General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

dr1flush
The Young Turks
comments

Comments by "dr1flush" (@dr1flush) on "U.S. House OVERWHELMINGLY Votes To Ban TikTok #TYT" video.

@eavesdropper0 Jonathan Greenblatt, head of the Anti-Defamation League, can be heard saying, “We have a TikTok problem,” referencing declining public support for Israel among younger people. The progressive group RootsAction also noted that AIPAC is the top donor to Congressmember Mike Gallagher, who authored the TikTok ban bill.
2
@eavesdropper0 The Anti Defamation League (ADL) CEO was speaking about the difficulty the colonialists face in controlling the narrative for young people. Greenblatt suggested that the warmongers had been wrongly focusing on left-wingers who sympathise with Palestine: “Cause again like we’ve been chasing this left/ right divide. It’s the wrong game. The real game is the next generation.”
2
AIPAC controls the country.
1
@eavesdropper0 do you really think this has anything to do with China and user data collection? If that was the case why not regulate that across all apps?
1
@eavesdropper0 ummm why wouldn’t you regulate all user data collection if that was actually the issue or concern? There’s thousands of Chinese owned apps and there’s 12,000+ apps on play store alone that read your sms. Tens of thousands of apps collect user data, Facebook, YouTube, instagram and basically every app you can think of is collecting data.
1
@eavesdropper0 zhang yiming is the owner and yes he’s Chinese lol. TikTok is a subsidiary of bytedance which isn’t owned by the ccp.
1
@eavesdropper0 the claim is that at any time ccp could demand user information from bytedance. This is ridiculous accusation however , it’s a private company!!! No foreign company is safe if that is the case.
1
@eavesdropper0 the reality of this ban has nothing to do with China or user data collection. That’s the scapegoat and it’s blatantly obvious. Why wouldn’t you regulate user data collection if it was a national security concern? Because it’s not. And what exactly is the threat of data collection?
1
@eavesdropper0 the truth is this has nothing to do with user data and EVERYTHING to do with influence. User data collection is NOT a national security issue . How exactly do you think it is?
1
@eavesdropper0 adl and aipac are both doing the same thing. Trying to control Israeli sentiment and western propaganda
1
@eavesdropper0 ADL and AIPAC both are heavily invested in controlling western propaganda and sentiment of Zionism
1
@eavesdropper0 AIPAC and ADL. are heavily invested in western propaganda and main purpose is to advocate for a pro is real ideology. After all we give them 3.3 billion a year and fund their entire weapons program
1
@eavesdropper0 AIPAC and ADL are both heavily involved in western politics and propaganda. Go listen to the leaked phone call from Greenblatt
1
@eavesdropper0 I’m having a problem with comments getting deleted… go figure. But all I’d say is go listen to greenblatts leaked phone call
1
@eavesdropper0 China is a scapegoat. Just connect the dots . You can find greens leaked phone call online . Also why else do you think these people/ companies invest into politics?
1
@eavesdropper0 main donor. That means the majority of his donations come from aipac and he wrote the bill to ban TikTok . Connect the fots
1
@eavesdropper0 it’s simple really. I’m your MAIN source of donations and vaguely say I won’t endorse you unless you support my cause . Why do you think corporations and organizations give money to politicians?
1
@eavesdropper0 i didn’t say espionage” little bro “ . Espionage is defined as spying using spies to collect political and military information. So do you think TikTok is collecting military and political information? How so? I clearly said explain how the collection of user data is a national security concern and if so why not actually regulate that? If an app collecting user data info is espionage like you claim then why is only TikTok the focus? All apps do this , YouTube , facebook, instagram basically all websites etc collect user data information. To summarize … Why not bring forward laws to actually regulate and control user data collection if it is in fact a national security threat ? And how is TikTok spying on military and political information?
1
@eavesdropper0 its not owned by china that’s a lie. The owner is Chinese, that is the correct statement.
1
@eavesdropper0 Zhang Yiming is the owner of TikTok so I don’t understand why you say China owns TikTok when it’s a private company. That is a lie that it is owned by China
1
@eavesdropper0 espionage is spying to collect political and or military information. So how is TikTok collecting classified information or political /military info? Elaborate please
1
@eavesdropper0 how is an app collecting data state sponsored espionage? Basically all Corporations collect data , you accept that in the terms of services. If corporations collecting user data was a national security concern then why not regulate that? THEY ARE ALL DOING IT. It’s obvious there’s a lack of understanding how user data is collected and what that even entails. The concern over TikTok for u.s government is not a national security threat, it is influence over half the population.
