Comments by "Bo McGillacutty" (@Mrbfgray) on "Munro Live" channel.

  1. 56
  2. 46
  3. 46
  4. 40
  5. 30
  6. 22
  7. 22
  8. 22
  9. 21
  10. 19
  11. 18
  12. 17
  13. 16
  14. 15
  15. 15
  16. 14
  17. 13
  18. 13
  19. 12
  20. 11
  21. 11
  22. 11
  23. 10
  24. 10
  25. 10
  26. 10
  27. 9
  28. 8
  29. 8
  30. 8
  31. 8
  32. 7
  33. 7
  34. 7
  35. 7
  36. 7
  37. 7
  38. 6
  39. 6
  40. 6
  41. 6
  42. 6
  43. 6
  44. 6
  45. 5
  46. 5
  47. 5
  48. 5
  49. 5
  50. 5
  51. 5
  52. 5
  53. 5
  54. 5
  55. 5
  56. 5
  57. 5
  58. 5
  59. 5
  60. 4
  61. 4
  62. 4
  63. 4
  64. 4
  65. 4
  66. 4
  67. 4
  68. 4
  69. 4
  70. 4
  71. 4
  72. 4
  73. 4
  74. 4
  75. 3
  76. 3
  77. 3
  78. 3
  79. 3
  80. 3
  81. 3
  82. 3
  83. 3
  84. 3
  85. 3
  86. 3
  87. 3
  88. 3
  89. 3
  90. 3
  91. 3
  92. 3
  93. 3
  94. 3
  95. 3
  96. 3
  97. 3
  98. 3
  99. 3
  100. 3
  101. 3
  102. 3
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113.  @timepstein274  You expect the EPA to protect you??? Not until YOU demand specific action from them first! Our institutions are so corrupt it's shameful, scary. Our environment is loaded with toxins, better count on yourself to mitigate it. Methane is a non issue, completely fabricated BS propaganda from Establishment Media Mafia that has never ever given a flying F about science or reality in general. It only lasts about 15 yrs in the atmosphere, that's like a second in geologic time, geology being the origin of climate science. Then it becomes plant fertilizer. Until very recently the USA had the "American Serengeti" with several million buffalo 'blackening the landscape' until geocoding the Natives nearly made them extinct. That's comparable to current cattle numbers. Avoiding feeding them grain, corn mainly, also has significant benefits across the board. While "factory farms" and cheap beef are a problem, many ranchers improve the landscape via keeping herbivores moving over wide areas. The simplistic notion that BEEF IS BAD is typical of the irrational, ill-informed Leftists. (yes the Right has it's analogs too) Frankly, veganism is unhealthy. Properly managed livestock is not only beneficial to the land but healthy to consume and if a modest premium was had for byproducts like leather--that's a good thing to promote responsible production and land management. Tesla for one, claims to responsibly source such as cobalt, leather can be even more responsibly purchased.
    2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. 2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. 2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258.  @andrewmeehan6151  They won't need much fixing other than crashes which will trend toward zero with autonomous. That's one of the big advantages over ICE but also why legacy MFGs and the archaic dealership biz models will struggle. I don't need to look up anything, they sell everything they can build. The "Busted growth story." and "The competition is coming." are half decade old standing jokes. Not a bubble for TSLA tho it is for others in the space who haven't even delivered a solitary vehicle. I understand well why you and others think that, just like 60 Minutes back in 2002 speaking with a confident Amazon executive: "Amazon is worth 20% more than Sears !??!" (stated with all due incredulity) It took me near a decade to get my head around Tesla, it's one of the hardest to grasp and that's why it's such a massive opportunity, you might see it by say 2025 and that's fine, it will STILL BE A BUY by then. I'd bet you a friendly $100 that TSLA is double by Aug 2022, no telling on such short time frames naturally, but a 10X in 5 to 10yrs all but in the bag. The CCP is a big risk for the China market but that will be diluted with more and more factories everywhere else. (assuming they don't build several new factories in China, which if not punished by the evil regeme, would make sense) Don't forget the forces against them from fossil fuels to the entire establishment of services, dealers, OEMs, plus most media as Tesla is the only one who doesn't pay the bribe, they don't advertise whereas GM, F and the rest squander some $2B annually to pay off corporate media and convince silly customers to buy their products.
