USA. Gen. Robert E. Lee echoed Jefferson's sentiments many years later: “The consolidation of the States into one vast empire, sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home, will be the certain precursor of ruin which has overwhelmed all that preceded it.”
    1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. All hope abandon, ye that live in California. After having lived in the (not so) Golden State for nearly 40 years, we finally gave up on trying to adapt to the "progressively" worsening conditions. Which? Ever increasing taxes and bonded indebtedness by the left-wing (Democrat) state government; adding more benefits & services for illegals (oops, I mean undocumented immigrants). Governor Gavin (The Nuisance) Newsom--Nancy Pelosi's great nephew through marriage--is back living in the 1970's, knowing only how to increase taxes and the size of government. Although California has the highest corporate, personal, sales and gasoline taxes in the nation, infrastructure is crumbling. But at the same time, the legislature decided to fund the "high-speed rail" train to nowhere pork-barrel project, which ballooned from its original budget of $25 billion to nearly $70 billion, at last count. They finally gave up and suspended the entire hair brained project. Air pollution, urban sprawl, homelessness, crime and gang violence are all out of control. We said, "Enough!" 10 years ago, and relocated to *********, and have never had any cause to regret our decision. Our adopted home has a much smaller, less intrusive state government, along with modest, reasonable taxes. And the violent crime rate is minuscule compared to CA. People here can still leave their cars unlocked at the local shopping mall--I don't, too many years of living in CA, I guess. Any middle class people that still persist in staying in California deserve what's coming to them.
    1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. As for the supposed Biblical claim (by Zionists), Jewish Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss explains: “Zionism is only around 100 years old. It is the transformation from religion to nationalism, to materialism created by non-religious Jews who hated their religion. The reason why they use the name Israel, the Star of David, hijacking, stealing the identity of Judaism and the Jewish people is in order to gain a legitimacy for their existence that should lead people to say, ‘oh, it is God given to them’ and that they should use fear and intimidate people from speaking out against their actions because they will call those that do anti-Semitic; it couldn’t be anything further from the Truth.” Zionists used two major justifications for occupying Palestine: 1) The Biblical claim of Palestine belonging exclusively to the Jews; 2) The Persecution of the Jews in Europe. The true descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were commanded by G-d to remain in the (Gentile) nations to which they had been scattered by divine decree. There will yet be a future regathering of dispersed Israel, not by military or political machinations, but by a sovereign act of HaShem. See Deut. 30:1-6, Isa. 41:8-9, Isa. 43:5-6, and especially Ezek. 28:25-26, which reads: "Thus says the Lord GOD: 'When I have gathered the house of Israel from the peoples among whom they are scattered, and am hallowed in them in the sight of the Gentiles, then they will dwell in their own land which I gave to My servant Jacob. And they will dwell safely there, build houses, and plant vineyards; yes, they will dwell securely, when I execute judgments on all those around them who despise them. Then they shall know that I am the LORD their God.'" I ask you now, is Israel currently dwelling securely in peace? Are they that all-righteous nation of which the scriptures speak? The answer to both of these questions is a resounding NO. In Isaiah 19:24 we read, "In that day Israel will be the third part with Egypt and Assyria (Iraq), a blessing in the midst of the earth." Has that happened yet? The answer is obvious.
    1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500.  @willbass2869  I guess that when some people run out of intelligent things to say, they resort to insults and obloquy. There is a veil over your mind, just as Paul said, “But if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, among whom the god of this age (Satan) has blinded the minds of those who do not believe so they would not see the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God.” (2Cor.4:3-4) **Addendum: FYI, I don't take myself seriously, but I do take God and His word of truth VERY seriously--and so should you, friend. And I'm not embarrassed or ashamed of the Gospel, for it is the power of God unto salvation for everyone who believes, to the Jew (chronologically) first, and also to the Gentile (later). As for my being "simple-minded," as you put it, I would rather be wise in what is good, and simple concerning evil. FYI, Paul actually DID meet the risen Christ on the road to Damascus, to which city Paul was sent by the High Priest (at Jerusalem) in order to arrest and imprison those Jews who called upon the Name of Jesus. If you care to investigate further, the entire account is related in Acts 9:1-19. And, to correct your misstatement, it was Luke the physician, not Paul, who wrote most of the N.T. Luke wrote the Gospel of Luke (obviously), and also the book of Acts later on. So Luke's writings account for more than 50% of the N.T. scriptures in total volume. Like most scoffers and skeptics, you are grossly ignorant of the very things you criticize and deride. And I'm not "crazy," most excellent Will Bass, but speak the words of truth and reason. Cheers.
