Comments by "Bo McGillacutty" (@Mrbfgray) on "Al Gore goes on 'unhinged' climate change rant" video.

Nobel Prize for predicting end of Artic sea ice by a decade ago, 2 decades later ice is as much as it was then.
16
@megaluckydog1212 OLD trite response--have you seen Obama's Hawaiian 'mansion'? It's right on the F'n beach, at least one of Al Gore's luxury homes isn't much higher. But I'm a strong swimmer so no problemo.
5
@seanworkman431 Of course. Yet Gore won the now tainted (for other reasons as well) Nobel Prize for exactly that. History deniers, aka., climate alarmists tend to say weather isn't climate but then blame every 'extreme weather event', hot or cold or whatever, as another indicator of anthropocentric climate change.
2
@jamesmorrow1646 The science says CO2 is doing far more to green the planet than warm it. My organic food jungle gardens thrive. History deniers often pretend data starts in 1984, the coolest time in the last 80 yrs. Take a look at the last 2.5M yrs for some actual context. Here's a few fun facts derived from the IPCC from few yrs ago: "Humans have had no detectable impact on hurricanes over the last century." (true for extreme weather events in general) "Greenland's ice sheet isn't shrinking any more rapidly today then 80 yrs ago." "The net economic impact of human induced climate change will be minimal though at least the end of this century." (big implications there) How many of us have actually read the IPCC reports? For what they are worth...they are selectively deceptively referenced by Establishment Media. CO2 not trivial but also not the driver of climate, a bit player. Easy enough to prove that much. (ask me) So why haven't you seen anything in the news about that?? Bc drama and fear sells, reality does not. (((source for above quotes: Steven E. Koonin's book; "Unsettled?" science adviser for Obama)))
1
@seanworkman431 OK. It fluctuates enough to say it's roughly the same I believe.
1