    1
  259. 1
  260.  @andrewmeehan6151  You are looking backwards, things are changing fast. Norway has about the highest adoption level on Earth and it's not warm there half the yr, yes they pay a 30% winter range penalty vs say a 10% for an ICE? Seems OK with them. How often do they go over 250 miles at a stretch anyway? Stop to pee and get a coffee or snack and you'll have another 200 miles in the 'tank'. Very soon a 25 to $30k Tesla will be available and it will be a far better drive than anything in that price range and instead of paying $30 or $40 to fill it up it will be 8 or $12. Combine that with no oil changes, no transmission, minimal servicing of any kind and it will absolutely be the poor man's choice once those hit the used market at half the purchase price. Charge time for better brands is roughly 30/40 min for another 300 miles at a Supercharger, going to 15 minutes a few yrs out. Right now charging at home is a problem for most apartment dwellers but that's an easy fix, just some slow chargers in the parking areas, it will become very standard bc it's cheap small footprint way to expand the potential customer base and much more useful than the swimming pool or gym they probably offer already. Many businesses already offer free charging, chargers will be along curbs, workplace parking, etc. Toyota is dragging it's feet and going to be in a bad place by the time they accept the inevitable, they'll have no competitive software capability nor battery capacity and Chinese, Euro and American brands will be eating their lunch. Toy. has done well with the vastly more complex hybrids but they are horrible to drive if you've experienced a fun car and they will soon be more expensive in everyway. DOOMED. BIG respect for frugality and utilitarian, but I'll be damned if I'd ever own a Prius and suffer it daily...if I can afford a choice. Often overlooked that Teslas are the safest cars ever made which is a priority for many and at least a consideration for any sane person....I expect other OEMs will close the safety gap fairly fast, not so much for electronics, software, motor, battery, overall design efficiency and performance, even mfg efficiency. We take for granted over the air updates for Tesla but who else can even do THAT well by now?
    1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265.  @rolandrauenhorst2002  LA today is pristine compared to my introduction from RURAL isolated USA in 1968. lol "Do we want to run this experiment?" Anyone can understand that compelling case. However--we are running this experiment even if we managed to keep CO2 at 280ppm where industrialization started. There is nothing magical about 280 vs, say 600 where I think we are heading. What IS the ideal CO2 level? I sure ain't zero as that's the end of literally everything that matters. 280 is LT historically very low and arbitrary unless you believe this planet was made for us, or even life in general. That's just mindless religion. Deforestation is an argument for more atmospheric CO2 not less, plants thrive on far higher levels and recent glacial minimum CO2 levels have come dangerously close to mass plant extinction. We have greened the planet with more CO2. High value agriculture greenhouses like to inject 2000ppm CO2 often, they'd use 4000 if not for diminishing returns, plants love it, ppl, pollinators, etc., don't notice it. Have a tight energy efficient home?...it's probably 2000 plus and doesn't matter. Last 2.5M yrs climate has been horrible with repeated bulldozing of entire 3rd of N. Hemisphere over and over, highly unstable. A geologic blink of eye ago, 12.5kya, Younger Dryass saw 12 deg C swings in a matter of decades, bad shit. Talk about deforestation, try glaciation. Human caused habitat loss is a separate issue and a big one, nothing means much more than Madagascar lemures, whales...pick your fave. Not to suggest 600ppm will prevent the pending glacial max, no one knows bc climate models simply don't work. Probably NOT prevent. But it will marginally reduce the risk and intensity and certainly benefiting crop yields TODAY, reducing water requirements and fertilizing plant life globally. (Jeeeze--get me started, HA!)
    1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1