    1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. The term "conservatives" (in the UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, and Germany for that matter) has a VERY different reality than does the same word in the USA. In the former nations, it merely indicates political groups only slightly less left-of-center than Labour or Socialists. There's really very little "conservative" about them. In the USA, the meaning of conservatism is different from the way the word is used elsewhere. Following the American Revolution, Americans rejected the core ideals of European conservatism, which were based on landed nobility, hereditary monarchy, established churches, and powerful armies. American conservatism is a broad system of political beliefs in the United States, which is characterized by respect for American traditions, support for Judaeo-Christian values, economic liberalism, anti-communism, and a defense of Western culture. Liberty within the bounds of conformity to conservatism is a core value, with a particular emphasis on strengthening the free market, limiting the size and scope of government, and opposing high taxes as well as government or labor union encroachment on the entrepreneur. The Tea Party movement, founded in 2009, proved a large outlet for populist American conservative ideas. Their stated goals included rigorous adherence to the US constitution, lower taxes, and opposition to a growing role for the federal government in health care. Electorally, it was considered a key force in Republicans reclaiming control of the US House of Representatives in 2010 mid-term elections. Long-term shifts in conservative thinking following the election of Donald Trump have been described as a "new fusionism" of traditional conservative ideology and populist themes. These have resulted in shifts towards greater support for national conservatism, protectionism, cultural conservatism, a more realistic, non-interventionist foreign policy, a repudiation of Neo-conservatism, reduced efforts to roll back entitlement programs, and a disdain for traditional checks and balances.
    1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. Unfortunately, right out of the box you misstate what the scriptures teach about Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus is called “the Christ (Messiah), the son of G-d, NEVER G-d the Son. The latter title is an unfortunate carryover from romanism and a departure from sound doctrine that occurred during the 4th century CE, when the so-called “trinity” doctrine was foisted upon Christianity. Jesus himself never claimed to be G-d or equal to G-d. (John 14:28b) For those people too lazy to study the scriptures, I could point to John 20:31, John 14:28, John 17:3, Matt. 3:17, Luke 9:35, Acts 9:20, Gal. 4:6, etc. In both the O.T. And N.T., Jesus is referred to as the “Memra” or the “Logos,” or "The Word," in the sense of the creative or directive word or speech of G-d manifesting His power in the world of matter or mind. The Apostle John was not a Greek nor was he a Sophist philosopher. He was a Hebrew, a follower of the true G-d, the miraculous G-d, and an apostle of the messiah, Yeshua. He understood the term “logos” to mean so much more than an impersonal term for logic and order in the universe. But translating into different languages can remove meaning from the original as the translator seeks to come up with terms as close to the original context of the work but that is also familiar with his readers as well. In Hebraic tradition, from the time of Abraham and onward, the term “Word” was understood as the mysterious manifestations of G-d that would come into the world in order to bring the Kingdom/reign of G-d. See 1 Cor. 1 :24 for an example”…Christ, the power of G-d, and the wisdom of G-d.” Our Messiah, Yeshua, the “wisdom of G-d,” the one that was with Him before creation, came to us in the form of a man, lived with us in the flesh, and once crucified and risen again, inhabits every believer. “There is one G-d, and one mediator between G-d and men, the man Christ Jesus.” (1Tim. 2:5) Maranatha.
