Comments by "John" (@John-kv7jo) on "Judge Delivers Sentence to Ahmaud Arbery's Killers" video.

The Judge was licking the boots of BLM with this sentencing. Ahmaud wasn't just jogging, he was fleeing when spotted by a neighbor trespassing on Mr. English's house. Further, Ahmaud was shot just because Travis wanted to shoot Ahmaud, he was shot in self defence when Ahmaud went for the gun. Ahmaud was a thief and his sins caught up with him.
1
@DC-ih5xb The judge failed before today. He allowed the state to misquote the law. Further he failed to instruct the jury regarding the law. Hopefully all three men will get a new trial.
1
@hopeless_pedantic4256 Said the person who is hopeless and useless.
1
@Viperveteran Yes.
1
@jalisacaple8980 Ignorant woman who doesn't understand the law. Also you are racist against white people. ;)
1
@DC-ih5xb The Citizen's Arrest Law.
1
@DC-ih5xb Incorrect. All you need for a felony arrest is reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion. The three men had both and therefore had the right to arrest Ahmaud. Ahmaud resisted and ended up dead. His sins caught up with him. Remember never go for someone's gun.
1
@DC-ih5xb That's nonsense. You're fooling yourself. There are two parts to the law: A private citizen may arrest another person when: (1) an offense is committed in the private person’s presence or within their “immediate knowledge” (whatever that means); or (2) a felony is committed, the offender is escaping or attempting to escape, and the private citizen acts upon “reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion.” A felony was committed in that Mr. English's stuff was stolen, Ahmaud was seen fleeing from the house when a neighbor spotted him and therefore all the three men needed was reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion. It could also be argued that Greg McMichael had immediate knowledge seeing that the neighbor pointed Greg in Ahmaud's direction when he was on the phone with 911. Therefore the three men's freedom was sacrificed on the altar of expediency to appease Black Lies Matter.
1
@DC-ih5xb a private citizen may arrest another person when: (1) an offense is committed in the private person’s presence or within their “immediate knowledge” (whatever that means); or (2) a felony is committed, the offender is escaping or attempting to escape, and the private citizen acts upon “reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion.”
1
@DC-ih5xb There is a difference between offense and felony. An offense refers to a misdemeanor.
1
@Meghan We don't know if he ever stole anything. Mr. English did not know who stole his stuff. Mr. English didn't know when his property was stolen so Ahmaud was still a suspect. The theft of Mr. English's stuff is a felony. Ahmaud was fleeing the house on the day he was shot. All the three men was reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion. The crime doesn't need to be committed in their presence if it is a felony. Read the law again. There are two parts to the law.
1
@Meghan We don't know if he stole anything or not. It is an indisputable fact that Mr. English's stuff was stolen. Theft is a felony, Ahmaud was seen fleeing from the premises when spotted by a neighbor who then pointed Greg McMichael in the direction Ahmaud was fleeing. This gave the three men reasonable and probable grounds to arrest Ahmaud. If you read the law, for a felony arrest one doesn't need immediate knowledge of the crime. All one needs is reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion. The evidence against Ahmaud was overwhelming.
1
@Meghan Incorrect. Mr. English's stuff was stolen the value being over $1000. The felony is that Mr. English's stuff was stolen. The felony didn't need to be committed that day. Ahmaud was seen fleeing from the house and a chase ensued. You are incorrect when you assume that one cannot conduct a citizen's arrest unless a crime was committed on that day. The law doesn't specify when the felony needs to take place, one only needs reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion to make an arrest. Again you are mistaken that they needed immediate knowledge. There are two parts to the law. You need to read the law again. One part deals with misdemeanors and the latter part deals with felonies. They had a mountain of evidence against Ahmaud to arrest him. I would argue that Greg McMichael had immediate knowledge that Ahmaud was fleeing as Ahmaud not only ran past him but the neighbor pointed Greg in Ahmaud's direction while he was on the phone to 911. Ahmaud was no victim. He was a thief who died when he tried to wrestle the gun from Travis' hands. Never go for someone's gun. This has nothing to do with race but a case of self defence.
1
@Meghan Read the law again.
1
@Meghan No it doesn't say that at all. As long as the person is a suspect in a felony, all you need is reasonable and probable cause. If you read the article I linked to you, it talks about the law which is ambiguous. Therefore the benefit of the doubt always goes to the defendant. You're fooling yourself. Mr. English testified that stuff was stolen but didn't know who stole it or from which property it was stolen. The cameras were never positioned near the boat so we don't know if Ahmaud stole the stuff or not. What is indisputable is that Ahmaud was seen no less than five times trespassing on Mr. English's property. Another fact is that Ahmaud was fleeing the property on the day he was shot. Ahmaud died when he went for the gun. This was a case of self defence. Don't bring race into this. You are mistaken when you said that the defendants received a fair trial. The prosecution misquoted the law like the majority of people and tried combining the requirements for a misdemeanor and felony into one. There are two sentences dealing with two different scenarios. All that is required for a felony arrest is reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion.
1
@ikant312 Don't talk trash. Read the law again. The men had grounds to arrest Ahmaud.
1
@ikant312 Go read the law. They had every right to detain Ahmaud on reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion. The prosecution misquoted the law to the jury.
1
@ikant312 Incorrect again. They didn't just see him running down the street, the neighbor who saw him trespassing pointed Greg McMichael in the direction Ahmaud was fleeing. All the three men needed was reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion.
1
@ikant312 Yes they did. Read the law again.
1
@ikant312 You conveniently fail to mention that he was seen on CCTV no less than five times trespassing on Mr. English's property. You also fail to mention that Travis had a run in with Ahmaud weeks before he was shot. They had reasonable and probable grounds to arrest him for the theft of Mr. English's stuff. No racism here. Ahmaud was shot when he went for the gun. Never go for someone's gun.
1
@ikant312 They don't need immediate knowledge of a crime to conduct a citizen's arrest for a felony. Read the law again.
1
@ikant312 It doesn't matter when the stuff was stolen. The law doesn't give a specified time when the stuff needed to be stolen. Mr. English didn't know who stole the stuff. However, Ahmaud was seen no less than five times trespassing on the property where the stuff may or may not have bee stolen from.
1
@ikant312 No Ahmaud committed suicide.
1
@ikant312 His lying mother said that. He was the one that went for the gun. Just another mother who raised her son the wrong way.
1
@ikant312 Yes given the totality of the evidence against Ahmaud, they had the right to detain and arrest Ahmaud.
1