Comments by "dr1flush" (@dr1flush) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1.  @elijahrivera2858  adolf didn't gain power by being elected like you would in usa. He won in 1932 but he was appointed chancellor "According to the constitution of the Weimar Republic, the chancellor and other cabinet members were appointed by the party, or coalition of parties, that held an absolute majority in the legislature."
    4
  2.  @ab-hx8qe  if you're trying to say fascist are socalist you're wrong.
    4
  3.  @Alte.Kameraden  with all due respect y'all don't understand NxZI and /or socalism if you think they are socalist. Period. You can think you're deep and tik is a genius but he's not, he doesn't get it either and it's simple 101 stuff. It's not complicated adolf is right wing facist. You're really trying to say now adolfs a "lefty" . 🤦
    4
  4.  @Alte.Kameraden  go watch modern day neo NxZI lol. They are at the"unite the right" March in Charlottesville. They are flying NxZI memorabilia and flags at Jan 6 capital riot marching with the right. They are not with LEFTY Y'all really don't get politcal parties . Imo you're getting radicalized careful
    4
  5. 80 years of history, 5 hr video now Hitler's a Marxist 😂😂😂😂 tik you're a JOKE
    4
  6. This is ahistorical and when I give facts they get deleted 🤦
    4
  7.  @danielaramburo7648  NAZI weren't Socialist they purged SOCIALIST. Argument destroyed lol
    4
  8.  @TheImperatorKnight  I love how all you ever say is no, I'm right you're wrong. Here's a link lmao .
    3
  9.  @RobinEvans1234  thanks because i didn't want to watch his 5 hr video and my instincts is this is bs. .I had a feeling this tik guy didn't know what he was taking about on certain topics. How can you call Hitler a Socialist in any meaningful way especially after what they did to democratic socialist and knight of long knives it's preposterous. Hitler's even had speeches saying socialism is something for select Germans so too claim he's a Socialist in a meaningful way is ahistorical.
    3
  10.  @paraguaymike5159  I don't agree with ahistorical opinions ,im not trying to troll. I think a 5 hr video claiming Hitler is a meaningful Socialist is trolling . 5hrs is RIDICULOUS
    3
  11.  @TheImperatorKnight  do you delete comments?
    3
  12.  @TheImperatorKnight  A. H pretty much defines the entirety of leftist ideology as being a J conspiracy that he might fight against. He defines Social Democracy (at the time period , a very vague term that can be applied to Socialism in general) as being headed by J 's who must be fought against. Hence, A.H wants to defeat other forms of Socialists. To claim he's a meaningful socialist is preposterous and ahistorical.
    3
  13.  @TheImperatorKnight  HITLER WAS NOT A SOCIALIST; NAZIS PURGED SOCIALIST 🤦
    3
  14.  @hlkev462    communist said they wanted democracies I'm sure they are liars in your opinion tho. They are commies so they are liars but freaking n*zi tell the truth while they put you in train for gas chamber for holding socalist politcal ALLIANCE!!!! Bravo on this argument .
    3
  15.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743  " What luck for rulers that men do not think ." A.H~
    3
  16.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743  I would reply but it would just be me repeating myself to you and Jren beat me to it.
    3
  17.  @Alte.Kameraden  do any of you understand ALL you're doing is arguing semantics??
    3
  18.  @Alte.Kameraden  thiis comment shows exactly where your confusion is. The definition and beliefs of political parties is hard I know. Spend time reading instead of trying to teach
    3
  19.  @legalfictionnaturalfact3969  haha so funny. My account is flagged I cannot even write his last name without comment being deleted. I cannot write a ton of words. You think I write NxZI for kicks?
    3
  20.  @legalfictionnaturalfact3969  must be nice to be able to actually swear at ppl lol
    3
  21.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743  you're the ones claiming what we learned is lies. Why DON'T YOU provide examples lol? If you read all comments here there are probably like 10 main examples of why he's not a socalist. Funny how tik comes in to comment how his comment is in wrong section lmaooo. Thanks tik for the input lol. ALL I get here is arguing over the definition of politcal parties that's already agreed upon by everyone . Freaking mind numbingly boring and preposterous . There's only one reason y'all do this..... Spite for opposition... You're Not deep you're shallow
    3
  22.  @Alte.Kameraden now that's witty.!!!👌.. The name dr flush I got the from a scientist I find interesting known as dr flush who designed toilets for space exploration ...lol
    3
  23.  @elijahrivera2858  the problem imo is y'all don't understand n@zi party. That or the politcal terms like socalism etc
    3
  24.  @elijahrivera2858  lol. I'm trolling in the sense that don't agree with y'all and will debate any 1.
    3
  25.  @elijahrivera2858  y'all take similarities and ignore core difference. It's impossible to reason with y'all and I know I only radicalize your beliefs when you dig in harder. But that's your fault
    3
  26.  @elijahrivera2858  China?
    3
  27.  @elijahrivera2858  the problem imo is libertarians can't wrap their minds around socalism. That's how I see it
    3
  28.  @elijahrivera2858  the ACTUAL party had majority support. The NxZI PARTY key word PARTY.. Communist/ socalist had around 35/36 % while the n@zi had 38% ( give or take) . Elections didn't take place like in usa, and adolf was appointed which led to him becoming dictator. Had he not been appointed this video would not exist, correct?
