Comments by "John" (@John-kv7jo) on "Jury Reaches Verdict in Staged Suicide Murder Trial" video.

  1. Nonsense. The injuries sustained to her neck could have only occurred by manual strangulation. The jury didn't understand circumstantial evidence and let a murderer walk. The defense witness was a paid liar.
    4
  2. He had the motive and all evidence points to a homicide not a suicide.
    4
  3. There was ample evidence to convict. Matt had the motive and the cause of death was a homicide. The injuries sustained to her neck could have only occurred by manual strangulation.
    2
  4.  @SHARON.I  Dr Smok in all the years he's been a medical examiner testified that the damage on her neck could not be by hanging but rather fits a death by strangulation.
    2
  5. The wrong verdict. The jury allowed a murderer to walk.
    2
  6.  @austinhansen9079  The man is guilty. All evidence points to this.
    1
  7.  @PaulPulver-dr1cd  I stand by my gut feeling that he is guilty.
    1
  8.  @PaulPulver-dr1cd  There was evidence. The jury wanted a video of the murder. Don't check your brain at the door when you're a juror.
    1
  9.  @PaulPulver-dr1cd  No. I stand by my claim that he murdered his wife. His son also died in similar circumstances.
    1
  10.  @PaulPulver-dr1cd  I think you are easily deceived. Both his wife and son commit suicide? You've had the wool pulled over your eyes. Time to wake up and smell the coffee. It seems if he doesn't get his way, he kills those close to him and stages their bodies to look like a suicide.
    1
  11.  @austinhansen9079  There is circumstantial evidence. The jury were too dumb to understand what circumstantial evidence is. They wanted a video of him killing her.
    1
  12. ​ @austinhansen9079  Most murders that take place, the murderer is known to the victim.
    1
  13. They had circumstantial evidence. The manner of death was a homicide. The defence witness was a paid liar. The jury was unwilling to convict because they didn't understand circumstantial evidence.
    1
  14. There was more than enough evidence to convict. The jury are a bunch of idiots. Didn't they understand that the injuries to her neck could not have occurred due to a suicide. The only person with a motive to kill her was Matheau after their marriage was over. A random person would not have gone to the length of staging her body if it was a random attack.
    1
  15. Diane is a liar defending a murderer. That is her job and she did a good job. However all evidence supports a homicide and the jury allowed a murderer to walk.
    1