Comments by "Wandrative" (@Wandrative) on "Cleo Abram"
channel.
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shadowrylander
The object exists because the beauty of it exists. Beauty comes first, not the object. Interaction is merely a consciousness recognizing the existence of its beauty in its own intellect.
You have given utilitarian examples of why certain things are considered beautiful. But this reward benefit idea is basically the same as calling AI the same thing as a human intellect (which is not because it is existentially different in its nature), because the AI is trained via positively rewarding it when it gets certain things 'right'. Because the art world have already succumbed to this type of relativism its getting destroyed, (unlike the math world where the AI was technologically able to replace first and foremost, but have still been safeguarded).
Beauty is not something that makes you feel good through observation. It is about understanding what is aesthetically right. If what you say is true then when humans degenerate their visual intellect (due to AI and those who value nothing about art abusing it in the future), nothing matters and nothing is lost, because those souls cant recognize the beauty so nothing is lost. Even more, its best for all of us to disappear and the most simplest mind who is happy about everything should remain for the universe to exist in a 'beautiful nature'. SO all artists die and cultured people who with higher visual intellect should die for the universe to become beautiful. For my drastic example, I have seen 'artists' that hung live fish in sealed pockets to watch them suffer and die, which they wrongly perceived as beautiful. If everyone else disappears, that becomes beauty? Beauty is more then a mere psychological phenomenon. Although there are variations of beauty, that does not mean that beauty doesn't exist in essence..
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1