Comments by "Anonymous" (@Anonymous------) on "iChongqing" channel.

China invented some of the most advanced military equipments at their time, such as explosives and crossbow, both of these were used successfully by the Mongols to conquer Europe. Today China is a manufacturing power house, as it is getting back into innovative inventions, the huge demand for advanced military equipments by many militarily weak nations that have been under the military threats from USA, this is when China is stepping in, to create and supply military equipments for those nations that need to protect themselves against the world bully.
12
Can't wait to watch some people's meetings with Alex in it, but I hope not a bunch of foreign alcoholic expats's request to open more bars. 😂
11
I am two steps beyond, I drink cocofftea, that is a hot drink made with coco powder, coffee and tea, best of the best!
4
Yes, Cyrus is now back in China.
2
 @9064peterpan And said he would rather go work for China. 😂
2
@iChongqing Why some people there weren't wearing mask?
2
In China different races and ethnicities live in peace and harmony, while in USA different races and ethnicities are killing one another. A good dictatorship is better than a bad fake democracy.
2
China is not making and selling military equipments for the purpose of use in invasion but for self defence. China keeps the higher level military equipment for itself in case others use these equipment to launch invasion of others.
2
You are wrong, think again.
1
@jaydee6268 The CEO of Ford says he's been driving a Xiaomi EV for the past 6 months and doesn't want to give it up Ford CEO Jim Farley says he's been driving the Chinese tech giant Xiaomi's EV for the past six months. Farley described Xiaomi as an "industry juggernaut." Farley previously told a board member that China's auto industry was an "existential threat." Ford CEO Jim Farley says he doesn't want to give up the Xiaomi Speed Ultra 7 he's been driving for the past half year. "I don't like talking about the competition so much, but I drive the Xiaomi," Farley said while speaking to the British presenter Robert Llewellyn on "The Fully Charged Podcast." The podcast, which Llewellyn hosts, aired on Monday. "We flew one from Shanghai to Chicago, and I've been driving it for six months now, and I don't want to give it up," Farley continued. The SU7 is Xiaomi's maiden electric vehicle. The Chinese tech giant produces three versions of the car: SU7, SU7 Pro, and SU7 Max. Farley didn't specify which version he was driving. "It's fantastic. They sell 10,000, 20,000 a month. They're sold out for six months," Farley said of Xiaomi's success with the SU7 earlier in the interview. "You know, that is an industry juggernaut and a consumer brand that is much stronger than car companies," he added.
1
It was the British colonizers who increased India's GDP, and it was the British not Indians who gained the wealth. The British East India Company made England rich by exploiting the poor Indians and using the lands in India. The British kept detailed records of their productions and exports, this is how we know it's a fact, but there is no reliable historical record of productions by India itself so the claim that before British colonial era India was a rich nation with high GDP is only as believable as Indian fairy tales. China on the other hand has reliable records of their productions and exports, even without seeing any record we all know it's a fact that China exported tea, porcelain, silk and many more to other parts of the world especially to Europe. It was Chinese exports to England that drained much of England's wealth.
1
@AXS512 Not true. India was rich in what? China was raking in all the wealth England had by exporting to it, but what did India export except a bit of cheap spices. There are many false claims that India had the world's highest GDP but no one can show any evidence. China doesn't have to make any false claims like India does because the evidence is so obvious.
1
@AXS512 The British also colonized Tibet, many parts of Asia, Africa...so by your logic all those places were rich, that was why the British went there. Your myth doesn't stand a chance.
1
@AXS512 So according to your logic the British also didn't colonize India. Just because the British extract the natural resources from a country it doesn't mean that country is rich. Now you admit it was the British who produced the GDP in India by taking its natural resources, and that didn't make India rich though.
1
If you're a good person then PRC is for you, but if you're not then it's not.😂
1
 @allsportsexpert Please edit your comments, I like to see actual unedited video as if walking around there in person. 😊
1