1
@eavesdropper0 your concern is that ByteDance could be secretly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party( ccp). And that user databases are collecting information on half the population of USA and using it for what exactly? If you use the app you agree to the platform collecting internet or other network activity information such as your IP address, geolocation-related data, unique device identifiers, browsing and search history (including content you have viewed in the Platform), and Cookies. So how is that state espionage and a national security threat? I doubt an answer to any questions
1
@eavesdropper0 AIPAC,ADL, JFNA and all pro-Israel lobbies have been targeting banning TikTok for pro-Palestinian media and try to pin antisemitism on the app. This is nothing new, they blame the app for youth not believing their lies. US administration is trying to hide realities and control influence with this ban. This has nothing to do with national security that is a scapegoat
1
@eavesdropper0 AIPAC,ADL,JFNA and all pro-Israel lobbies have been targeting banning TikTok for pro-Palestinian media and try to pin antisemitism on the app. This is nothing new, putting blame on the app for youth not believing their lies. US administration is trying to hide realities and control influence with this ban. This has nothing to do with national security that is a scapegoat. (IMO)
1
@eavesdropper0 AIPAC,ADL,JFNA and all pro-is real lobbies have been targeting banning the app for pro-pal media and try to pin anti sem on the app. This is nothing new, putting blame on the app for youth not believing their lies. US administration is trying to hide realities and control influence with this ban. This has nothing to do with national security that is a scapegoat. (IMO)
1
@eavesdropper0 AIPAC,ADL,JFNA and all pro- is real lobbies have been targeting banning the app for pro- Pa media and try to pin anti- sem on the app. The notion of blame on the app for youth not buying into their lies is preposterous. US admin is trying to hide realities and control influence with this ban not protect your user data. This has nothing to do with national security . (IMO)
1
@eavesdropper0 all pro- is real lobbies have been targeting banning the app for pro- Pa media and try to pin anti- sem on the app. The notion of blame on the app for youth not buying into their lies is preposterous. US admin is trying to hide realities and control influence with this ban not protect your user data. This has nothing to do with national security . (IMO)
1
@eavesdropper0 AIPAC,ADL,JFNA and all pro-is lobbies have been targeting banning the app for pro-p media and try to pin anti-s on the app. The notion of blame on the app for youth not buying into their lies is preposterous. US admin is trying to hide realities and control influence with this ban not protect your user data. This has nothing to do with national security . (IMO) If user data was a threat they would be concerned with the collection of ….USER DATA, they aren’t. They don’t care about that
1
AIPAC,ADL,JFNA and all pro-is lobbies have been targeting banning the app for pro-p media and try to pin anti-s on the app. The notion of blame on the app for youth not buying into their lies is preposterous. US admin is trying to hide realities and control influence with this ban not protect your user data. This has nothing to do with national security . (IMO) If user data was a threat they would be concerned with the collection of ….USER DATA, they aren’t. They don’t care about that
1
@eavesdropper0 AIPAC,ADL,JFNA and all pro-Israel lobbies have been targeting banning the app for what they claim is pro-Palestinian media ( aka free speech) and try to pin antisemitism on the app. The idea that the blame is on the app for youth not buying into their lies and propaganda is preposterous. US administration is trying to hide realities and control influence with this ban not protect your user data. This has nothing to do with national security . If user data was a threat they would be concerned with the collection of …. USER DATA ,they aren’t. They don’t care about corporate user data collection
1
@eavesdropper0 just to be clear it is a Chinese company like meta ( Facebook instagram) is an American company , that doesn’t mean USA owns facebook. China does NOT own ByteDance it’s privately owned and there is no concrete evidence that TikTok has ever been used by the Chinese government to spy on its users. There’s plenty of apps from China ,one example is temu which collects user data , sells it to 3rd parties and then profits off said sales. Temu is Chinese company why not ban that? Because it was never about user data collection it was ONLY about influence and propaganda. It’s an attack on the bill of rights and 1st amendment to ban TikTok over propaganda. Not sure why you’re afraid of China
1
@eavesdropper0 just to be clear it is a Chinese company like meta ( Facebook instagram) is an American company , that doesn’t mean USA owns facebook. China does NOT own ByteDance it’s privately owned and there is no concrete evidence that TikTok has ever been used by the Chinese government to spy on its users. There’s plenty of apps from China ,one example is temu which collects user data , sells it to 3rd parties and then profits off said sales. Temu is Chinese company why not ban that? Because it was never about user data collection it was ONLY about influence and propaganda. It’s an attack on the bill of rights and 1st amendment to ban TikTok over propaganda and influence
1
@eavesdropper0 China does NOT own ByteDance it’s privately owned and there is no concrete evidence that TikTok has ever been used to spy on its users. There’s plenty of apps from China ,one example is temu which collects user data , sells it to 3rd parties and then profits off said sales. Temu is Chinese company why not ban that? Because it was never about user data collection it was ONLY about influence and propaganda.
