Comments by "Stuart Brown" (@stuartbrown8259) on "URGENT This Is A Dirty Election Trick‼️👀" video.

  1. No in simple terms. Your only input when voting is for a candidate in your local area. Beyond that, for example, we never get the opportunity to vote directly who we would like to be the prime minister. Whoever just happens to be the leader of the party that gets the most seats throughout the country, becomes the prime minister. That's also assuming the leader of the party wins his seat. There is no national vote as such, it simply boils down to whichever party gets the most seats, regardless of the number of votes for the party nationwide.
    2
  2.  @noexcuse6704  Hopefully he will win, think positive. However, I understand what you mean though, as perhaps if they don't win then it's considered a wasted vote. There is a bigger picture at stake here. I'm giving examples. Say Reform in total get 5 million votes nationwide, but only turns into 10 seats in parliament? Then as another example the Tories or Lib Dems get the same amount of votes nationwide, yet between them they get a few hundred seats? That proves that our voting system is not fit for purpose. We have a first past the post system, which is not right. There was an election years ago, I think it was UKIP, forerunners of Reform, they got something like 5 million votes nationwide, but only 1 seat in parliament. That is not right, and shouldn't be like that. Hope I've explained to you how our system works, it's all designed to favour the established parties not the newer or smaller ones.
    1