General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Louis Rossmann
comments
Comments by "" (@MamaMOB) on "Louis rips Adobe to shreds over their garbage response, because they deserve it" video.
I'm educated in graphic design. When they became a subscription service I figured they were going to go out of business. I didn't think anyone would be stupid enough to pay every single month for software. Why the hell would I want my software to be a service? I don't want you to change the software I've grown accustomed to. I want it to stay the way that it is. Because that's how I know how to use it. In my opinion this is our fault. We should have driven them out of business when they decided we had to keep paying for their software, not a service.
38
And it should hold up in court. I mean EULAs do.
4
We've had the internet for at least 30 years now. Why have none of our politicians ever done anything to regulate what companies can do to us using it? I mean they sure wanted to regulate us but why didn't they regulate corporations. Something they actually had control over since they don't actually own the internet. The only way this will go away is if someone who's important enough sues because they have an NDA. Since Adobe claims that they own anything imported into their software, not a service, they claim they own everything with an NDA. They do not. And if I'm not mistaken government agencies use Adobe suite. And I guarantee this is not just for Photoshop. I bet you have to sign this for Excel too! 4:30 They claim they have never taken ownership of a customer's work... That's literally what this does. Takes ownership of EVERYTHING your customer puts into your software, not a service. 5:59 that sentence sounds like what they're saying is we've never done this behavior in the past so who cares that we're asking you for permission to do it in the future. First off I don't believe they've never done it in the past. Second off just because you haven't done something to me before doesn't mean you won't do it now that you've told me you will. The past is only a good predictor of the future when a person hasn't told you what they're going to do in the future. Like you give us permission to do whatever we want with whatever you put into our software, not a service. 7:26 this is just preparation for theater. They will find a couple of people who have very very mild complaints, fix something to make them happy, and then use them to prove that everybody's happy now! Even though they didn't change anything about their software, not a service. Last thing. Photoshop and AI are the antithesis of each other. They are the opposite of the spectrum. One is creative software one is software so you don't have to create. Why the hell would anyone want AI in their creative software? They're the one trying to be creative they don't want the computer to be creative.
1
And it literally always has been! Even when I was in graphic design school in 2003.
1
Literally any corporation. Any business that has you sign a TOS. They all do it. EULAs do not care about the customer. They are there to protect the business and sell you. A EULA turns you into the product.
1
Why were you paying a monthly fee for software? Adobe is not now nor has it ever been a service. Why were you so stupid you gave them money every single month of the year for software you should have been able to adjust straight up purchase? You're why they did this. Your stupidity is why they thought they could push this.
1
EULAs are a gun to the customers head with no reprisal. The government has just decided that companies are allowed to threaten their customers for acceptance of a supposed contract. I don't know how we consider these things contracts. I don't get a say in it. A contract is supposed to be a two-way street. EULAs are not! They should 100% be illegal!
1