1
@eavesdropper0 not sure why you’re afraid of China
1
@eavesdropper0 China doesn’t own TikTok . 🥱 yawnnnn
1
@eavesdropper0 China isn’t a communist country lmao
1
@eavesdropper0 meta (Facebook instagram)is American company like TikTok is a Chinese company. That doesn’t mean USA owns meta or that China owns TikTok. Temu is a Chinese company that collects user data and sells it to 3rd parties, why isn’t that getting banned? Because it’s not about user data or national security, it’s about influence and’s propaganda
1
@eavesdropper0 meta (face b insta)is American company like TikTok is a Chinese company. That doesn’t mean USA owns meta or that China owns TikTok. Temu is a Chinese company that collects user data and sells it to 3rd parties. why isn’t that getting banned? Because it’s not about user data or national security, it’s about influence and’s propaganda
1
@eavesdropper0 meta is American company like tik is a Chinese company. That doesn’t mean USA owns meta or that China owns tok. Temu is a Chinese company that collects user data and sells it to 3rd parties. why isn’t that getting banned? Because it’s not about user data or national security it’s about influence
1
@eavesdropper0 and in banning apps over influence and propaganda it’s an attack on the 1st amendment. You literally cannot prove there is a national security threat with Tik you just say it. YOUR DATA IS GETTING SOLD BY COMPANIES ON THE REGULAR BECAUSE OF TRUMP. You clearly don’t care about the bill of rights and want an authoritarian state where they shutdown things they don’t like. This is insanity to support and unconstitutional. This is what’s known as FREEDOM and of you don’t like it that’s on you
1
@eavesdropper0 your ignorance is on full display. A country can’t be capitalist and communist, that’s not how that works. One party rule isn’t communism it’s called a dictatorship. Chinese communist party is authoritarian capitalism or state-capitalism. There’s never been a country to establish communism in full. You can’t use a capitalist system under communism , what they have established is state authoritarian capitalism. Governments calling themselves something doesn’t mean that’s what they are. This is all besides the point… Trump made your user data collection a product for sale by corporations . So to argue that user data collection is national security concern makes ZERO sense. Any business can buy collected user data. DO SOME RESEARCH 🤣. China could just buy it . You’re clearly against the 1st amendment. Do you realize that?
1
@eavesdropper0 I don’t want to ban things because they are Chinese. You do. Guess what that phone in your hand is Chinese, that tv you stare at Fox News on is Chinese. If we are just banning things made in China you’re going to have a rough life. If user data is a threat ( IT’S NOT) then why is it being sold? Your argument is REALLY bad and shows how little is understood about this topic and politics in general
1
@eavesdropper0 I don’t want to ban things because they are Chinese. You do. Guess what ?that phone in your hand is Chinese, that tv you stare at Fox News on is Chinese. If we are just banning things made in China you’re going to have a rough life. If user data is a threat ( IT’S NOT) then why is it being sold? Your argument is REALLY bad and shows how little is understood about this topic and politics in general
1
@eavesdropper0 I don’t want to ban things because they are Chinese. You do. Guess what that phone in your hand is Chinese, that tv you stare at is Chinese. If we are just banning things made in China you’re going to have a rough life. If user data is a threat ( IT’S NOT) then why is it being sold? Your argument is REALLY bad and shows how little is understood about this topic and politics in general
1
@eavesdropper0 I don’t want to ban things for being made in China. That’s you.
1
@eavesdropper0 oh wow we can agree. China is a mixed, socialist market economy. They are not communist, I’m glad you understand. None is this has to do with the actual topic. Your user data is being sold because of trump so explain to me logically older bro how this is anything but controlling influence and propaganda. Big bro can you answer any questions?
1
@eavesdropper0 oh wow we can agree. China is a mixed, socialist market economy. They are not communist, I’m glad we can agree on something . None is this has to do with the actual topic. Your user data is being sold because of trump so explain to me logically older bro how this is anything but controlling influence and propaganda. Big bro can you explain ?
1
@eavesdropper0 oh wow we can agree. China is a mixed, socialist market economy. They are not communist, I’m glad we agree . None is this has to do with the actual topic.Our user data is being sold because of trump so explain to me logically big bro how this is anything but controlling influence and propaganda.