    1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. As for the supposed Biblical claim (made by Zionists), Jewish Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss explains: “Zionism is only around 100 years old. It is the transformation from religion to nationalism, to materialism created by non-religious Jews who hated their religion. The reason why they use the name Israel, the Star of David, hijacking, stealing the identity of Judaism and the Jewish people is in order to gain a legitimacy for their existence that should lead people to say, ‘oh, it is God given to them’ and that they should use fear and intimidate people from speaking out against their actions because they will call those that do anti-Semitic; it couldn’t be anything further from the Truth.” Zionists used two major justifications for occupying Palestine: 1) The Biblical claim of Palestine belonging exclusively to the Jews; 2) The Persecution of the Jews in Europe. The true descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were commanded by G-d to remain in the (Gentile) nations to which they had been scattered by divine decree. There will yet be a future regathering of dispersed Israel, not by military or political machinations, but by a sovereign act of HaShem. See Deut. 30:1-6, Isa. 41:8-9, Isa. 43:5-6, and especially Ezek. 28:25-26, which reads: "Thus says the Lord GOD: 'When I have gathered the house of Israel from the peoples among whom they are scattered, and am hallowed in them in the sight of the Gentiles, then they will dwell in their own land which I gave to My servant Jacob. And they will dwell safely there, build houses, and plant vineyards; yes, they will dwell securely, when I execute judgments on all those around them who despise them. Then they shall know that I am the LORD their God.'" I ask you now, is Israel currently dwelling securely in peace? Are they that all-righteous nation of which the Scriptures speak? The answer to both of these questions is a resounding NO. In Isaiah 19:24 we read, "In that day Israel will be the third part with Egypt and Assyria (Iraq), a blessing in the midst of the earth." Has that happened yet? The answer is obvious.
    1
  1654. 1
  1655. While Mormonism may use traditional Christian terminology in their statement(s) of faith, their actual doctrine is totally NON-Christian. Examples: Mormons believe that the Supreme Deity is not one being but THREE separate beings (Elohim, Jehovah, and Holy Ghost); that God Himself was once a man like we are, but that through faithful obedience to Mormonism (which BTW hadn't been invented yet) became exalted into godhood; that the Heavenly Father has a wife with whom he produces spirit children in heaven to be sent to earth to be born into human families; that faithful Mormon males get to marry multiple wives (in addition to their earthly wife) in heaven to further produce more spirit children; that God/Elohim currently lives as an exalted man with his throne located on a planet named “Kolob” (wherever that may be). Almost reminiscent of George Lucas' famous intro, "...a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away." I could go on and on, but I think that you get the message. Mormonism is NOT a part of Biblical Christianity; in fact, for many years the Mormons even refused to call themselves Christians, but started doing so in order to attract new (gullible) converts. And Mormonism has NEVER been acknowledged or accepted into the sphere of traditional Christianity by any religious council. Mormonism was invented in 1826 by a treasure-hunting farm boy named Joseph Smith, Jr., who patterned his new "religion" after the cult of Free Masonry, of which he was a member. Please check out these things for yourself--don't just take my word for it.
    1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. @Amused Derision Where does one begin? 🙄 Let's back up and define our terms. The word(s) "anarchism/anarchist" are derived from the Greek terms "an"(without) and "archōn" (leader or ruler). Hence, without rulers or leadership. Anarchism is a political philosophy and movement that is sceptical of authority and rejects all involuntary, coercive forms of hierarchy. Anarchism calls for the abolition of the state, which it holds to be unnecessary, undesirable, and harmful. As a historically left-wing movement, placed on the farthest left of the political spectrum, it is usually described alongside communalism and libertarian Marxism as the libertarian wing (libertarian socialism) of the socialist movement, and has a strong historical association with anti-capitalism and socialism. The only problem with this line of reasoning is that, like Marxism, it looks forward to the gradual withering away of the State. But this is patently unachievable, since anarchism produces only chaos, which the people find intolerable, and wishing to end chaos, they inevitably move toward organized government of various flavors. People, by nature, are inclined to be social creatures, which in turn gravitates toward some form of structured society, i.e., civil government. As an aside, this is why we never saw the emergence of the "new Soviet man" in the USSR. They tried mightily for nearly 75 years years to produce such a creature, but failed. Why, you may ask? Because the flaw in their ideology premised that you could build a perfect Marxist society composed of imperfect people. They were unable to change basic human nature enough to accomplish their goals. That would be akin to trying to build a skyscraper on a foundation of clay. Also, I must point out that you are factually and historically inaccurate when you described the colonies being "in a state of anarchism." Far from it. The Pilgrims and their successors were Englishmen loyal to the Crown (until 1776), and believed first of all in the Laws of God, as well as the laws of the Crown. There is a huge difference between anarchism and freedom in the form of libertarianism. I know, since I've been a libertarian for most of my adult life and never even considered your alternative as remotely feasible or desirable. Believe what you will, but you will find anarchism taking effect when pigs learn to fly and camels learn to sing. Cheers.
