Comments by "dr1flush" (@dr1flush) on "New Jan. 6 tape shows 3-hour battle in Capitol tunnel" video.

@BillBrasky368 someone asks for evidence of what you say and you link Russell brand lmfaooooooooooooo. I'm fuqn dying rn lol.
3
@BillBrasky368 you defend domestic terrorists so you're one imo riot definition 1a: a violent public disorder in·sur·rec·tion definition a violent uprising against an authority or government Literally the definition of insurrection. I know words are difficult but there's a book called the dictionary that'll help you in the future
3
@BillBrasky368 and far right fanatics believe anything as long as it fits the narrative lmfao. You literally are spreading lies about ray lol such a putz. A story by conservative blog Revolver News draws speculative conclusions about Ray Epps, a Trump supporter who attended the Jan. 6 riot. Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears To Have Led The Very First 1/6 Attack On The U.S. Capitol,” reads the Oct. 25 headline of a story on Revolver News, a right-leaning website run by a former Trump White House speechwriter.( No that's not biased ,,, ya we are the ones in eco chamber) Other conservative sites cited the report with their own headlines like this one that gained traction on Facebook ( of course you get news from FB): “BOMBSHELL: Did Jan. 6 Riot and Ray Epps EXPOSE a Corrupt FBI?” IN SHORT .....NOPE L O LLLLL
2
@BillBrasky368 it's actually sad how you can't fact check anything but we are the ones in an echo chamber 🤣. Tell me more about how this wasn't an insurrection, they just wanted to get a tour 👍 God I feel bad for you shcmuck s
2
@coloneloftruth9621 what were they trying to do then? Obviously this was an attempt to overturn the election results, you can bull shet me all you want but I'm not gonna buy that crock of sheet.. They marched on the capital and broke in by force to attempt to overturn election results. If that's not a failed insurrection what the fuq is lolll. Y'all are so silly defending this, they just wanted a tour right. Righttttt someone was shot and killed for being a domestic terrorist. It's ok when y'all destroy things but blm antifa bad right. Fuq outta hereeeeee beech. Y'all are such schmucks , merry Christmas
2
@coloneloftruth9621 it's the equivalent of how Mussolini came to power except y'all failed (this time) . The definition of facism and insurrection , reap what you sow
2
@BillBrasky368 dude you're sad ASF if you listen to Charlie 🤣😅😂
2
@BillBrasky368 Russell brand and Charlie Kirk is facts guys😂🤣😂. Everything you said is lies for the most part. You're brainwashed big time by the fanatical far right and holistic healer lol. Keep trolling on Xmas troll
2
@BillBrasky368 the facts are youre defending domestic terrorists attempts to overturn election results by force, the definition of a insurrection. You're in line with Mussolini if this is what you want or defend, you're a facist. Nothing new from the right. Now link some more morons that support your ideology and act like that is reasonable response 😂. Preposterous and uneducated, I don't have time for imbeciles. Best of luck on your political journey lol
2
@coloneloftruth9621 October 28, 1922, Benito Mussolini's Blackshirts infamously March on Rome, seizing total control over the Italian government. The March on Rome marked the beginning of Fascist rule over Italy, ending all social-liberal parliamentary regimes.
1
@coloneloftruth9621 the entire goal was to overturn election results correct? That. Is. The. Definition. Of. Insurrection. Just because they aren't charged doesn't mean sheet lol. You can't even deny they wanted to overturn results , they just failed
1
@coloneloftruth9621 proud boys are inline with black shirts ( "stand back and stand by") only weaker .The intention was to overthrow democracy and rule by facism just like Mussolini and the blk shirts successful did. Because they failed you can say Durr that was NOTHING lol. But I'm not a putz . If you don't learn from history you'll repeat it. If they got what they wanted they would've changed the election results .. PERIOD
1
@coloneloftruth9621 so how can you say that was not an attempted insurrection? Knowing the definition of insurrection is" a usually violent attempt to take control of a government". Learn what words mean and we don't have to play semantics
1
@coloneloftruth9621 I know what you're implying lol. And you just write off the Mussolini comparison so you're not deep kiddo. For you to make a valid point law would have to ALWAYS be 100% correct . The only reason they aren't getting those charges is because they would have to charge Donald Trump
1
@coloneloftruth9621 I have one question for you. Would you say what happened January 6 was open resistance against established authority or governmental restraint? Because that's an insurrection guy. So kick rocks
1
@coloneloftruth9621 im perfectly fine. I know when I'm dealing with a DENIALIST and you're asking questions you know the answer to. Why?