1
@eavesdropper0 oh wow we can agree.It is a mixed, socialist market economy. They are not communist, I’m glad we can agree. None is this has to do with the actual topic. All user data is being sold by corps to 3rd parties thanks to trump. Big brother can you explain to me how this is anything but controlling influence and propaganda? Or do you want to ignore my point some more?
1
@eavesdropper0 It is a mixed, socialist market economy. They are not communist, I’m glad we can agree. All of our user data is being sold by companies to 3rd parties thanks to trump. Big bruh can you explain to me how this is anything but controlling influence and propaganda.
1
@eavesdropper0 It is a mixed, socialist market economy. They are not communist, I’m glad we can agree.
1
@eavesdropper0 All of our user data is being sold by companies to 3rd parties thanks to trump. Big bruh can you explain to me how this is anything other than controlling influence and propaganda? Please
1
@eavesdropper0 All of our user data is being sold by companies , China could hypothetically buy it all. Older bro can you explain to me how this is anything other than controlling influence and propaganda?
1
@eavesdropper0 bipartisan support doesn’t equal just or right. You haven’t made an argument that made sense to explain how user data collection is a threat. You’re just afraid of China
1
@eavesdropper0 USA also has bipartisan support to support Israel’s massacre of Gaza . That’s what this is about older bro. You’re just saying things you aren’t making arguments. I’ve explaining why this isn’t about user data and only a goober would think it is.
1
@eavesdropper0 literally just said the 1st amendment has exceptions. That’s all that was said. Yes I understand the exceptions in the 1st that exist . That does NOT justify banning an entire platform. Social media sites are protected from being held accountable for things said on them. The argument comes back to user data collection being a national security concern. It is not otherwise why would Donald .T pass a bill allowing the sale and collection of user data? China can buy all the user data it wants. You can think whatever you want but you’re authoritarian , xenophobic and anti constitutional law for wanting to ban an app because it’s Chinese. The bill being bipartisan is because adl ,aipac and similar organizations saying there’s a problem with the platform.
1
@eavesdropper0 I’m sure in your head you think you proved your argument
1
@eavesdropper0 in reality you’re just pro authoritarianism and anti free press and speech. There’s no proof of a threat to users data and even if there hypothetically was anyone can literally buy your user data because of Donald .T. The argument that it’s to protect user data is preposterous and proves that it’s actually nothing to do with that. They could literally pass bills to protect your data, they passed one to sell it to 3rd parties😆🤣😂
1
@eavesdropper0 I already explained that user data is already collected and sold to anyone because of a bill passed by trump
1
@eavesdropper0 I already explained. User data collection and sales are completely legitimate thanks to Donald.T
1
@eavesdropper0 comments get deleted on this channel. I literally explained it already so I’d just be repeating myself
1
@eavesdropper0 I’ve already explained everything
1
@eavesdropper0 no you didn’t. You say China owns it ( which it doesn’t) You never once addressed what I said about how it’s legal to collect and sell data. You ignore me when I say China could buy your data. I honestly don’t even understand why you think it should be banned besides saying it’s a Chinese company. You ignore when I say it’s solely about influence and propaganda and just go back to China China China. There’s no argument here lol. Go look. You didn’t make an argument you just say things that imply China bad
1
@eavesdropper0 no you didn’t. You say China owns it ( which it doesn’t)
1
@eavesdropper0 You never once addressed what I said about how it’s ALREADY legal to collect and sell data.
1
@eavesdropper0 .You ignore me when I say China could buy your data.
1
@eavesdropper0 I honestly don’t even understand why you think it should be banned besides saying it’s a Chinese company.
1
@eavesdropper0 You ignore when I say it’s solely about influence and propaganda and just go back to China China China.
1
@eavesdropper0 I just get the feeling you’re xenophobic
1
@eavesdropper0 you make no sense at all. China bad is all you say
1
@eavesdropper0 it’s honestly the biggest L to ban apps because you fear China. You’ll see, it won’t get banned
1
@eavesdropper0 nope. It’s not gonna happen because of the constitution. Trump already tried to ban it when he was potus
1
@eavesdropper0 grow a brain
1
@eavesdropper0 “It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person.”