    1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. Christmas makes money--money makes Christmas. Simple as that. The vilest sinner in town will run you over with his car as he hurries off to do his Christmas "shopping," or to attend a drunken Christmas "party." Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them. The world would have nothing to do with so-called "Christmas" if they truly believed it marked the birth of our Lord and Savior Christ Jesus. Rev. 10:11 reads, "And they that dwell upon the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send GIFTS one to another; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelt on the earth." Even during the tribulation period, the unbelievers will observe a "christmastime" of hell. More to the point, our Lord Jesus, if he had wished for his birth date to be observed, would have given us instructions as to exactly how and when to do so. He did not. However, he DID instruct us to observe the Lord's Supper "in remembrance of me." The only two ordinances that Christ left us (the Church) with are water baptism and the memorial (Lord's) supper. That's it! Moreover, biblical scholars are divided as to exactly what time of year our Lord was born. Some say early spring; other argue for early fall. One point they agree upon was that the birth of Jesus did NOT take place in late December. Personally, I lean toward the mid to late September timing. The shepherds' flocks would have still been in the field at that time of year, but by December they would have been sheltered indoors in the sheep fold due to the inclement winter weather prevalent in Palestine. Remember that Bethlehem is over 2500 feet (775 meters) in elevation. Regardless of which time of year he came into this world, we have a Savior, "who is Christ, the Lord." Let us rejoice in that truth. Amen.
    1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. Capitalism and Communism are two sides of the same coin, taking opposite approaches to the same end goal--enslavement of the masses for the benefit of the elites/oligarchs. Hence, in a sense, Communism is an extreme form of Capitalism, where a very small group of people (a plutocracy known as the “Central Committee”) effectively owns everything. In the case of the USSR, it was the "nomenklatura," a category of people within the Soviet Union and other Eastern Bloc countries who held various key administrative positions in the bureaucracy, running all spheres of those countries' activity: government, industry, agriculture, education, etc., whose positions were granted only with approval by the communist party of each country or region. Virtually all members of the nomenklatura were members of a Communist party. Individuals with a nomenklatura background have continued to dominate economic and political life in Russia since the end of the Cold War. According to one 2022 estimate, 60% of elites in the Vladimir Putin regime had nomenklatura backgrounds. For the most extreme example, think North Korea. It is Communist de jure. De facto, it is the most Capitalist state in the world, where one private individual owns all the property. Conversely, Capitalism as an economic system characterized by freedom of the market with increasing concentration of private and corporate ownership, while the vast majority of the populace is dependent on the rich for their own sustenance. In THEORY, Capitalism should be the opposite of Socialism. After all, it is based on the forces of a free market for its success. The reality, however, is that the private sector ends up owning everything and the little guy must be contented to catch the crumbs that drop from the abundance of the table of the rich. If we look at the history of the labor versus management, it becomes obvious that the contention is never a fair encounter. Today, especially, the bargaining table is heavily weighted in favor of the employer thanks to Ronald Reagan, the great communicator. In retrospect, I wonder with whom he communicated; certainly not with working men and women. A perfect example is what happened at Hostess Bakery back in 2012. That outfit fired 18,000 workers nationwide at a time in which our country needed to create jobs, not eliminate them. We’re going back to slavery; in a different form, perhaps, but slavery nonetheless. I wonder how many millions its CEO and other company officials received in severance pay and perks? Time for "we the people" to rise up and throw off the yoke of the elites!