1
@coloneloftruth9621 it's irrelevant that they aren't charged with an insurrection. That was clearly an attempted insurrection and only an imbecile or fake hack would say otherwise. You wanna play semantics all day like a moron have at it
1
@coloneloftruth9621 I just said it's irrelevant that they aren't charged with an insurrection. I guess I have to make it clear for you. They aren't charged with an insurrection . We both knew this already but you're trying to make your point. Apparently law is never incorrect and it has nothing to do with POTUS and half the gov .
1
@coloneloftruth9621 now like I was saying. That was an attempted insurrection similar to that of Mussolini gain of power ( the founding father of fascism ) and the black shirts.
1
@coloneloftruth9621 only right wing biased denialists defend this lol. You're not deep, you're shallow and smell like low tide
1
@coloneloftruth9621 your argument that this wasn't a insurrection ( which I know is your only point) is semantics.. yes. Bye bye you have nothing else to say
1
@coloneloftruth9621 what is it with you right wing fanatics? You can't even face reality anymore typical right wing YouTube denialist. I guess when you live in a fantasy bubble of right wing propaganda
1
@coloneloftruth9621 ha according to the founding fathers that was treasonous . Treason is defined in the US constitution as “levying war” against the United States, or “adhering” to the enemies of the United States and “giving them aid and comfort”. “men gathering with guns, forming an army, and marching on the seat of government” . Get over yourself YOU'RE defending this lol what a joke.
1
@coloneloftruth9621 there is no sedition charges so they never wanted to overturn election results right. They only constructed a gallows to get Mike pence to do his job and swear Biden in right?My god man do you hear yourself defending this ? I already knew they didn't get sedition charges . That was STILL the definition of an insurrection you can't even deny it. Saying they didn't get charged with insurrection didn't means that wasn't an attempted insurrection.
1
@coloneloftruth9621 you are a narcissist smooth brainer who thinks he's educating ppl when you're just brainwashed . I already answered your question. If that wasn't sedition idk what is. Just because the courts haven't charged them with that doesn't change the reality of what they did. I guess you think oj Simpson is innocent also because the courts say so. Kick rocks you're a broken record and have no valid argument against this being an attempted insurrection.
1
@coloneloftruth9621 where's evidence of voter fraud occurring on mass scale? But you believe that
1
@coloneloftruth9621 courts throw out every case against this mass election fraud but you still think it happened lol.
1
@coloneloftruth9621 BTW THERE IS 31 CONSPIRACY CHARGES JACK ARSE
1
@coloneloftruth9621 just the other day proud boys member pleads guilty to conspiracy lol. You're really trying so hard to defend your facist comrades huh
1
@coloneloftruth9621 jan 6 was an uprising against the government ( literally the definition of an insurrection lol)with attempts to overturn election results by intimidation and any means possible. I can't speak for the law system and why exactly they aren't charged with sedition but I suspect conspiracy is equivalent. Your repetitive and one sided argument is that of a juvenile conservative boy. I'm done. Good luck on your political journey
1
@gopissoff you actually believe they weren't trying to overturn election results by making vice president pence not do his job? You're the putzs . It's all dandy as long as the criminals have the same ideology as me right?
1
@gopissoff that was an attempted insurrection and only biased denialist would disagree.
1