    3
  29.  @Alte.Kameraden  you should use the american political compass imo. Just pretend like it's not a flat map but a globe or tube meaning if you go far enough left or right you're basically standing together. You have to use left right terms and we have to all be on same page or we have this problem here!!! Not understanding POLITICAL PARTY'S. Adolf. H is right wing facist on AMERICAN politcal compass. Facism is left or right btw
    3
  30.  @Alte.Kameraden  you're way off NxZI killed Dems . Like I said you REALLY don't understand the NxZI PARTY and I'm quite certain you misunderstanding socalism.
    3
  31.  @elijahrivera2858  socalist want to end Capitalism. why is this so hard for y'all to understand? Adolf did NOTHING to implement socalism long term and capitalist corporations still freaking exist from ww2. Y'all are so freaking lost
    3
  32.  @Alte.Kameraden  I can't get on your level with the "politics is to deep to be labeled right or left" belief. This is why I say none of y'all understand these parties and what their POLICY/ BELIEFS/ AGENDA is about if you can't even recognize the differences between right and left. Try actually learning about right and left for one they are not deep lol.
    3
  33.  @Alte.Kameraden  CLEARLY if you can't tell difference between right and left you can't tell difference between National Socialist and socalism. I can literally spot people on the right and left these days with just a little conversation. It's so freaking easy if you ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND POLITCAL COMPASS
    3
  34.  @Alte.Kameraden  also idk who you're talking about"wilson" . He sounds like a social conservative or Paternalistic conservatism beliefs. LITERALLY already a party for almost all beliefs, your ignorance of the party is the PROBLEM
    3
  35. It's hilarious how imo all y'all who think adolf is a socalist are libertarians 😂
    3
  36.  @Alte.Kameraden  I didn't know who you were taking about because all you said was Wilson. Woodrow was NOT even alive during ww2 so I don't know what you're saying
    3
  37.  @Alte.Kameraden  forgive me but I'm getting fed up with y'all. I'm really sick of listening to libertarians rambling on. Y'all make no points as to why adolfs a socalist. NOT A SINGLE ONE . SIMILAR DEFINITION... " Resembling WITHOUT being identical"..... National Socialism has SIMILARITIES to Socialism but it's not a socalist ideology . Go back to 101
    3
  38. But they won't debate. And tik will literally just say you're wrong I'm right and link you too another of his videos
    3
  39.  @t00bgazer  this is dangerous imo. People are stupid
    3
  40.  @samuelboucher1454  I'm not watching 5hr video . Reichstag fire decree. Enable act of 1933. Night of long knives. . No longer meaningful Socialist, never really were. Why don't you address it if you understand? Because you don't
    3
  41.  @samuelboucher1454  it's preposterous and ahistorical. If I were to express my socalist views and vote against reich you know what happens ??? 💀......once they implemented reichstag fire decree they used it to kill/arrest anyone with socalist views ... All of them.... Not some... Every... Last... One... They then implemented 1933enable act and after night of long knives to say they are socalist is ahistorical.
    3
  42.  @samuelboucher1454  Adolf LITERALLY says socalism is something for select Germans or the select aryan race. THAT'S NOT socalism that's National Socialism !!!!!!!! "Not proletarians of all countries unite, but antisemites of all countries unite!" this is adolfs socalism " Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxists have stolen the term and confused its meaning… We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national ." – Adolf "OUR SOCALISM IS NATIONAL". You cannot Logically call this socalism, it's National Socialism. To say adolfs a socalist is an understatement and ahistorical and really I wonder why you want to say that
    3
  43. 3 arrows destroys this video and so does anyone with 101 knowledge lol
    3
  44. ⚠️ WARNING ⚠️ don't get youtube education The Enabling Act 1933 allowed the Reich government to issue laws without the consent of Germany's parliament, laying the foundation for the complete Nazification of German society. The law was passed on March 23, 1933, and published the following day. On 2 May 1933 , just three months after Adolf Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor of Germany, the SA and police occupied the offices of German Trade Unions, seizing control of them. The Reichstag Fire Decree permitted the regime to arrest and incarcerate political opponents without specific charge, dissolve political organizations, and to suppress publications. It also gave the central government the authority to overrule state and local laws and overthrow state and local governments. Night of long knives Hitler's supremacy confirmed Elimination of the SA as a threat Significant reduction in the regime's opposition . Now does this sound like a meaningful socialist? LOGICALLY? Don't get a YouTube education. Just a ⚠️ WARNING ⚠️
    2
  45. After 1933 to claim they are socalist you have to be ahistorical
    2
  46.  @Ueiksg  how is a dictatorship socalism? I'm not watching 5hr video ,I watched 20 mins and my eyes won't roll back .
    2
  47.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743  the government control over property is hardly socalism. The community controls means of production, distribution, and exchange in socalism
    2
  48.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743 the German gov had full control after the laws were set in place. Full totalitarian control, under socalism the proletariat equally controls means of production exchange and distribution. ADOLF Literally says socalism is something for select Germans. Somewhere along the journey y'all got bad info
    2
  49.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743  no worries. I respect you for being open minded. I could be wrong it's always possible, then I'm sorry. My understanding is from what history taught us. Only 80 years ago, 1 lifetime. My uncle was flight crew and is m.i.a over France ww2. My father fled Paris as very young child , there are people still alive. Tik implys history is wrong it's a very basic statement to just say adolfs a socalist. He's literally a " National Socialist" .
    2
  50.  @a.wadderphiltyr1559  the actions writing and speechs of adolf h are not in line with Socialism. A H says in speechs socialism is something for select Germans , that's the opposite of actual Socialism. Mussolini and Adolf were facist not Socialist in any meaningful way. North korea call themselves Democratic People's Republic of Korea, North korea is NOT democratic or a republic, it's the equivalent of that. The thing is history is already written, your ahistorical opinions on it don't change reality.
    2