    1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. All hope abandon, ye that live in California. After having lived in the (not so) Golden State for nearly 40 years, we finally gave up on trying to adapt to the "progressively" worsening conditions. Which? Ever increasing taxes and bonded indebtedness by the left-wing (Democrat) state government; adding more benefits & services for illegals (oops, I mean undocumented immigrants). Governor Gavin (The Nuisance) Newsom--Nancy Pelosi's great nephew through marriage--is back living in the 1970's, knowing only how to increase taxes and the size of government. Although California has the highest corporate, personal, sales and gasoline taxes in the nation, infrastructure is crumbling. But at the same time, the legislature decided to fund the "high-speed rail" train to nowhere pork-barrel project, which ballooned from its original budget of $25 billion to nearly $70 billion, at last count. They finally gave up and suspended the entire hair-brained project. Air pollution, urban sprawl, homelessness, crime and gang violence are all out of control. We said, "Enough!" and relocated to *******, and have never had any cause to regret our decision. Our adopted home has a much smaller, less intrusive state government, along with modest, reasonable taxes. And the violent crime rate is minuscule compared to CA. People here can still leave their cars unlocked at the local shopping mall--I don't, too many years of living in CA, I guess. Any middle class people that still persist in staying in California deserve what's coming to them. To all of you Californians (especially you SoCal and Bay Area folks)) who continue to p$ss and moan about the deplorable conditions in your area(s), think on this: it was YOU that voted (and continue to vote) for the very politicians responsible for the decline in livability. And to those pogues among you that are thinking of relocating to Montana, Idaho or Wyoming—you’re not welcome in these states. You defecated in your own bed—now live in it.
    1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. Habeas corpus, from Medieval Latin, lit. 'let you have the body'; in law: "[we, a Court, command] that you have the body [of the detainee brought before us]") is a recourse in law through which a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment to a court and request that the court order the custodian of the person, usually a prison official, to bring the prisoner to court, to determine whether the detention is lawful. The United States inherited habeas corpus from the English common law. In England, the writ was issued in the name of the monarch. When the original thirteen American colonies declared independence, and became a republic based on popular sovereignty, any person, in the name of the people, acquired authority to initiate such writs. The U.S. Constitution specifically includes the habeas procedure in the Suspension Clause (Clause 2), located in Article One, Section 9. This states that "The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it". Of course, nowadays, the government itself gets to define the terms contained in the clause, especially what determines "public safety." Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses Grant suspended habeas corpus during the Civil War and Reconstruction for some places or types of cases. In the Confederacy, Jefferson Davis also suspended habeas corpus and imposed martial law. During World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt suspended habeas corpus. Following the September 11 attacks, President George W. Bush attempted to place Guantanamo Bay detainees outside of the jurisdiction of habeas corpus, but the Supreme Court of the United States overturned this action in Boumediene v. Bush.
    1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. As for the Jews' supposed Biblical claim, Jewish Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss explains: “Zionism is only around 100 years old. It is the transformation from religion to nationalism, to materialism created by non-religious Jews who hated their religion. The reason why they use the name Israel, the Star of David, hijacking, stealing the identity of Judaism and the Jewish people is in order to gain a legitimacy for their existence that should lead people to say, ‘oh, it is God given to them’ and that they should use fear and intimidate people from speaking out against their actions because they will call those that do anti-Semitic; it couldn’t be anything further from the Truth.” Zionists used two major justifications for occupying Palestine: 1) The Biblical claim of Palestine belonging exclusively to the Jews; 2) The Persecution of the Jews in Europe. The true descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were commanded by G-d to remain in the (gentile) nations to which they had been scattered by divine decree. There will yet be a future regathering of dispersed Israel, not by military or political machinations, but by a sovereign act of HaShem. See Deut. 30:1-6, Isa. 41:8-9, Isa. 43:5-6, and especially Ezek. 28:25-26, which reads: "Thus says the Lord GOD: 'When I have gathered the house of Israel from the peoples among whom they are scattered, and am hallowed in them in the sight of the Gentiles, then they will dwell in their own land which I gave to My servant Jacob. And they will dwell safely there, build houses, and plant vineyards; yes, they will dwell securely, when I execute judgments on all those around them who despise them. Then they shall know that I am the LORD their God.'" I ask you now, is Israel currently dwelling securely in peace? Are they that all-righteous nation of which the scriptures speak? The answer to both of these questions is a resounding NO. In Isaiah 19:24 we read, "In that day Israel will be the third part with Egypt and Assyria (Iraq), a blessing in the midst of the earth." Has that happened yet? The answer is obvious.
