General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
HaJo Os.
Curious Droid
comments
Comments by "HaJo Os." (@hajoos.8360) on "Curious Droid" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
@solomongrundy1467 The US did not want it, too.
3
we are the heretics and you are the believers, you have to prove it with more than cheap science fiction.
2
There is no back...
1
@superturbomira in the 60s youz had the money but you received worse playmobil science-fisction movies....
1
@markbeiser https://youtu.be/Xk3Y4qC8gow
1
@MBicknell the Hoax? Of course, it is an amazing feeling to find plenty of those stupid "Jesus on the Moon" believers.
1
@MBicknell https://youtu.be/Xk3Y4qC8gow or https://youtu.be/IpXEpJAb8ZY or https://youtu.be/mfR82NX58Bo are crack lunatics? Go on furthermore and sell us Jesus on the Moon. You will find millions of followers, who will welcome your evidence.
1
@partypoet2012 i do not need any flat-earth-community, when i can see the earth's curvature by myselfes, as i did it several times.
1
@partypoet2012 already Archimedes saw it at the shore looking out for ship-sails. Please stop talking bull-shit.
1
@partypoet2012 Archimedes quotes are not only a theory, you are able to reproduce them.
1
@partypoet2012 it is useless to debate with believers. But beside this useless debate it is interesting to hear this presentation by Jeffrey Rusick of Nasa (National Agency of Space Actors) in, it seems, 2014. https://youtu.be/mfR82NX58Bo
1
@partypoet2012 You have no answer for the different Moon-phases. You will not tell me that the Moon is flat, or do you? When the German battleship Scharnhorst made it's first hit with the 3rd salvo on the British aircraft-carrier Glorious on 8th of June, 1940, Scharhorst hit from a distance of 24 KMs or more. Scharnhorst's Gunners had shot behind the horizon.
1
@partypoet2012 your gunners must be Cowboy-gunners. Only US-tank-commanders are educated only to shot in line of sight. Maybe you are a cowboy, too.
1
Nasa's Rusick says we cannot go through and he is begging for help ... this here is miserable propaganda https://youtu.be/dux2ofFHs90
1
Waging war on Germany brought the technical advance. Bucannering is the business model.
1
@Dev-In-Denver123 most people in Europe speak German, than Russian. Do you want to change the language?
1
of course, even the Apollo losers never went to it.
1
Fairy tales. Even the Russians and the Chinese lied. They never landed rovers on the moon. Soft rocket landing was not possible till the current decade.
1
No, you did it in a film studio.
1
@caav56 the Russians were not even with rovers on the moon, Luna was a lie. Till our decade there is no evidence of the ability of soft-rocket-landing. Bill Kaysing stated that the Saturn V ran with B1-engines and not with F1-engines due to the same problems as the Atlas-project. But the B1-engines could not run the Saturn V fully loaded, so they fueled only for earth orbit during the entire Apollo-mission-programme.
1
@caav56 yes of course. https://youtu.be/bvim4rsNHkQ Delta Clipper had often problems with melting landing legs, the rest means our current decade. On earth more thrust is needed than on the moon. But we do know nothing about the landing in a vacuum. On Mars NASA used very big parashutes. And ESA was not really able to synchronize a sonde with a comet with nearly no gravity.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All