Comments by "Bo McGillacutty" (@Mrbfgray) on "US Government: 'Gold mine' with 200 years of hydrogen discovered underground" video.

  1. Order of magnitude more since horizontal drilling and fracking tech revolution. (more than prior to mid/late 2000's) Apparently many massive similar shale formations all over Earth.
    1
  2.  @imfloridano5448  Interesting idea, sounds likely under assumptions-- can't be oil, or liquid alone, has to be compressible something, gas on top of oil, and there needs to be significant friction for gas compression to dissipate energy, not just a spring but damper too. Those requirements seem typical in real life. Even if real may not be 'significant', IDK. (ignoring the sources of said waves)
    1
  3. What if used as NatGas is today, for heating and cooking, peaker plants, don't remove the methane just burn both together. If it's 10% methane 88% H2, would eco-warriors claim victory? They should. (realizing some complications, steel pipe hydrogen embrittlement?? Leakage, diff combustion characteristics....) Process as described should very gradually increase atmospheric O2, assuming oxygen makes it to surface, H2 will find a way out and then mostly leave Earth entirely, leaving less water and more O2. By us burning it there's no net change in water or O2, just a cycle.
    1