    1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850.  @dnickaroo3574  Palmerston was a British nationalist; he said that the country had no permanent allies, only permanent interests. As such, he may have encouraged liberalism in those countries which were perceived as natural enemies of the British crown, but he never supported liberalism in Great Britain. His thought was that liberalism, if made to flourish in countries such as Russia, France and Austria (all enemies of GB), would tend to weaken those nations, and thus serve to strengthen British foreign objectives. The Reform Bills of 1831 and 1832 were more considerable than Palmerston liked, and he tried to modify them. Failing, he blamed “the stupid old Tory party” for making them necessary by refusing minor concessions, emphasized the “final” nature of the 1832 Act, and proclaimed his confidence that the landed interest would continue to prevail in politics as he thought it should. From 1849 to 1865 he came to personify the opposition of the landsmen and many of the middle classes to the enfranchisement of trade unionists and to resist fiscal and legislative assaults on landed property, opining (with regard to Ireland) that “tenant right was landlord’s wrong.” Lord Palmerston, who became prime minister for the first time in 1855, stood out as the dominant political personality of mid-Victorian Britain precisely because he was opposed to dramatic change and because he knew through long experience how to maneuver politics within the half-reformed constitution. Doesn't sound like much of a "liberal" to me.
    1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. All hope abandon, ye that live in California. After having lived in the (not so) Golden State for nearly 40 years, we finally gave up on trying to adapt to the "progressively" worsening conditions. Which? Ever increasing taxes and bonded indebtedness by the left-wing (Democrat) state government; adding more benefits & services for illegals (oops, I mean undocumented immigrants). Governor Gavin (The Nuisance) Newsom--Nancy Pelosi's great nephew through marriage--is still living in the 1970's, knowing only how to increase taxes and the size of government. Although California has the highest corporate, personal, sales and gasoline taxes in the nation, infrastructure is crumbling. The roads are in deplorable condition, especially in the Bay area. On a recent visit to family, there were so many large cracks, dips and potholes, that I was actually concerned about damage to my car's suspension. But at the same time, the legislature decided to fund the "high-speed rail" train (to nowhere) pork-barrel project, which ballooned from its original budget of $25 billion to nearly $70 billion, at last count. They finally gave up and suspended the whole hairbrained project. Air pollution, urban sprawl and gang violence are all out of control. We said, "Enough!" and relocated to *******, and have never had any cause to regret our decision. Our adopted home has a much smaller, less intrusive state government, along with modest, reasonable taxes, and, for the most part, excellent infrastructure. And the violent crime rate is miniscule compared to CA. People here can still leave their cars unlocked at the local shopping mall--I don't, too many years of living in CA, I guess. Any middle class people that still persist in staying in California deserve what's coming to them. No pity on them whatsoever.
    1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944.  @mati261000  You are woefully misinformed regarding so-called "eternal consequences" and the topic of "hell" in general. First of all, there is no such thing as "your soul getting zapped." The soul has no continuing or separate existence from the entire person. We do not possess a soul, we ARE living souls. See Genesis 2:7, where it reads, "And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man BECAME a living soul." Man is composed of the natural elements found in the earth, and, when God provides breath/spirit (Heb., nᵉshâmâh), he BECOMES a living soul (Heb., nephesh). We differ from the animal kingdom in that mankind possess a rational intellect (after the image and likeness of God), with which we can relate to ourselves and to our Creator. Don't know about you, but I've never have noticed my dog pausing before his meal to return thanks to God before eating. 🐕 We do NOT continue existence after death as some kind of disembodied spirit or ghost. If we did, then the spiritists and necromancers might have a valid point. The condition of the departed dead is one of being "asleep in the dust of the earth" (Daniel 12:2). See also John 11:11, where our Lord Jesus states, "Our friend Lazarus sleepeth; but I go, that I may awake him out of sleep." And also John 11:14, "Then said Jesus unto them plainly, Lazarus is dead." Also Psalm 146:4, "His breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth; in that very day his thoughts perish." And the "wrongdoings," as you call them, can only be propitiated (atoned for) by the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, shedding his blood for the remission (forgiveness) of ALL of our sins. "...and without the shedding of blood, there is no remission. (Heb. 9:22). The future for all unbelieving humans is eternal judgement in the lake of fire (Rev. 20:15), which is the final GeHenna (Matt. 23:33). BTW, what's in YOUR future?
    1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1