1
@eavesdropper0 I genuinely wonder if you can read. You haven’t exposed any falsehood “bro”. Talking like you won something when you’re just scared of China like someone who’s never left their town
1
@eavesdropper0 but you didn’t. You can’t prove that China is using the app to collect personal information. Is literally just something you say. That’s not debunked
1
@eavesdropper0 even if you could prove the app is controlled by the Chinese gov ( which you haven’t and can’t) I fail to see the relevance of that. If it was actually a national security threat then why can anyone buy your data already. You never debunked one of these points… not once. In fact I doubt you even thought about it
1
@eavesdropper0 there really is no proof China owns the app or has control over it to the point the gov is collecting everyone’s info. You saying they do isn’t debunking anything 😂
1
@eavesdropper0 The simple fact that all companies sell your info already made the argument of data protection being a danger moot .
1
@eavesdropper0 writing off understanding my reasoning and focusing on irrelevant things
1
@eavesdropper0 you’re the one who wants USA to ban apps….. like China does . Ohh the irony .
1
@eavesdropper0 China bans apps all the time… sounds perfect for ya
1
@eavesdropper0 they constantly ban apps there. It’s perfect for you
1
@eavesdropper0 are you stupid?
1
@eavesdropper0 it’s clear you’re like 17 years old
1
@eavesdropper0 no see you’re the one wanting to ban apps. In USA there’s this thing called the constitution. Tok isn’t getting banned kiddo. Xenophob
1
@eavesdropper0 it can still be overruled in court because it is against the constitution to force the sale. The fact they put it in a bill with money for Israel says it all. It’s only about controlling what ya think and clearly ya don’t think for ya self
1
@eavesdropper0 if an American buys the app the hypothetical new owner could sell all data it collects to anyone . It’s hilarious how oblivious people are. You know your phone literally came from China ? Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither
1
@eavesdropper0 if an American buys the app the hypothetical new owner could sell all data it collects to anyone . I don’t like the government banning things without actual evidence. Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither. You deserve neither
1
@eavesdropper0 if it’s sold whoever buys the app can hypothetical sell all data it collects to anyone anyway. I don’t like the government banning things without actual evidence just cuz they say so. If ya want to be a little paranoid lapdog go for it. But those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither. Scarred of an app is pathetic
1
@eavesdropper0 if it’s sold whoever buys the app can hypothetical sell all data it collects to anyone anyway. I don’t like the government banning things without actual evidence just cuz they say so. Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither. Scarred of an app
1
@eavesdropper0 ya didn’t prove anything, ya just say things and make assumptions . I never used the app once in my life lol. That’s the part ya don’t understand is how this isn’t just about a silly app.
1
@eavesdropper0 “those who sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither “
1
@eavesdropper0 who’s the one falling for anything ? If ya stood for the bill of rights ya wouldn’t fall for this nonsense The problem is, the legislation is built on misconceptions about how TikTok operates. There is no proof only assumptions . What’s even more dangerous is it does nothing to protect people's privacy or the manipulation across ALL platforms, including those owned and headquartered in the United States. IF THEY CARED ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY/SECURITY THEY WOULDN’T ALLOW IT TO BE SOLD FOR PROFIT. I genuinely hope some day you wake up to the reality of the government.
1
@eavesdropper0 reflect on those words. Of the two of us which one is falling for fear mongering ?
1
@eavesdropper0 just one time address this question I have… just once please… If your data being collected is a national security concern why is it being sold?
1
@eavesdropper0 I’ll say it again because you refuse to acknowledge my question… ever If data collection is a security risk then why is it legally bought and sold ?
1
@eavesdropper0 it’s sold to anyone. Did you think data is sold to only American companies?
1
@eavesdropper0 United States does not have one single data privacy framework or directive. So again, if data privacy is the concern then why is there zero protection?
1
@eavesdropper0 you’re really good at completely missing the point.
1
@eavesdropper0 actually Mitt Romney recently confirmed what I had always suspected in a interview. That the ban is to control pro Palestinian propaganda. The argument you refuse to address is so simple even a child could understand. If this was actually about data collection prevention/ protection why have they not stopped the buying and selling of our data? It’s really obvious this is all about propaganda unless you’re living with ya head in the dirt .
1
@eavesdropper0 actually M.Romney recently confirmed what I had always suspected in a interview. That the ban is to control pro pal propaganda.
1
@eavesdropper0 i can keep repeating myself. If the ban is to truly protect us from data collection then why is it legal to buy and sell our data? Any foreign gov can buy our data lol. This is such a simple question that you refuse to acknowledge
1
@eavesdropper0 still have yet to acknowledge my reasonable question. Why is data collection purchasing and selling legal if it’s a security risk?
1
@eavesdropper0 senator Romney recently confirmed what I had always suspected anyway.
1
@eavesdropper0 that’s all I’m saying. They are mostly all the same these politicians
1